The elbow is prone to stiffness after trauma. To regain functional elbow motion several conservative- and surgical treatment options are available. Conservative treatment includes physical therapy, intra-articular injections with corticosteroids and a static progressive or dynamic splinting program. If conservative treatment fails, an operative release of the posttraumatic stiff elbow is often performed. The best Evidence-Based rehabilitation protocol for patients after an operative release is unknown to date and differs per surgeon, hospital and country. Options include early- or delayed motion supervised by a physical therapist, immediate continuous passive motion (CPM), (night) splinting and a static progressive or dynamic splinting program. The SET-Study (Stiff Elbow Trial) is a single-centre, prospective, randomized controlled trial. The primary objective of this study is to compare the active Range of Motion (ROM) (flexion arc and rotational arc) twelve months after surgery between three groups. The first group will receive in-hospital CPM in combination with early motion Physical Therapy (PT) supervised by a physical therapist, the second group will receive only in-hospital early motion PT supervised by a physical therapist and the third group will receive outpatient supervised PT from postoperative day seven till ten. Secondary outcome measures will be Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) including the Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS), the Oxford Elbow Score (OES), the quick Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder and Hand (qDASH) score, Visual Analogue pain Scale in rest and activity (VAS), Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS), the Short Form (SF)-36, the Centre for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale Revised (CESD-R) and the Work Rehabilitation Questionnaire (WORQ) for the upper limb. A successful completion of this trial will provide evidence on the best rehabilitation protocol in order to (re)gain optimal motion after surgical release of the stiff elbow. The trial is registered at the Dutch Trial Register: NTR6067 , 31–8-2016.

There is no consensus about the optimal treatment strategy for frozen shoulders (FS). Conservative treatment consisting of intra-articular corticosteroid infiltrations and physiotherapy are considered appropriate for most patients. However, with a conservative strategy, patients experience a prolonged rehabilitation period with a considerable amount of pain and disabilities in daily life. Also, at long term, a residual amount of pain and restriction of range of motion is frequently reported. Manipulation under anesthesia is a short and relative simple procedure with the potential to rapidly reduce symptoms and restore the range of motion. The objective of this trial is to evaluate the effectiveness of MUA followed by a PT program compared to a PT program alone, in the treatment of patients with a stage two FS. We hypothesize that the course of the disease can be shortened with MUA with a quicker functional recovery. This is a prospective, single center, randomized controlled trial. Eligible patients will be allocated to either the manipulation (MUA) group or the physiotherapy alone (PT) group. In the MUA group manipulation will be performed under interscalene block, directly followed by an intensive physiotherapy treatment protocol, with the goal to maintain the obtained range of motion. Patients allocated to the PT group are given advice and education and receive a written protocol to hand out to their physical therapist based on the recent guideline of the Dutch Shoulder Network for the treatment of frozen shoulders. Descriptive statistics will be used to describe the sample size, patients demographics, presence of diabetes mellitus, range of motion, duration of symptoms till randomization and will be presented for each treatment group. The SPADI is used as primary functional outcome parameter. Secondary outcome parameters are; OSS, NPRS, EQ-5D 3-L, passive range of motion, WORQ-UP, duration of symptoms, usage of analgesics and adverse events. A sample size of 41 subjects in each group was calculated. Follow up is planned after 1,3 and 12 months. The length of physiotherapy treatment in both groups is variable, depending on individual progression. Differences between groups in outcome parameters will be analysed using the linear mixed modelling and the restricted maximum likelihood ratio technique for estimating the model parameters. Successful completion of this trial will provide evidence on the best treatment strategy for patients with a stage two frozen shoulder. The results of this study can lead to a better understanding for the role of manipulation in the treatment of frozen shoulders. This trial is registered in the Dutch Trial Register under the number NTR6182 on the 20th of February 2017.

Children often present at the emergency department with a suspected elbow fracture. Sometimes, the only radiological finding is a ‘fat pad sign’ (FPS) as a result of hydrops or haemarthros. This sign could either be the result of a fracture, or be due to an intra-articular haematoma without a concomitant fracture. There are no uniform treatment guidelines for this common population. The aims of this study were (1) to obtain insight into FPS definition, diagnosis, and treatment amongst international colleagues, and (2) to identify a uniform definition based on radiographic measurements with optimal cut-off points via a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. An online international survey was set up to assess the diagnostic and treatment strategies, criteria, and definitions of the FPS, the probability of an occult fracture, and the presence of an anterior and/or posterior FPS on 20 radiographs. Additionally, the research team performed radiographic measurements to identify cut-off values for a positive FPS, as well as test–retest reliability and inter-rater reliability via intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC). A total of 133 (paediatric) orthopaedic surgeons completed the survey. Definitions, further diagnostics, and treatments varied considerably amongst respondents. Angle measurements of the fat pad as related to the humeral axis line showed the highest reliability (test–retest ICC, 0.95 (95% CI 0.88–0.98); inter-rater ICC, 0.95 (95% CI 0.91–0.98)). A cut-off angle of 16° was defined a positive anterior FPS (sensitivity, 1.00; specificity, 0.87; accuracy, 99%), based on the respondents’ assessment of the radiographs in combination with the research team’s measurements. Any visible posterior fat pad was defined as a positive posterior FPS. This study provides insight into the current diagnosis and treatment of children with a radiological fat pad sign of the elbow. A clear, objective definition of a positive anterior FPS was identified as a ≥16° angle with respect to the anterior humeral line.

Lateral humeral condyle fractures are frequently seen in pediatric patients and have a high risk of unfavorable outcomes. A fall on the outstretched arm with supination of the forearm is the most common trauma mechanism. A physical examination combined with additional imaging will confirm the diagnosis. Several classifications have been described to categorize these fractures based on location and comminution. Treatment options depend on the severity of the fracture and consist of immobilization in a cast, closed reduction with percutaneous fixation, and open reduction with fixation. These fractures can lead to notable complications such as lateral condyle overgrowth, surgical site infection, pin tract infections, stiffness resulting in decreased range of motion, cubitus valgus deformities, ‘fishtail’ deformities, malunion, non-union, avascular necrosis, and premature epiphyseal fusion. Adequate follow-up is therefore warranted.

Background: Non-invasive treatment options are preferred for managing upper extremity pain due to osteoarthritis (OA). Transcutaneous pulsed radiofrequency (TcPRF) is a promising technique and appears effective in managing knee and shoulder pain. Objectives: To investigate whether TcPRF treatment is effective in reducing pain and safe to use among patients with OA of the upper extremity. Methods: In this retrospective study, patients with painful OA of the upper extremity who underwent TcPRF treatment from February 2021 to February 2022 were included. The primary outcome measure was the change in NRS pain scores between baseline and 1, 2, and 6 weeks of follow-up. Secondary outcome measures included adverse events. Data were extracted from electronic medical records and via telephone consultation after the 6-week follow-up. Results: A total of 41 initial TcPRF treatments were performed among 37 patients. The NRS score at rest showed a statistically significant improvement at 6 weeks [median = 5 [interquartile range (IQR) 2 - 8)] compared with baseline [median = 6 (IQR 4 - 8)], P = 0.023, with a moderate effect size, r = -0.44. For NRS scores during activity, all follow-up moments had lower NRS scores [median = 7 (IQR 5 - 8)] than before TcPRF [median = 8 (IQR 7 - 9)], P = 0.002 - 0.006, with moderate to large effect sizes, r = -0.45 to r = -0.51. No adverse events were reported. Conclusions: Transcutaneous pulsed radiofrequency treatment is effective in reducing pain and is safe to use among patients with upper extremity pain due to OA.

New surgical approaches have been developed to optimize functional outcomes after total elbow arthroplasty (TEA). Historically, the triceps-detaching approach was predominantly used, involving partial release of the triceps tendon to improve surgical exposure, at the cost of a higher risk of postoperative extensor weakness. More recently, there has been a shift toward triceps-sparing techniques, in which the triceps tendon is preserved at the cost of limited articular visibility, possibly risking component malalignment. There is no consensus on the best surgical approach and prospective studies are lacking. This study aims to investigate the functional outcomes, prosthetic component positioning, and complication rates after a triceps-sparing and a triceps-detaching approach in TEA. A multicenter prospective comparative non-randomized cohort study was conducted. All patients with an indication for primary TEA were enrolled in either a triceps-sparing or a triceps-detaching cohort. Primary outcome measure was elbow dysfunction, specified as fixed flexion deformity (FFD). Secondary outcome parameters were objectively measured physical functioning (including triceps force), self-reported physical functioning, prosthetic component positioning in standard radiographs, and complications. Data will be analyzed using multilevel modelling. A total of 55 patients were included in each cohort; 46 patients were available for 12 months follow-up in the triceps-sparing cohort and 47 patients in the triceps-detaching cohort. Baseline characteristics did not differ between groups, except for sex. Mean FFD at 12 months was 12° in the triceps-sparing cohort and 26° in the triceps-detaching cohort (p<0.01). Self-reported outcomes and prosthetic component positioning on radiographs did not differ significantly. Major surgery-related complication rates up to 44% were reported, without significant differences between groups. Infection, ulnar nerve dysfunction, fractures of the proximal ulna, and triceps insufficiency were most frequently reported. The triceps-sparing approach results in significant and clinically relevant better FFD and range of motion (ROM) than the triceps-detaching approach. Patient-reported outcomes and prosthetic component positioning on radiographs are similar and reported complication rates are high but comparable between approaches. The trial has been registered in the Dutch Trial Register: NTR NL8488. Level II; Prospective Cohort Design; Treatment Study.