Deepak Ray

Dr. Deepak Ray

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

25Years (2002-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
12 October 2011 in Nature
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
JFJonathan A. Foley
Jonathan A. Foley
NRNavin Ramankutty
Navin Ramankutty
KBKate A. Brauman
Kate A. Brauman
ECEmily S. Cassidy
Emily S. Cassidy
JGJames S. Gerber
James S. Gerber
DZDavid P. M. Zaks
David P. M. Zaks
Increasing population and consumption are placing unprecedented demands on agriculture and natural resources. Today, approximately a billion people are chronically malnourished while our agricultural systems are concurrently degrading land, water, biodiversity and climate on a global scale. To meet the world/'s future food security and sustainability needs, food production must grow substantially while, at the same time, agriculture/'s environmental footprint must shrink dramatically. Here we analyse solutions to this dilemma, showing that tremendous progress could be made by halting agricultural expansion, closing /`yield gaps/' on underperforming lands, increasing cropping efficiency, shifting diets and reducing waste. Together, these strategies could double food production while greatly reducing the environmental impacts of agriculture.

19 June 2013 in PLOS ONE
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
DRDeepak Ray
Deepak Ray
NMNathaniel D. Mueller
Nathaniel D. Mueller
PWPaul West
Paul West
JFJonathan A. Foley
Jonathan A. Foley
Several studies have shown that global crop production needs to double by 2050 to meet the projected demands from rising population, diet shifts, and increasing biofuels consumption. Boosting crop yields to meet these rising demands, rather than clearing more land for agriculture has been highlighted as a preferred solution to meet this goal. However, we first need to understand how crop yields are changing globally, and whether we are on track to double production by 2050. Using ∼2.5 million agricultural statistics, collected for ∼13,500 political units across the world, we track four key global crops—maize, rice, wheat, and soybean—that currently produce nearly two-thirds of global agricultural calories. We find that yields in these top four crops are increasing at 1.6%, 1.0%, 0.9%, and 1.3% per year, non-compounding rates, respectively, which is less than the 2.4% per year rate required to double global production by 2050. At these rates global production in these crops would increase by ∼67%, ∼42%, ∼38%, and ∼55%, respectively, which is far below what is needed to meet projected demands in 2050. We present detailed maps to identify where rates must be increased to boost crop production and meet rising demands.

29 August 2012 in Nature
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
NMNathaniel D. Mueller
Nathaniel D. Mueller
JGJames S. Gerber
James S. Gerber
MJMatt Johnston
Matt Johnston
DRDeepak Ray
Deepak Ray
NRNavin Ramankutty
Navin Ramankutty
JFJonathan A. Foley
Jonathan A. Foley

22 January 2015 in Nature Communications
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
DRDeepak Ray
Deepak Ray
JGJames S. Gerber
James S. Gerber
GMGraham K. MacDonald
Graham K. MacDonald
PWPaul West
Paul West
Many studies have examined the role of mean climate change in agriculture, but an understanding of the influence of inter-annual climate variations on crop yields in different regions remains elusive. We use detailed crop statistics time series for ~13,500 political units to examine how recent climate variability led to variations in maize, rice, wheat and soybean crop yields worldwide. While some areas show no significant influence of climate variability, in substantial areas of the global breadbaskets, >60% of the yield variability can be explained by climate variability. Globally, climate variability accounts for roughly a third (~32–39%) of the observed yield variability. Our study uniquely illustrates spatial patterns in the relationship between climate variability and crop yield variability, highlighting where variations in temperature, precipitation or their interaction explain yield variability. We discuss key drivers for the observed variations to target further research and policy interventions geared towards buffering future crop production from climate variability.

1 January 2012 in Nature Communications
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
DRDeepak Ray
Deepak Ray
NRNavin Ramankutty
Navin Ramankutty
NMNathaniel D. Mueller
Nathaniel D. Mueller
PWPaul West
Paul West
JFJonathan A. Foley
Jonathan A. Foley

31 May 2019 in PLOS ONE
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
DRDeepak Ray
Deepak Ray
PWPaul West
Paul West
MCMichael Clark
Michael Clark
JGJames S. Gerber
James S. Gerber
Alexander PrishchepovAlexander Prishchepov
Alexander Prishchepov
SCSnigdhansu Chatterjee
Snigdhansu Chatterjee
Crop yields are projected to decrease under future climate conditions, and recent research suggests that yields have already been impacted. However, current impacts on a diversity of crops subnationally and implications for food security remains unclear. Here, we constructed linear regression relationships using weather and reported crop data to assess the potential impact of observed climate change on the yields of the top ten global crops–barley, cassava, maize, oil palm, rapeseed, rice, sorghum, soybean, sugarcane and wheat at ~20,000 political units. We find that the impact of global climate change on yields of different crops from climate trends ranged from -13.4% (oil palm) to 3.5% (soybean). Our results show that impacts are mostly negative in Europe, Southern Africa and Australia but generally positive in Latin America. Impacts in Asia and Northern and Central America are mixed. This has likely led to ~1% average reduction (-3.5 X 1013 kcal/year) in consumable food calories in these ten crops. In nearly half of food insecure countries, estimated caloric availability decreased. Our results suggest that climate change has already affected global food production.