Aditya Shah

Dr. Aditya Shah


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

10Years (2017-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
28 February 2020 in Mayo Clinic Proceedings
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
ASAditya Shah
Aditya Shah
Rahul KashyapRahul Kashyap
Rahul Kashyap
PTPritish Tosh
Pritish Tosh
PSPriya Sampathkumar
Priya Sampathkumar
JOJohn C. O’horo
John C. O’horo

14 June 2022 in Clinical Infectious Diseases
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
NRNischal Ranganath
Nischal Ranganath
JOJohn C O’horo
John C O’horo
DCDouglas W Challener
Douglas W Challener
STSidna M Tulledge-Scheitel
Sidna M Tulledge-Scheitel
MPMarsha L Pike
Marsha L Pike
ASAditya Shah
Aditya Shah
In a cohort of 483 high-risk patients treated with nirmatrelvir/ritonavir for COVID-19, 2 patients (0.4%) required hospitalization by day 30. Four patients (0.8%) experienced rebound of symptoms, which were generally mild, at a median of 9 days after treatment, and all resolved without additional COVID-19–directed therapy.

5 March 2024 in Clinical Infectious Diseases
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JMJoseph Marcus
Joseph Marcus
ASAditya Shah
Aditya Shah
GPGiles J Peek
Giles J Peek
GMGraeme MacLaren
Graeme MacLaren
Over the past 10 years, there has been a rapid expansion in the use of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) in the care of patients with refractory cardiac or respiratory failure. Infectious diseases clinicians must reconcile conflicting evidence from limited studies as they develop practices at their own institutions, which has resulted in considerably different practices globally. This review describes infection control and prevention as well as antimicrobial prophylaxis strategies in this population. Data on diagnostics and treatment for patients receiving ECMO with a focus on diagnostic and antimicrobial stewardship is then examined. This review summarizes gaps in the current ECMO literature and proposes future needs, including developing clear definitions for infections and encouraging transparent reporting of practices at individual facilities in future clinical trials.

1 July 2020 in Mayo Clinic Proceedings
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ASAditya Shah
Aditya Shah
DCDouglas W. William Challener
Douglas W. William Challener
ATAaron J. Tande
Aaron J. Tande
Maryam MahmoodMaryam Mahmood
Maryam Mahmood
JOJohn C. O’horo
John C. O’horo
SCSarah J. Crane
Sarah J. Crane

1 March 2021 in Mayo Clinic Proceedings
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
JOJohn Charles O’hOro
John Charles O’hOro
JCJames R. Cerhan
James R. Cerhan
ECElliot J. Cahn
Elliot J. Cahn
PBPhilippe R. Bauer
Philippe R. Bauer
ZTZelalem Temesgen
Zelalem Temesgen
ABAndrew D. Badley
Andrew D. Badley
To report the Mayo Clinic experience with COVID-19 related to patient outcomes. We conducted a retrospective chart review of patients diagnosed with COVID-19 between March 1, 2020 and July 31, 2020 at any of the Mayo Clinic sites. We abstracted pertinent comorbidities such as age, gender, body mass index, Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) variables, and treatments received. Factors associated with hospitalization and mortality were assessed in univariate and multivariate models. A total of 7,891 patients with confirmed COVID-19 with research authorization on file received care across the Mayo Clinic during the study period. Of these, 7217 patients were adults ≥ 18 years old which were analyzed further. 897 (11.3%) patients required hospitalization, and 354 (4.5%) patients received care in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU). All hospitalized patients were reviewed by a COVID-19 Treatment Review Panel, and 77.5% of inpatients received a COVID-19 directed therapy. Overall mortality was 1.1%, with 7.1% mortality in hospitalized patients and 11.9% in patients requiring ICU care. Mayo Clinic outcomes of COVID-19 patients in the ICU, hospital and community compare favorably to those reported nationally. This likely reflects the impact of interprofessional multidisciplinary team evaluation, effective leveraging of clinical trials and available treatments, deployment of remote monitoring tools, and maintenance of adequate operating capacity to not require surge adjustments. These best practices can help guide other health care systems with the continuing response to the COVID-19 pandemic.

12 February 2021 in Clinical Infectious Diseases
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
ASAditya Shah
Aditya Shah
PSPriya Sampathkumar
Priya Sampathkumar
RSRyan W Stevens
Ryan W Stevens
JBJohn K Bohman
John K Bohman
BLBrian D Lahr
Brian D Lahr
JOJohn C O’hOro
John C O’hOro
Background: The use of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) in critically ill adults is increasing. There are currently no guidelines for antimicrobial prophylaxis. We analyzed 7 years of prophylactic antimicrobial use across 3 time series for patients on ECMO at our institution in the development, improvement, and streamlining of our ECMO antimicrobial prophylaxis protocol. Methods: In this quasi-experimental interrupted time series analysis, we evaluated the impact of an initial ECMO antimicrobial prophylaxis protocol, implemented in 2014, on antimicrobial use and National Healthcare Safety Network–reportable infection rates. Then, following a revision and streamlining of the protocol in November 2018, we reevaluated the same metrics. Results: Our study population included 338 intensive care unit patients who received ECMO between July 2011 and November 2019. After implementation of the first version of the protocol, we did not observe significant changes in antimicrobial use or infection rates in these patients; however, following revision and streamlining of the protocol, we demonstrated a significant reduction in broad-spectrum antimicrobial use for prophylaxis in patients on ECMO without any evidence of a compensatory increase in infection rates. Conclusions: Our final protocol significantly reduces broad-spectrum antimicrobial use for prophylaxis in patients on ECMO. We propose a standard antimicrobial prophylaxis regimen for patients on ECMO based on current evidence and our experience. Summary: There are no guidelines for antimicrobial prophylaxis in patients on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). A rational approach employing concepts of antimicrobial stewardship can drive logical antimicrobial selection for prophylaxis in patients on ECMO without adversely impacting outcomes.