Background: Ischaemic heart disease is one of the major drivers of cardiovascular death in Europe. Since the first percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in 1977, developments and innovations in cardiology have made PCI the treatment of choice for stenotic coronary artery disease. To address the occupational hazards related to chronic exposure to radiation and wear and tear from heavy lead-based radioprotective aprons, the concept of robotically assisted PCI (R-PCI) was introduced in 2005. Aim: To explore the features and limitations of R-PCI, we first discuss the concept and evolution of R-PCI platforms and then systematically review the available clinical data. Methods: A systematic review has been performed across the Pubmed, Embase and Cochrane databases in order to assess the efficacy and safety of R-PCI. Secondary endpoints, such as operator and patient exposure to radiation, contrast volume used and procedural time, were assessed when available. Results: In selected patients, R-PCI provides high technical and clinical success rates, ranging from 81 to 98.8% and from 93.3 to 100%, respectively. In-hospital and 1-year MACE rates ranged from 0 to 10.4% and 4.8 to 10.5%, respectively. R-PCI is able to significantly reduce the operator’s exposure to radiation. Further research analysing the patient’s and cath lab staff’s exposure to radiation is needed. Therapy escalation with R-PCI seems to be limited to complex lesions. R-PCI procedures add approximately 10 min to the procedural time. Conclusions: The efficacy and safety of R-PCI have been proven, and R-PCI is able to significantly reduce occupational hazards for the first operator. The lack of adoption in the community of interventional cardiologists may be explained by the fact that current generations of R-PCI platforms are limited by their incompatibility with advanced interventional devices and techniques needed for escalation in complex interventions.

The classical concept of plaque vulnerability, centred on specific morphological features, has failed to deliver reliable risk prediction in clinical practice. Recent evidence highlights the need to redefine coronary vulnerability as a dynamic, patient-specific phenotype shaped by plaque biology, systemic inflammation, and haemodynamic forces. Advanced imaging modalities, artificial intelligence, and circulating biomarkers now enable a multidimensional assessment of this complex phenotype. This integrative approach may offer a more precise framework for risk stratification and personalised prevention in coronary artery disease.

The sympathetic division of the autonomic nervous system plays a crucial role in maintaining homeostasis, but its overactivity is implicated in various pathological conditions, including hypertension, hyperglycaemia, heart failure, and rheumatoid arthritis. Traditional pharmacotherapies often face limitations such as side effects and poor patient adherence, thus prompting the exploration of device-based multi-organ denervation as a therapeutic strategy. Crucially, this procedure can potentially offer therapeutic benefits throughout the 24 h circadian cycle, described as an “always-on” effect independent of medication compliance and pharmacokinetics. In this comprehensive review, we evaluate the evidence behind targeted multi-organ sympathetic denervation by considering the anatomy and function of the autonomic nervous system, examining the evidence linking sympathetic nervous system overactivity to various cardiometabolic and inflammatory conditions and exploring denervation studies within the literature. So far, renal denervation, developed in 2010, has shown promise in reducing blood pressure and may have broader applications for conditions including arrhythmias, glucose metabolism disorders, heart failure, chronic kidney disease and obstructive sleep apnoea. We review the existing literature surrounding the denervation of other organ systems including the hepatic and splenic arteries, as well as the pulmonary artery and carotid body, which may provide additional physiological benefits and enhance therapeutic effects if carried out simultaneously. Furthermore, we highlight the challenges and future directions for implementing multi-organ sympathetic ablation, emphasising the need for further clinical trials to establish optimal procedural technique, efficacy and safety.

Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) is a further light-based intravascular imaging modality and provides a high-resolution, cross-sectional view of coronary arteries. It has a useful anatomic and increasingly physiological evaluation in light of coronary artery disease (CAD). This review provides a critical examination of the increased application of the OCT in assessing coronary artery physiology, beyond its initial mainstay application in anatomical imaging. OCT provides precise information on plaque morphology, which can help identify vulnerable plaques, and is most important in informing percutaneous coronary interventions (PCIs), including implanting a stent and optimizing it. The combination of OCT and functional measurements, such as optical flow ratio and OCT-based fractional flow reserve (OCT-FFR), permits a more complete assessment of coronary stenoses, which may provide increased diagnostic accuracy and better revascularization decision-making. The recent developments in OCT technology have also enhanced the accuracy in the measurement of coronary functions. The innovations may support the optimal treatment of patients as they provide more personalized and individualized treatment options; however, it is critical to recognize the limitations of OCT and distinguish between the hypothetical advantages and empirical outcomes. This review evaluates the existing uses, technological solutions, and future trends in OCT-based physiological imaging and evaluation, and explains how such an advancement will be beneficial in the treatment of CAD and gives a fair representation concerning other imaging applications.

Percutaneous coronary intervention outcomes rely heavily on accurate lesion assessment and procedural planning. Invasive tools, such as fractional flow reserve, nonhyperemic pressure ratios, intravascular ultrasound, and optical coherence tomography, provide essential physiological and anatomic insights but are resource-intensive, prolong procedures, and increase contrast and radiation exposure. Coronary computed tomography (CT) angiography has emerged as a noninvasive modality with high diagnostic accuracy for coronary artery disease, capable of detailing plaque composition, lesion length, and vessel geometry. With the integration of CT-derived fractional flow reserve and CT myocardial perfusion imaging, coronary CT angiography now offers both anatomic and functional evaluation, bridging diagnostic and interventional decision-making. Despite guideline endorsement for coronary artery disease diagnosis, its role in guiding percutaneous coronary intervention strategies remains underutilized and absent from revascularization recommendations. This review outlines a practical, step-by-step framework for integrating coronary CT angiography into contemporary percutaneous coronary intervention planning, covering acquisition protocols, software platforms, lesion assessment, and stent strategy optimization. It also explores emerging intraprocedural applications, including fusion imaging, augmented and virtual reality, and holographic visualization. By synthesizing current evidence and identifying gaps, this review positions coronary CT angiography as a promising adjunct in precision-based percutaneous coronary intervention.