Fast-track extubation has emerged as a vital component of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery pathways, designed to optimize recovery and resource utilization after cardiac surgery, contrasting with traditional prolonged ventilation. This review explores the evidence supporting fast-track extubation, detailing patient selection criteria based on preoperative risk factors and functional status and outlining perioperative management strategies. It synthesizes findings from various studies, including randomized controlled trials, retrospective studies, and meta-analyses, focusing on intraoperative techniques such as low-dose opioids, neuromuscular blockade reversal, controlled cardiopulmonary bypass duration, judicious inotrope use, and minimal transfusion, alongside structured postoperative protocols emphasizing early sedative weaning and spontaneous breathing trials. Results demonstrate that fast-track extubation decreases intensive care unit stay, reduces costs and ventilator-associated complications, with a safety comparable to conventional care. Prolonged cardiopulmonary bypass time, dependency on inotropes, and intraoperative blood transfusions are identified as critical predictors of fast-track extubation failure. In conclusion, the successful implementation of fast-track extubation protocols requires a collaborative, multidisciplinary approach, proving essential for improving patient outcomes, minimizing complications such as postoperative delirium, and enhancing hospital efficiency in cardiac surgery. Further research should aim to refine patient selection and standardize protocols across healthcare systems.

Background: Advances in pediatric perioperative care have supported the safe provision of increasingly complex surgical care to patients with complicated diseases and abnormal physiology. This has led to the possible misalignment of the impact of potential surgical outcomes and goals of care. Methods / Objectives: We describe the development of a novel process that leverages the combination of longitudinal engagement of pediatric palliative care consultants and multidisciplinary care planning to ensure that perioperative care remains patient-centered and goal-directed for all children, especially children with complex baseline disease. Conclusions: Our novel process should be considered a solution to a crictial gap in pediatric perioperative care.