Obesity increases the risk of clinical decompensation in cirrhosis, possibly by increasing portal pressure. Whether weight reduction can be safely achieved through lifestyle (LS) changes (diet and exercise) in overweight/obese patients with cirrhosis, and if weight loss reduces portal pressure in this setting, is unknown. This prospective, multicentric, uncontrolled pilot study enrolled patients with compensated cirrhosis, portal hypertension (hepatic venous pressure gradient [HVPG] ≥6 mm Hg), and body mass index (BMI) ≥26 kg/m² in an intensive 16‐week LS intervention program (personalized hypocaloric normoproteic diet and 60 min/wk of supervised physical activity). We measured HVPG, body weight (BW) and composition, adipokines, health‐related quality of life, and safety data before and after the intervention. Changes in HVPG and BW were predefined as clinically relevant if ≥10% and ≥5%, respectively. Safety and BW were reassessed after 6 months. 60 patients were included and 50 completed the study (56 ± 8 years old; 62% male; nonalcoholic steatohepatitis etiology 24%; BMI 33.3 ± 3.2 kg/m²; Child A 92%; HVPG ≥10 mm Hg, 72%). LS intervention significantly decreased BW (average, –5.0 ± 4.0 kg; P < 0.0001), by ≥5% in 52% and ≥10% in 16%. HVPG also significantly decreased (from 13.9 ± 5.6 to 12.3 ± 5.2 mm Hg; P < 0.0001), by ≥10% in 42% and ≥20% in 24%. A ≥10% BW loss was associated with a greater decrease in HVPG (–23.7 ± 19.9% vs. –8.2 ± 16.6%; P = 0.024). No episodes of clinical decompensation occurred. Weight loss achieved at 16 weeks was maintained at 6 months; Child and Model for End‐Stage Liver Disease scores did not change. Conclusion: Sixteen weeks of diet and moderate exercise were safe and reduced BW and portal pressure in overweight/obese patients with cirrhosis and portal hypertension. (Hepatology 2017;65:1293‐1305).

It is well established that portal hypertension can occur in the absence of cirrhosis, as reported in patients with immune disorders, infections and thrombophilia. However, similar histological abnormalities primarily affecting the hepatic sinusoidal and (peri)portal vasculature have also been observed in patients without portal hypertension. Thus, the term porto-sinusoidal vascular disorder (PSVD) has recently been introduced to describe a group of vascular diseases of the liver featuring lesions encompassing the portal venules and sinusoids, irrespective of the presence/absence of portal hypertension. Liver biopsy is fundamental for PSVD diagnosis. Specific histology findings include nodular regenerative hyperplasia, obliterative portal venopathy/portal vein stenosis and incomplete septal fibrosis/cirrhosis. Since other conditions including alcohol-related and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease, or viral hepatitis, or the presence of portal vein thrombosis may occur in patients with PSVD, their relative contribution to liver damage should be carefully assessed. In addition to histology and clinical diagnostic criteria, imaging and non-invasive tests such as liver and spleen stiffness measurements could aid in the diagnostic workup. The introduction of PSVD as a novel clinical entity will facilitate collaborative studies and investigations into the underlying molecular pathomechanisms encompassed by this term.

The concept of ‘cirrhosis’ is evolving and it is now clear that compensated and decompensated cirrhosis are completely different in terms of prognosis. Furthermore, the term ‘advanced chronic liver disease (ACLD)’ better reflects the continuum of histological changes occurring in the liver, which continue to progress even after cirrhosis has developed, and might regress after removing the etiological factor causing the liver disease. In compensated ACLD, portal hypertension marks the progression to a stage with higher risk of clinical complication and requires an appropriate evaluation and treatment. Invasive tests to diagnose cirrhosis (liver biopsy) and portal hypertension (hepatic venous pressure gradient measurement and endoscopy) remain of crucial importance in several difficult clinical scenarios, but their need can be reduced by using different non-invasive tests in standard cases. Among non-invasive tests, the accepted use, major limitations and major benefits of serum markers of fibrosis, elastography and imaging methods are summarized in the present review.