Purpose: The primary purpose of this policy analysis is to examine how states changed their principal performance evaluation systems since the passage of Every Student Succeeds Act in 2015. In particular, we focus on whether states have capitalized on the flexible policy landscape to make space for meaningful family and community engagement (FCE) in assessing principals’ effectiveness. Research Methods: This study uses document analysis to review the structure of principal evaluation systems in all 50 states and selects 17 revised systems for a deeper review of their approach to leadership for partnering with families and communities. Findings: A plurality of states have not substantively revised their evaluation systems. Several of the revised systems narrowly focused on instructional leadership and student achievement measures and were thus unsupportive of meaningful FCE and federal policy aims for schools to work in partnership with family and community stakeholders. The principal evaluation systems most supportive of authentic family and community engagement allowed for flexible goal setting and explicitly encouraged the use of stakeholder feedback as evidence of principals’ effectiveness. Implications for Research and Policy: The authors discuss the implications of the results in terms of 1.) expanding definitions of educational leadership to include tenets of authentic FCE, 2.) creating coherent yet compendious systems for school improvement, and 3.) planning for and implementing a developmental approach to the evaluation of school leaders.

This study determined what principals need to successfully lead community schools and the extent principals are prepared to lead them. The authors of this qualitative study collected data from a broad sample of community school experts, principals, and directors to develop a list of necessary qualities for community school principals. Although the qualities were reflected in the Professional Standards for Educational Leaders, practitioners appeared to struggle with operationalizing their espoused commitments to equity and meaningful community engagement into action. The authors partially attribute the disconnect between beliefs and behavior to a lack of coherent preparation that addresses community equity literacy.

Generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) tools developed to support teaching and learning are widely available. Trustworthiness concerns, however, have prompted calls for researchers to study their effectiveness and for educators and educational researchers to be involved in their creation and piloting processes. This study investigated one type of GenAI created to support educators: multiple-choice question generators (MCQ GenAI). Among the nine MCQ GenAI tools investigated, a variety of useful options were available, but only one indicated teacher involvement and none mentioned testing experts in development processes. MCQ GenAI-created items (n = 270) were coded based on MCQ quality item-writing guidelines. Results showed 80.00% of items (n = 216) violated at least one guideline, with 73.70% (n = 199) likely to produce major measurement error (should not use without revision), 6.30% (n = 17) likely to elicit minor measurement error (consider modifying), and 20.00% (n = 54) acceptable (usable as created). Implications suggest multidisciplinary teams are needed in educational GenAI tool development.

Hydraulic fracturing has altered the face of rural communities across the United States, creating new demands for educational leaders. This in-depth qualitative study explores how rural educational leaders in a heavily drilled community experience and respond to these challenges with a focus on increased local student transiency, homelessness, and the influx of newcomers, including English language learners. The research finds that leaders respond to transient outsider needs through a discourse of compliance and engage in contextually responsive, collaborative responses to meet the needs of community insiders. The authors find little evidence of critical place-conscious leadership in this rapidly changing social and economic context.

Little research has focused on the extent to which community school principals approach family engagement efforts, specifically from an equity-centered perspective. This study examined how community school principals’ leadership practices exhibited tenets of Community Equity Literacy. Results from interviews with 13 administrators and 19 coordinators from three states highlighted the importance of equity, but participants’ conceptions were often embedded in school-centric paradigms that exhibited surface-level understandings of family and community strengths. Dispositions and skills principals need to forge relationships with families that extend beyond service provisions to create equitable community-centric partnerships inclusive of a broad group of constituents are discussed.