Paxlovid was granted an Emergency Use Authorization for the treatment of mild to moderate coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), based on the interim analysis of the Evaluation of Protease Inhibition for COVID-19 in High-Risk Patients (EPIC-HR) trial. Paxlovid effectiveness needs to be assessed in a noncontrolled setting. In this study we used population-based real-world data to evaluate the effectiveness of Paxlovid. The database of the largest healthcare provider in Israel was used to identify all adults aged 18 years or older with first-ever positive test for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 between January and February 2022, who were at high risk for severe COVID-19 and had no contraindications for Paxlovid use. Patients were included irrespective of their COVID-19 vaccination status. Cox hazard regression was used to estimate the 28-day hazard ratio (HR) for severe COVID-19 or mortality with Paxlovid examined as time-dependent variable. Overall, 180 351 eligible patients were included; of these, only 4737 (2.6%) were treated with Paxlovid, and 135 482 (75.1%) had adequate COVID-19 vaccination status. Both Paxlovid and adequate COVID-19 vaccination status were associated with significant decrease in the rate of severe COVID-19 or mortality with adjusted HRs of 0.54 (95% confidence interval [CI], .39–.75) and 0.20 (95% CI, .17–.22), respectively. Paxlovid appears to be more effective in older patients, immunosuppressed patients, and patients with underlying neurological or cardiovascular disease (interaction P < .05 for all). No significant interaction was detected between Paxlovid treatment and COVID-19 vaccination status. This study suggests that in the era of Omicron and in real-life settings, Paxlovid is highly effective in reducing the risk of severe COVID-19 or mortality.

Background: Molnupiravir was granted emergency use authorization for the treatment of mild to moderate coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). In this study, we used population-based real-world data to evaluate the effectiveness of molnupiravir. Methods: The database of the largest healthcare provider in Israel was used to identify all adults with first-ever positive test for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) performed in the community during January–February 2022, who were at high risk for severe COVID-19, and had no contraindications for molnupiravir use. Patients were included regardless of SARS-CoV-2 vaccination status. A total of 2661 patients who received molnupiravir were propensity score matched with 2661 patients who have not received molnupiravir (control group). Patients were followed through 10 March 2022 for up to 28 days for the first occurrence of the composite severe COVID-19 or COVID-19-specific mortality. Results: The composite outcome occurred in 50 patients in the molnupiravir group and 60 patients in the control group. Molnupiravir was associated with a nonsignificant reduced risk of the composite outcome: hazard ratio, 0.83 (95% confidence interval, .57–1.21). However, subgroup analyses showed that molnupiravir was associated with a significant decrease in the risk of the composite outcome in older patients 0.54 (0.34–0.86), in females 0.41 (0.22–0.77), and in patients with inadequate COVID-19 vaccination 0.45 (0.25–0.82). The results were similar when each component of the composite outcome was examined separately. Conclusions: This study suggests that in the era of Omicron and in real-life setting, molnupiravir might be effective in reducing the risk of severe COVID-19 and COVID-19-related mortality, particularly in specific subgroups.

Tixagevimab and cilgavimab, a combined monoclonal antibody (Evusheld), was granted emergency use authorization for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) preexposure prophylaxis in individuals with immunocompromising conditions. In this study we used population-based real-world data to evaluate the effectiveness of Evusheld in immunocompromised patients. Using the computerized database of the largest healthcare provider in Israel, we identified all adult immunocompromised patients who were eligible to receive Evusheld (150 mg tixagevimab and 150 mg cilgavimab) on 15 February 2022. Patients with a documentation of a prior SARS-CoV-2 infection were excluded. A total of 703 patients who received Evusheld were propensity score matched, using a ratio of 1:4, with 2812 patients who had not received Evusheld (control group). Patients were followed through 30 June 2022 for up to 90 days for the first documentation of SARS-CoV-2 infection and coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)–related hospitalization. Overall, 72 patients in the Evusheld group and 377 patients in the control group had SARS-CoV-2 infection, reflecting an incidence rate of 4.18 and 5.64 per 100 person-months, respectively. The hazard ratios were 0.75 (95% confidence interval [CI]: .58–.96) for SARS-CoV-2 infection and 0.41 (95% CI: .19–.89) for COVID-19–related hospitalization in the Evusheld group compared to the control group. The magnitude of relative risk reduction of each outcome was greater in nonobese patients (P for interaction = .020 and .045, respectively). This study suggests that Evusheld is effective in reducing the risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection and COVID-19 hospitalization in immunocompromised patients. The effectiveness of this dose appears to be greater in nonobese patients.

Background and Objectives: Existing data regarding occurrence of Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) following COVID-19 infection and vaccination are inconclusive. We aimed to assess the association between GBS and both SARS-CoV-2 infection and COVID-19 vaccine. Methods: We conducted a nested-case control study in a cohort of 3,193,951 patients aged≥16 years, without a diagnosis of prior GBS, from the largest healthcare provider in Israel. Subjects were followed from January 1^st, 2021, until June 30^th, 2022, for the occurrence of GBS. Ten randomly selected controls were matched to each case of GBS on age and sex. We assessed both SARS-CoV-2 infection and COVID-19 vaccine administration in the prior 6 weeks in cases and controls. Results: Overall, 76 patients were diagnosed with GBS during follow-up and were matched to 760 controls. A positive test for SARS-CoV-2 was detected in 9 (11.8%) cases, and 18 (2.4%) controls. An administration of COVID-19 vaccine was detected in 8 (10.5%) cases (all Pfizer-BioNTech [BNT162b2] vaccine), and 136 (17.9%) controls (134 Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine). Multivariable conditional logistic regression models showed that the OR for GBS associated with SARS-CoV-2 infection and COVID-19 vaccine administration was 6.30 (95% CI 2.55-15.56) and 0.41 (95% CI 0.17-0.96), respectively. The results were similar when exposure to SARS-CoV-2 infection or COVID-19 vaccine administration were ascertained in the prior 4 and 8 weeks, although did not reach statistical significance for COVID-19 vaccine at 4 weeks. Conclusions: Our study suggests that SARS-CoV-2 infection is associated with increased risk of GBS, while Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine is associated with decreased risk of GBS.

We used Fourier-transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy to analyze 4 carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii outbreaks. FTIR distinguished between isolates from different hospitals and uncovered the relatedness between isolates from acute-care hospitals and a post–acute-care hospital. Using higher cutoffs reveals more distant relationships and lower cutoffs support analyses of recent events.