Fabio Carlevaro

Dr. Fabio Carlevaro

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

6Years (2021-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
20 July 2022 in Psychology of Sport and Exercise
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
DMDaniele Magistro
Daniele Magistro
SCSimon B. Cooper
Simon B. Cooper
FCFabio Carlevaro
Fabio Carlevaro
IMIlaria Marchetti
Ilaria Marchetti
FMFrancesca Magno
Francesca Magno
GMGiovanni Musella
Giovanni Musella

17 May 2024 in Scandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
CMClarice Martins
Clarice Martins
Kip WebsterKip Webster
Kip Webster
VICENTE ROMO-PEREZVICENTE ROMO-PEREZ
VICENTE ROMO-PEREZ
Michael DuncanMichael Duncan
Michael Duncan
LLLuis Lemos
Luis Lemos
Lisa M. BarnettLisa M. Barnett
Lisa M. Barnett

25 September 2023 in Sports Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
CMClarice Martins
Clarice Martins
VICENTE ROMO-PEREZVICENTE ROMO-PEREZ
VICENTE ROMO-PEREZ
Kip WebsterKip Webster
Kip Webster
Michael DuncanMichael Duncan
Michael Duncan
LLLuis Lemos
Luis Lemos
Lisa M. BarnettLisa M. Barnett
Lisa M. Barnett

RBRuth Boat
Ruth Boat
Simon CooperSimon Cooper
Simon Cooper
FCFabio Carlevaro
Fabio Carlevaro
FMFrancesca Magno
Francesca Magno
GBGiulia Bardaglio
Giulia Bardaglio
DMDaniele Magistro
Daniele Magistro
The aim of the present study was to examine the effects of physically active lessons, implemented through the Mathematics and English Language curriculum, on cognitive function and gross motor skill development. Following ethical approval, 192 children aged 8–9 years were randomly allocated to an intervention group (n = 98) or a control group (n = 94). The intervention consisted of 8 h.wk−1 of physically active lessons, equally split between Mathematics and English Language, for 16 weeks. Cognitive function (digit span, coding and arithmetic reasoning) and gross motor skill development (TGMD-3) were assessed at baseline and follow-up. The improvement in every domain of cognitive function was greater in the intervention group compared to the control group (group * time, p = 0.008–0.023, d = 0.34–0.42). Furthermore, total TGMD-3 score (group * time, p < 0.001, d = 1.16) and both sub-scales (locomotor, p < 0.001, d = 0.63; object control, p < 0.001, d = 1.29) also improved by a greater extent in the intervention group than in the control group. These findings suggest that 16 weeks of physically active lessons, taught in both Mathematics and English Language curriculum, synergistically improved cognitive function and gross motor skill development in primary school children aged 8–9 years.

21 June 2024 in Children
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Cristiana D'AnnaCristiana D'Anna
Cristiana D'Anna
FCFabio Carlevaro
Fabio Carlevaro
FMFrancesca Magno
Francesca Magno
RVRoberto Vagnetti
Roberto Vagnetti
PLPierpaolo Limone
Pierpaolo Limone
DMDaniele Magistro
Daniele Magistro
Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is among the most prevalent disorders in children and is frequently linked with motor difficulties that can impact both daily motor tasks and overall developmental trajectories. The objective of this study was to analyse the association between gross motor skills and ADHD symptoms. Using a cross-sectional research design, data were collected from a sample of primary school children (N = 2677; mean age = 8.58 years, SD = 1.49 years). The Gross Motor Development-3 Test (TGMD-3) was employed to assess participants’ gross motor skills, whereas the ADHD Rating Scale (SDAI), completed by teachers, evaluated ADHD symptoms through two subscales: inattention and impulsivity/hyperactivity. The results revealed an association between motor development and ADHD symptoms, with greater proficiency in gross motor skills correlating with lower symptoms reported on the SDAI. Logistic regression analyses indicated that the TGMD-3 was significantly associated with the risk of ADHD in matched samples of at-risk children and controls. The evaluation of gross motor development proves to be a useful tool for monitoring global development, paying attention to any critical issues, particularly in relation to the variables of inattention and hyperactivity.

DMDaniele Magistro
Daniele Magistro
FCFabio Carlevaro
Fabio Carlevaro
FMFrancesca Magno
Francesca Magno
MSMartina Simon
Martina Simon
NCNicola Camp
Nicola Camp
GMGiovanni Musella
Giovanni Musella
The socio-economic and health consequences of our ageing population are well documented, with older adults living in long-term care facilities amongst the frailest possessing specific and significant healthcare and social care needs. These needs may be exacerbated through the sedentary behaviour which is prevalent within care home settings. Reducing sedentary time can reduce the risk of many diseases and improve functional health, implying that improvements in health may be gained by simply helping older adults substitute time spent sitting with time spent standing or in light-intensity ambulation. This study identified the impact of 1 year of lifestyle intervention in a group of older adults living in a long-term care setting in Italy. One hundred and eleven older adults (mean age, 82.37 years; SD = 10.55 years) participated in the study. Sixty-nine older adults were in the intervention group (35 without severe cognitive decline and 34 with dementia) and 42 older adults were in the control group. Data on physical functioning, basic activities of daily living (BADL) and mood were collected 4 times, before, during (every four months) and after the 1 year of intervention. The lifestyle intervention focused on improving the amount of time spent every week in active behaviour and physical activity (minimum 150 min of weekly activities). All participants completed the training program and no adverse events, related to the program, occurred. The intervention group showed steady and significant improvements in physical functioning and a stable situation in BADL and mood following the intervention in older adults with and without dementia, whilst the control group exhibited a significant decline over time. These results suggest that engagement in a physical activity intervention may benefit care home residents with and without dementia both physically and mentally, leading to improved social care and a reduced burden on healthcare services.