Shohei Kawashiro

Dr. Shohei Kawashiro

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

13Years (2014-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 August 2018 in International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SKShohei Kawashiro
Shohei Kawashiro
SYShigeru Yamada
Shigeru Yamada
MOMasahiko Okamoto
Masahiko Okamoto
TOTatsuya Ohno
Tatsuya Ohno
TNTakashi Nakano
Takashi Nakano
TKTadashi Kamada
Tadashi Kamada

1 March 2019 in Radiotherapy and Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MSMakoto Shinoto
Makoto Shinoto
SYShigeru Yamada
Shigeru Yamada
MOMasahiko Okamoto
Masahiko Okamoto
YSYoshiyuki Shioyama
Yoshiyuki Shioyama
TOTatsuya Ohno
Tatsuya Ohno
TKTadashi Kamada
Tadashi Kamada

1 April 2017 in British Journal of Radiology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SKShohei Kawashiro
Shohei Kawashiro
SMShinichiro Mori
Shinichiro Mori
SYShigeru Yamada
Shigeru Yamada
KMKentaro Miki
Kentaro Miki
KNKenji Nemoto
Kenji Nemoto
TKTadashi Kamada
Tadashi Kamada
Objective:Pancreatic cancer is a difficult to treat disease with a persistently high mortality rate. We evaluated dose distribution simulation with respiratory-gated carbon-ion pencil beam scanning (C-PBS) with a simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) to increase tumour dose, sparing organs at risk (OARs).Methods:Using four-dimensional CT data of 12 patients, we delineated gross tumour volume and two clinical target volumes (CTVs). To consider beam range intrafractional uncertainty, we calculated field-specific target volumes, from which two planning target volumes (PTVs) were generated. PTV1 would receive a planned dose of 55.2 Gy [relative biological effectiveness (RBE)-weighted absorbed dose] in 12 fractions, and PTV2 would receive an SIB dose up to 67.2 Gy (RBE). Dose assessments were conducted with regard to the targets and OARs.Results:CTV2 dose covering 95% of the volume (D95%) increased from 50.3 ± 5.1 Gy (RBE) to 62.5 ± 3.5 Gy (RBE) for a planned dose from 55.2 Gy (RBE) to 67.2 Gy (RBE). For 4 of 12...

1 October 2018 in Radiotherapy and Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SKShohei Kawashiro
Shohei Kawashiro
SYShigeru Yamada
Shigeru Yamada
YIYuka Isozaki
Yuka Isozaki
KNKenji Nemoto
Kenji Nemoto
HTHiroshi Tsuji
Hiroshi Tsuji
TKTadashi Kamada
Tadashi Kamada

10 December 2015 in Journal of Radiation Research
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SKShohei Kawashiro
Shohei Kawashiro
HHHideyuki Harada
Hideyuki Harada
HKHirohisa Katagiri
Hirohisa Katagiri
HAHirofumi Asakura
Hirofumi Asakura
HOHirofumi Ogawa
Hirofumi Ogawa
TNTetsuo Nishimura
Tetsuo Nishimura
This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of reirradiation with intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) for spinal metastases. We retrospectively analyzed 23 patients with spinal metastases who underwent IMRT reirradiation between December 2006 and July 2013. We evaluated the spinal radiation doses during the first and second radiation therapy courses, the interval between the courses, and the clinical outcomes after reirradiation, including skeletal-related events, local control rates (LCRs), overall survival (OS), and toxicities. The median time from the first irradiation to reirradiation was 13 months (range, 2–75 months). The median reirradiation dose delivered to 90% of the planning target volume was 24.5 Gy in 5 fractions (range, 14.7–50 Gy in 3–25 fractions). Nineteen patients experienced pain at reirradiation, and 15 of these attained pain relief. Two of the three patients with paresis in the upper or lower extremities upon initiation of reirradiation demonstrated improvement. Local progression was identified in four patients. The median time to local progression was 37 months. The 1- and 2-year LCRs after reirradiation were 88% and 75%, respectively. The 1- and 2-year OS rates after reirradiation were 45% and 20%, respectively, with a median OS of 12 months. No late toxicities occurred. In conclusion, spinal metastasis reirradiation using IMRT appears safe; pain relief and paresis improvement and/or prevention can be expected, along with a reduced risk of radiation-induced toxicity, especially in the spinal cord.

20 July 2017 in Journal of Surgical Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
YIYuka Isozaki
Yuka Isozaki
SYShigeru Yamada
Shigeru Yamada
SKShohei Kawashiro
Shohei Kawashiro
SYShigeo Yasuda
Shigeo Yasuda
NONaomi Okada
Naomi Okada
HMHisahiro Matsubara
Hisahiro Matsubara