Georgios Koronis

Dr. Georgios Koronis

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

14Years (2013-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 January 2013 in Composites Part B: Engineering
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
GKGeorgios Koronis
Georgios Koronis
Arlindo SilvaArlindo Silva
Arlindo Silva
MFMihail Fontul
Mihail Fontul

19 February 2016
Verified
Book Chapter
Closed access
PDF file
GKGeorgios Koronis
Georgios Koronis
Arlindo SilvaArlindo Silva
Arlindo Silva
SFSamuel Furtado
Samuel Furtado

1 December 2017 in Materials Today Communications
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
GKGeorgios Koronis
Georgios Koronis
Arlindo SilvaArlindo Silva
Arlindo Silva
Shaohui FoongShaohui Foong
Shaohui Foong

28 March 2019 in Journal of Mechanical Design
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
GKGeorgios Koronis
Georgios Koronis
PCPei Zhi Chia
Pei Zhi Chia
JSJacob Kang Kai Siang
Jacob Kang Kai Siang
Arlindo SilvaArlindo Silva
Arlindo Silva
CYChristine Yogiaman
Christine Yogiaman
NRNilanjan Raghunath
Nilanjan Raghunath
This study aims to understand how information in design briefs affects the creativity of design outcomes. We tested this during a Collaborative Sketching (C-Sketch) ideation exercise with first-year undergraduate student designers. We focus on four types of stimuli—quantitative requirements, a visual example (video), a physical example, and contextual information—and we measure creativity according to three metrics—novelty, appropriateness, and usability with either the participants’ gender or the gender diversity of the participants’ groups. The findings suggest that the main effect of providing a video example results in high appropriateness and usability scores but low novelty scores and that physical-contextual briefs have high novelty and usability scores. In addition, we did not find any correlation between gender or gender diversity and creativity scores.

27 September 2022 in Journal of Composites Science
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
GKGeorgios Koronis
Georgios Koronis
Arlindo SilvaArlindo Silva
Arlindo Silva
MOMichael Ong
Michael Ong
Comparing the structural performance and environmental impact of parts made of natural and synthetic fibers has become increasingly important for industry and education, as the benefits of one type of fiber over another are not always clear. The current work discusses the advantages and disadvantages of using natural and synthetic fibers and compares the flexural performance of parts made of each of these fibers and their environmental impact. This paper investigates the flexural behavior of epoxy composites modified by glass and flax fabrics through experimental, numerical, and analytical studies. Specimens with various fabrics (dried and non-dried) were fabricated to test their performance. The failure of unidirectional glass and flax fiber reinforced polymer composite laminate was examined by destructive testing. A finite-element model was developed, and the mechanical behaviors of fiber-reinforced composites were predicted in a three-point bending test. Experimental results were compared to numerical analysis to validate the model’s accuracy. A life cycle assessment (LCA) was employed to determine the climate impact of composite production. The analysis revealed a decreased environmental effect of plant-based panels suggesting that they are less energy and CO2 intensive than synthetic solutions. The LCA model can be applied in further studies of products that consist of or use flax-based composites.