John Cheville

Dr. John Cheville

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

28Years (1999-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 May 2003 in American Journal of Surgical Pathology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JCJohn Cheville
John Cheville
CLChristine M. Lohse
Christine M. Lohse
HZHorst Zincke
Horst Zincke
AWAmy L. Weaver
Amy L. Weaver
MBMichael L. Blute
Michael L. Blute
Our objective was to compare cancer-specific survival and to examine associations with outcome among the histologic subtypes of renal cell carcinoma (RCC). We studied 2385 patients whose first surgery between 1970 and 2000 was a radical nephrectomy for sporadic, unilateral RCC. All RCC tumors were classified following the 1997 Union Internationale Contre le Cancer and American Joint Committee on Cancer guidelines. There were 1985 (83.2%) patients with clear cell, 270 (11.3%) with papillary, 102 (4.3%) with chromophobe, 6 (0.3%) with collecting duct, 5 (0.3%) with purely sarcomatoid RCC and no underlying histologic subtype, and 17 (0.7%) with RCC, not otherwise specified. Cancer-specific survival rates at 5 years for patients with clear cell, papillary, and chromophobe RCC were 68.9%, 87.4%, and 86.7%, respectively. Patients with clear cell RCC had a poorer prognosis compared with patients with papillary and chromophobe RCC (p <0.001). This difference in outcome was observed even after stratifying by 1997 tumor stage and nuclear grade. There was no significant difference in cancer-specific survival between patients with papillary and chromophobe RCC (p = 0.918). The 1997 TNM stage, tumor size, presence of a sarcomatoid component, and nuclear grade were significantly associated with death from clear cell, papillary, and chromophobe RCC. Histologic tumor necrosis was significantly associated with death from clear cell and chromophobe RCC, but not with death from papillary RCC. Our results demonstrate that there are significant differences in outcome and associations with outcome for the different histologic subtypes of RCC, highlighting the need for accurate subtyping.

1 December 2002
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
IFIgor Frank
Igor Frank
MBMichael L Blute
Michael L Blute
JCJohn Cheville
John Cheville
CLChristine M Lohse
Christine M Lohse
AWAmy L Weaver
Amy L Weaver
HZHorst Zincke
Horst Zincke
Currently outcome prediction in renal cell carcinoma is largely based on pathological stage and tumor grade. We developed an outcome prediction model for patients treated with radical nephrectomy for clear cell renal cell carcinoma, which was based on all available clinical and pathological features significantly associated with death from renal cell carcinoma. We identified 1,801 adult patients with unilateral clear cell renal cell carcinoma treated with radical nephrectomy between 1970 and 1998. Clinical features examined included age, sex, smoking history, and signs and symptoms at presentation. Pathological features examined included 1997 TNM stage, tumor size, nuclear grade, histological tumor necrosis, sarcomatoid component, cystic architecture, multifocality and surgical margin status. Cancer specific survival was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to test associations between features studied and outcome. The selection of features included in the multivariate model was validated using bootstrap methodology. Mean followup was 9.7 years (range 0.1 to 31). Estimated cancer specific survival rates at 1, 3, 5, 7 and 10 years were 86.6%, 74.0%, 68.7%, 63.8% and 60.0%, respectively. Several features were multivariately associated with death from clear cell renal cell carcinoma, including 1997 TNM stage (p <0.001), tumor size 5 cm. or greater (p <0.001), nuclear grade (p <0.001) and histological tumor necrosis (p <0.001). In patients with clear cell renal cell carcinoma 1997 TNM stage, tumor size, nuclear grade and histological tumor necrosis were significantly associated with cancer specific survival. We present a scoring system based on these features that can be used to predict outcome.

1 April 2004 in American Journal of Surgical Pathology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JCJohn Cheville
John Cheville
CLChristine M Lohse
Christine M Lohse
HZHorst Zincke
Horst Zincke
AWAmy L Weaver
Amy L Weaver
BLBradley C Leibovich
Bradley C Leibovich
MBMichael L Blute
Michael L Blute
A sarcomatoid component can occur in all histologic subtypes of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) and indicates an aggressive tumor. We studied 2381 patients treated with radical nephrectomy for RCC between 1970 and 2000. A urologic pathologist reviewed the microscopic slides from all tumor specimens for the presence of a sarcomatoid component, defined as a RCC with any malignant spindle cell component. All tumors with a sarcomatoid component were classified as nuclear grade 4. A total of 120 (5.0%) patients had RCC with a sarcomatoid component, including 94 who died of RCC at a mean of 1.4 years following nephrectomy (median 8 months; range 44 days to 10 years). Cancer-specific survival rates at 2 and 5 years following nephrectomy were 33.3% and 14.5%, respectively. The presence of distant metastases at the radical nephrectomy and histologic tumor necrosis were significantly associated with death from RCC among patients with sarcomatoid RCC. Patients with clear cell (conventional) RCC and chromophobe RCC were more likely to have tumors with a sarcomatoid component (5.2% and 8.7%, respectively) compared with patients with papillary RCC (1.9%). The presence of a sarcomatoid component was significantly associated with death from RCC for all three subtypes (P < 0.001). Even among patients with grade 4 clear cell RCC, the presence of a sarcomatoid component was significantly associated with outcome, both univariately (risk ratio 1.59; P = 0.010) and after adjusting for TNM stage, tumor size, and histologic tumor necrosis (risk ratio 1.46; P = 0.037).

1 May 2002
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
KHKevin C Halling
Kevin C Halling
WKWalter King
Walter King
ISIrina A Sokolova
Irina A Sokolova
RKR. Jeffrey Karnes
R. Jeffrey Karnes
RMReid G Meyer
Reid G Meyer
DODennis J O'Kane
Dennis J O'Kane

19 August 2002 in Cancer
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JCJohn Cheville
John Cheville
DTDonald Tindall
Donald Tindall
CBChristopher Boelter
Christopher Boelter
RJRobert Jenkins
Robert Jenkins
CLChristine M. Lohse
Christine M. Lohse
MBMichael L. Blute
Michael L. Blute
BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to examine the clinical and pathologic features of metastatic prostate carcinoma to bone in a large cohort of men, and the associations of these features with outcome.METHODS: Sixty‐eight men who underwent surgery for metastatic prostate carcinoma to bone for stabilization of a pathologic fracture or impending fracture were studied. Clinical characteristics included the type of treatment for the primary and metastatic prostate carcinoma, age and serum prostate specific antigen (PSA) at the diagnosis of the metastatic prostate carcinoma, radiographic findings of the metastasis (osteoblastic, osteolytic, or mixed), and the number of metastatic sites at the time of the surgery for the metastasis. Pathologic features examined included Gleason score of the metastatic prostate carcinoma. Immunohistochemical stains for MIB‐1, cytokeratin, PSA, synaptophysin, chromogranin A, serotonin, estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, and androgen receptor were performed for all cases. The Kaplan–Meier method was used to estimate cancer‐specific survival. The duration of follow‐up was defined as the interval from the date of surgery for the metastasis to the date of death or last follow‐up. Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards models were fit to assess the features that were associated with death from prostate carcinoma.RESULTS: The average (standard deviation) time from the surgery for the metastasis to death from prostate carcinoma was 1.5 (1.9) years, ranging from 0 days to 10 years, with a median of 1 year. The estimated cancer‐specific survival rates at 1 year, 2 years, and 3 years were 54.3%, 28.8%, and 22.9%, respectively. Median cancer‐specific survival occurred at 1.1 years. After 4 years of follow‐up, there were only seven patients left at risk for death from prostate carcinoma. Features that were found to be significantly associated with death from prostate carcinoma univariately included the interval between the diagnosis of metastasis and the surgery for metastasis (P < 0.001), androgen deprivation therapy before surgery for the metastasis (P = 0.002), presentation with metastasis (P = 0.003), the number of metastatic sites (P = 0.034), Gleason score of the metastasis (P = 0.002), and tumor positivity for chromogranin A (P = 0.041). On multivariate analysis, the interval between the diagnosis of metastasis and the surgery for metastasis (P < 0.001), Gleason score of the metastasis (P < 0.001), and tumor positivity for chromogranin A (P = 0.009) were associated significantly with death from prostate carcinoma.CONCLUSIONS: Although cancer‐specific survival for patients after surgery for prostate carcinoma metastatic to bone is poor, assessments of tumor differentiation of the metastasis and chromogranin A positivity provide prognostic information. Cancer 2002;95:1028–36. © 2002 American Cancer Society.DOI 10.1002/cncr.10788

1 August 1999 in Urologic Clinics of North America
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JCJohn Cheville
John Cheville