Minerva Becker

Prof. Dr. Minerva Becker

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

32Years (1995-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
18 February 2016 in American Journal of Neuroradiology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SHSven Haller
Sven Haller
LEL. Etienne
L. Etienne
EVE. Ko Vari
E. Ko Vari
AVA. D. Varoquaux
A. D. Varoquaux
HUHorst Urbach
Horst Urbach
MBMinerva Becker
Minerva Becker
SUMMARY: Neurovascular compression syndromes are usually caused by arteries that directly contact the cisternal portion of a cranial nerve. Not all cases of neurovascular contact are clinically symptomatic. The transition zone between the central and peripheral myelin is the most vulnerable region for symptomatic neurovascular compression syndromes. Trigeminal neuralgia (cranial nerve V) has an incidence of 4–20/100,000, a transition zone of 4 mm, with symptomatic neurovascular compression typically proximal. Hemifacial spasm (cranial nerve VII) has an incidence of 1/100,000, a transition zone of 2.5 mm, with symptomatic neurovascular compression typically proximal. Vestibular paroxysmia (cranial nerve VIII) has an unknown incidence, a transition zone of 11 mm, with symptomatic neurovascular compression typically at the internal auditory canal. Glossopharyngeal neuralgia (cranial nerve IX) has an incidence of 0.5/100,000, a transition zone of 1.5 mm, with symptomatic neurovascular compression typically proximal. The transition zone overlaps the root entry zone close to the brain stem in cranial nerves V, VII, and IX, yet it is more distal and does not overlap the root entry zone in cranial nerve VIII. Although symptomatic neurovascular compression syndromes may also occur if the neurovascular contact is outside the transition zone, symptomatic neurovascular compression syndromes are more common if the neurovascular contact occurs at the transition zone or central myelin section, in particular when associated with nerve displacement and atrophy.

1 June 2008 in European Journal of Radiology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MBMinerva Becker
Minerva Becker
KBKarim Burkhardt
Karim Burkhardt
PDPavel Dulguerov
Pavel Dulguerov
AAAbdelkarim Allal
Abdelkarim Allal

26 August 2014 in Insights into Imaging
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
BPBela S. Purohit
Bela S. Purohit
AAAngeliki Ailianou
Angeliki Ailianou
NDNicolas Dulguerov
Nicolas Dulguerov
CBChristoph D. Becker
Christoph D. Becker
OROsman Ratib
Osman Ratib
MBMinerva Becker
Minerva Becker
Objectives Positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET/CT) with fluorine-18-fluorodeoxy-D-glucose (FDG) has evolved from a research modality to an invaluable tool in head and neck cancer imaging. However, interpretation of FDG PET/CT studies may be difficult due to the inherently complex anatomical landmarks, certain physiological variants and unusual patterns of high FDG uptake in the head and neck. The purpose of this article is to provide a comprehensive approach to key imaging features and interpretation pitfalls of FDG-PET/CT of the head and neck and how to avoid them. Methods We review the pathophysiological mechanisms leading to potentially false-positive and false-negative assessments, and we discuss the complementary use of high-resolution contrast-enhanced head and neck PET/CT (HR HN PET/CT) and additional cross-sectional imaging techniques, including ultrasound (US) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Results The commonly encountered false-positive PET/CT interpretation pitfalls are due to high FDG uptake by physiological causes, benign thyroid nodules, unilateral cranial nerve palsy and increased FDG uptake due to inflammation, recent chemoradiotherapy and surgery. False-negative findings are caused by lesion vicinity to structures with high glucose metabolism, obscuration of FDG uptake by dental hardware, inadequate PET scanner resolution and inherent low FDG-avidity of some tumours. Conclusions The interpreting physician must be aware of these unusual patterns of FDG uptake, as well as limitations of PET/CT as a modality, in order to avoid overdiagnosis of benign conditions as malignancy, as well as missing out on actual pathology. Teaching points • Knowledge of key imaging features of physiological and non-physiological FDG uptake is essential for the interpretation of head and neck PET/CT studies. • Precise anatomical evaluation and correlation with contrast-enhanced CT, US or MRI avoid PET/CT misinterpretation. • Awareness of unusual FDG uptake patterns avoids overdiagnosis of benign conditions as malignancy.

1 November 2008 in Radiology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MBMinerva Becker
Minerva Becker
PZPeter Zbären
Peter Zbären
JCJan Walther Casselman
Jan Walther Casselman
RKRomain Kohler
Romain Kohler
PDPavel Dulguerov
Pavel Dulguerov
CBChristoph D. Becker
Christoph D. Becker
To evaluate whether proposed diagnostic criteria applied to magnetic resonance (MR) images of patients with laryngeal and hypopharyngeal carcinoma may be used to distinguish neoplastic from inflammatory involvement of the laryngeal cartilages. The radiologic and histopathologic data in 121 consecutive patients with primary squamous cell carcinoma of the larynx (n = 63) or hypopharynx (n = 58) who underwent MR imaging before laryngectomy formed the basis of this retrospective study. Patient consent for retrospective chart review was waived by the institutional review board. All laryngectomy specimens were processed with a dedicated histopathologic whole-organ slice technique. MR images were evaluated by two readers according to established ("old") and proposed ("new") diagnostic criteria on the basis of the signal intensity behavior of cartilage on T2-weighted images and contrast material-enhanced T1-weighted images compared with that of the adjacent tumor. Specifically, with the new criteria, T2-weighted or postcontrast T1-weighted cartilage signal intensity greater than that of the adjacent tumor was considered to indicate inflammation, and signal intensity similar to that of the adjacent tumor was considered to indicate neoplastic invasion. The results of the MR image interpretation were compared with the histologic reference standard. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for the new criteria (0.94) was nominally but significantly larger than that for the old criteria (0.92) (P = .01). Overall specificity was significantly improved (82% for new vs 74% for old criteria, P < .001) and was greatest for the thyroid cartilage (75% for new vs 54% for old criteria, P < .001) with the new criteria. The sensitivities of the established and the proposed criteria were identical. The proposed MR imaging criteria enable improved differentiation of neoplastic cartilage invasion from peritumoral inflammation.

31 October 2015 in Insights into Imaging
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
BPBela S. Purohit
Bela S. Purohit
MVMaria Isabel Vargas
Maria Isabel Vargas
AAAngeliki Ailianou
Angeliki Ailianou
LMLaura Merlini
Laura Merlini
PPPierre-Alexandre Poletti
Pierre-Alexandre Poletti
MBMinerva Becker
Minerva Becker
Although the orbit is a small anatomical space, the wide range of structures present within it are often the site of origin of various tumours and tumour-like conditions, both in adults and children. Cross-sectional imaging is mandatory for the detection, characterization, and mapping of these lesions. This review focuses on multiparametric imaging of orbital tumours. Each tumour is reviewed in relation to its clinical presentation, compartmental location, imaging characteristics, and its histological features. We herein describe orbital tumours as lesions of the globe (retinoblastoma, uveal melanoma), optic nerve sheath complex (meningioma, optic nerve glioma), conal-intraconal compartment (hemangioma), extraconal compartment (dermoid/epidermoid, lacrimal gland tumours, lymphoma, rhabdomysarcoma), and bone and sinus compartment (fibrous dysplasia). Lesions without any typical compartmental localization and those with multi-compartment involvement (veno-lymphatic malformation, plexiform neurofibroma, idiopathic orbital pseudotumour, IgG4 related disease, metastases) are also reviewed. We discuss the role of advanced imaging techniques, such as MR diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), diffusion tensor imaging, fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography CT (FDG-PET CT), and positron emission tomography MRI (MRI PET) as problem-solving tools in the evaluation of those orbital masses that present with non-specific morphologic imaging findings. Main messages/Teaching points • A compartment-based approach is essential for the diagnosis of orbital tumours. • CT and MRI play a key role in the work-up of orbital tumours. • DWI, PET CT, and MRI PET are complementary tools to solve diagnostic dilemmas. • Awareness of salient imaging pearls and diagnostic pitfalls avoids interpretation errors.

10 December 2013 in Insights into Imaging
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
LALaurène Avril
Laurène Avril
TLTommaso Lombardi
Tommaso Lombardi
AAAngeliki Ailianou
Angeliki Ailianou
KBKarim Burkhardt
Karim Burkhardt
AVArthur Varoquaux
Arthur Varoquaux
MBMinerva Becker
Minerva Becker
Objectives Radiolucent mandibular lesions seen on panoramic radiographs develop from both odontogenic and non-odontogenic structures. They represent a broad spectrum of lesions with a varying degree of malignant potential. The purpose of this review is to illustrate the characteristic imaging findings—as well as the clinical and histological features—of common and uncommon radiolucent lesions of the mandible. Methods This review article is based on the retrospective evaluation of 11,725 panoramic radiographs seen in our institution during the past 6 years. It provides a comprehensive, practical approach to the radiological interpretation of radiolucent lesions of the mandible. To facilitate the diagnostic approach, we have classified radiolucent lesions into two groups: lesions with well-defined borders and those with ill-defined borders. Results Lesion prevalence, age of manifestation, location within the mandible, relationship to dental structures, effect on adjacent structures and characteristic findings at computed tomography (CT), cone beam CT (CBCT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) are discussed. Pitfalls including malignant lesions mimicking benign disease and pseudo-lesions are equally addressed. Conclusion Knowledge of the characteristic imaging features of radiolucent mandibular lesions narrows the differential diagnosis and is crucial for the identification of those lesions, where biopsy is indicated for definitive histology. Teaching points • Panoramic X-rays, CT and MRI are essential for the work-up of radiolucent mandibular lesions. • Lesion borders, location within the mandible, relationship to dental structures and tissue characteristics on cross-sectional imaging are indispensable to narrow the differential diagnosis. • High-resolution CT and CBCT play a major role for the assessment of lesion margins and their relationship to important anatomic structures, such as the inferior alveolar nerve. • Although most radiolucent lesions with well-defined sclerotic borders are benign, MRI may reveal clinically unsuspected malignant disease.