Pattern separation is a computational process by which dissimilar neural patterns are generated from similar input patterns. We present an information-geometric formulation of pattern separation, where a pattern separator is modeled as a family of statistical distributions on a manifold. Such a manifold maps an input (i.e., coordinates) to a probability distribution that generates firing patterns. Pattern separation occurs when small coordinate changes result in large distances between samples from the corresponding distributions. Under this formulation, we implement a two-neuron system whose probability law forms a three-dimensional manifold with mutually orthogonal coordinates representing the neurons’ marginal and correlational firing rates. We use this highly controlled system to examine the behavior of spike train similarity indices commonly used in pattern separation research. We find that all indices (except scaling factor) are sensitive to relative differences in marginal firing rates, but no index adequately captures differences in spike trains that result from altering the correlation in activity between the two neurons. That is, existing pattern separation metrics appear (A) sensitive to patterns that are encoded by different neurons but (B) insensitive to patterns that differ only in relative spike timing (e.g., synchrony between neurons in the ensemble).

Pattern separation is a computational process by which dissimilar neural patterns are generated from similar input patterns. We present an information-geometric formulation of pattern separation, where a pattern separator is modelled as a family of statistical distributions on a manifold. Such a manifold maps an input (i.e. coordinates) to a probability distribution that generates firing patterns. Pattern separation occurs when small coordinate changes result in large distances between samples from the corresponding distributions. Under this formulation, we implement a two-neuron system whose probability law forms a 3-dimensional manifold with mutually orthogonal coordinates representing the neurons' marginal and correlational firing rates. We use this highly controlled system to examine the behaviour of spike train similarity indices commonly used in pattern separation research. We found that all indices (except scaling factor) were sensitive to relative differences in marginal firing rates, but no index adequately captured differences in spike trains that resulted from altering the correlation in activity between the two neurons. That is, existing pattern separation metrics appear (A) sensitive to patterns that are encoded by different neurons, but (B) insensitive to patterns that differ only in relative spike timing (e.g. synchrony between neurons in the ensemble).