April D. Denise Thames

Dr. April D. Denise Thames

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

18Years (2009-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
7 February 2013 in Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
ATApril D. Denise Thames
April D. Denise Thames
CHCharles H. Hinkin
Charles H. Hinkin
DBDesiree A. Byrd
Desiree A. Byrd
RBRobert M. Bilder
Robert M. Bilder
KDKimberley J. Duff
Kimberley J. Duff
VSVanessa Streiff
Vanessa Streiff
The purpose of the current study was to examine the predictive roles of stereotype threat and perceived discrimination and the mediating role of examiner-examinee racial discordance on neuropsychological performance in a non-clinical sample of African American and Caucasian individuals. Ninety-two African American (n = 45) and Caucasian (n = 47) adults were randomly assigned to either a stereotype threat or non-threat condition. Within each condition, participants were randomly assigned to either a same race or different race examiner. All participants underwent neuropsychological testing and completed a measure of perceived discrimination. African Americans in the stereotype threat condition performed significantly worse on global NP (Mz = −.30, 95% confidence interval [CI] [−0.07, −0.67] than African Americans in the non-threat condition (Mz = 0.09, CI [0.15, 0.33]. African Americans who reported high levels of perceived discrimination performed significantly worse on memory tests when tested by an examiner of a different race, Mz = −1.19, 95% CI [−1.78, −.54], than African Americans who were tested by an examiner of the same race, Mz = 0.24, 95% CI [−0.24, 0.72]. The current study underscores the importance of considering the role of contextual variables in neuropsychological performance, as these variables may obscure the validity of results among certain racial/ethnic groups. (JINS, 2013, 19, 1–10)

6 August 2010 in Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ATApril D. Denise Thames
April D. Denise Thames
MKMichelle S. Kim
Michelle S. Kim
BBBrian W. Becker
Brian W. Becker
JFJessica M. Foley
Jessica M. Foley
LHLindsay J. Hines
Lindsay J. Hines
CHCharles H. Hinkin
Charles H. Hinkin
This study examined the effects of aging and cognitive impairment on medication and finance management in an HIV sample. We observed main effects of age (older < younger) and neuropsychological impairment on functional task performance. Interactions between age and cognition demonstrated that older impaired individuals performed significantly more poorly than all other comparison groups. There were no relationships between laboratory performance and self-reported medication and finance management. The interaction of advancing age and cognitive impairment may confer significant functional limitations for HIV individuals that may be better detected by performance-based measures of functional abilities rather than patient self-report.

22 December 2010 in The Clinical Neuropsychologist
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ATApril D. Denise Thames
April D. Denise Thames
BBBrian W. Becker
Brian W. Becker
TMThomas D. Marcotte
Thomas D. Marcotte
LHLindsay J. Hines
Lindsay J. Hines
JFJessica M. Foley
Jessica M. Foley
CHCharles H. Hinkin
Charles H. Hinkin
Depression frequently co-occurs with HIV infection and can result in self-reported overestimates of cognitive deficits. Conversely, genuine cognitive dysfunction can lead to an under-appreciation of cognitive deficits. The degree to which depression and cognition influence self-report of capacity for instrumental activities of daily living (IADLs) requires further investigation. This study examined the effects of depression and cognitive deficits on self-appraisal of functional competence among 107 HIV-infected adults. As hypothesized, higher levels of depression were found among those who over-reported problems in medication management, driving, and cognition when compared to those who under-reported or provided accurate self-assessments. In contrast, genuine cognitive dysfunction was predictive of under-reporting of functional deficits. Together, these results suggest that over-reliance on self-reported functional status poses risk for error when diagnoses require documentation of both cognitive impairment and associated functional disability in everyday life.

1 May 2014 in Addictive Behaviors
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ATApril D. Denise Thames
April D. Denise Thames
NANatalie Arbid
Natalie Arbid
PSPhilip Sayegh
Philip Sayegh

17 November 2014 in Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
PSPhilip Sayegh
Philip Sayegh
AAAlyssa Arentoft
Alyssa Arentoft
NTNicholas S. Thaler
Nicholas S. Thaler
ADAndy C. Dean
Andy C. Dean
ATApril D. Denise Thames
April D. Denise Thames
The current study examined whether self-rated education quality predicts Wide Range Achievement Test-4th Edition (WRAT-4) Word Reading subtest and neurocognitive performance, and aimed to establish this subtest's construct validity as an educational quality measure. In a community-based adult sample (N = 106), we tested whether education quality both increased the prediction of Word Reading scores beyond demographic variables and predicted global neurocognitive functioning after adjusting for WRAT-4. As expected, race/ethnicity and education predicted WRAT-4 reading performance. Hierarchical regression revealed that when including education quality, the amount of WRAT-4's explained variance increased significantly, with race/ethnicity and both education quality and years as significant predictors. Finally, WRAT-4 scores, but not education quality, predicted neurocognitive performance. Results support WRAT-4 Word Reading as a valid proxy measure for education quality and a key predictor of neurocognitive performance. Future research should examine these findings in larger, more diverse samples to determine their robust nature.

23 December 2015 in AIDS Care
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ATApril D. Denise Thames
April D. Denise Thames
ZMZanjbeel Mahmood
Zanjbeel Mahmood
ABAlison C. Burggren
Alison C. Burggren
AKAhoo Karimian
Ahoo Karimian
TKTaylor P. Kuhn
Taylor P. Kuhn
The current study examined the independent and combined effects of HIV and marijuana (MJ) use (no use, light use, and moderate-to-heavy use) on neurocognitive functioning among a convenience sample of HIV-positive (HIV+) and HIV-negative (HIV–) individuals recruited from HIV community care clinics and advertisements in the Greater Los Angeles area. MJ users consisted of individuals who reported regular use of MJ for at least 12 months, with last reported use within the past month. Participants included 89 HIV+ (n = 55) and HIV– (n = 34) individuals who were grouped into non-users, light users, and moderate-to-heavy users based on self-reported MJ use. Participants were administered a brief cognitive test battery and underwent laboratory testing for CD4 count and viral load. HIV+ individuals demonstrated lower performance on neurocognitive testing than controls, and moderate-to-heavy MJ users performed more poorly on neurocognitive testing than light users or non-users. Moderate-to-heavy HIV+ users performed significantly lower on learning/memory than HIV– moderate-to-heavy users (MD = −8.34; 95% CI: −16.11 to −0.56) as well as all other comparison groups. In the domain of verbal fluency, HIV+ light users outperformed HIV– light users (MD = 7.28; 95% CI: 1.62–12.39), but no HIV group differences were observed at other MJ use levels. HIV+ MJ users demonstrated lower viral load (MD = −0.58; 95% CI: −1.30 to 0.14) and higher CD4 count than non-users (MD = 137.67; 95% CI: 9.48–265.85). The current study findings extend the literature by demonstrating the complex relationship between HIV status and MJ use on neurocognitive and clinical outcomes.