RICARDO BECKER FEIJÓ

Prof. Dr. RICARDO BECKER FEIJÓ

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

7Years (2020-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
30 August 2024 in Vaccines
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
RICARDO BECKER FEIJÓRICARDO BECKER FEIJÓ
RICARDO BECKER FEIJÓ
JBJordana Vaz Hendler Bertotto
Jordana Vaz Hendler Bertotto
APAmanda Calage Pinto
Amanda Calage Pinto
MLMaria Eduarda Torança Garcia Leal
Maria Eduarda Torança Garcia Leal
VSVictor Messias de Souza
Victor Messias de Souza
VSVitoria Fedrizzi Sakai Sakai
Vitoria Fedrizzi Sakai Sakai
Background: Declining vaccination coverage (VC) and vaccine hesitancy among medical students are global challenges. These challenges reflect individual and logistical barriers to a sufficient adherence toward essential vaccines for healthcare professionals, as well as presenting a need for educational strategies during undergraduate training. Methods: This is a prospective study for evaluating VC rates, sociodemographic associations, and the vaccine confidence among medical students at a federal university in Brazil. The data collection included questionnaires and individual analyses of the participants’ vaccination records. Results: A total of 237 medical students from all six years of an undergraduate program participated, of whom 124 (52.3%) had a vaccination record. Although the majority considered the vaccines to be “Completely Safe” (86.9%), the VC rates for complete vaccination schedules were relatively low, ranging from 87.9% (hepatitis B vaccine) to 3.2% (meningococcal B vaccine), including the vaccines from the National Immunization Program (NIP) and the private sector. Higher VC rates were found to occur among students in the final years of their undergraduate studies, in those from families with higher monthly incomes, and those from private secondary schools. Conclusions: Given the low VC rates among medical students, other factors in addition to vaccine confidence may be determinants, thus highlighting the importance of reviewing policies for the inclusion of priority groups in the NIP and in implementing educational interventions during undergraduate training.

10 July 2020 in The Brazilian Journal of Infectious Diseases
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
RICARDO BECKER FEIJÓRICARDO BECKER FEIJÓ
RICARDO BECKER FEIJÓ
JCJuarez Cunha
Juarez Cunha
The aim of this study was to compare the trajectory of serogroups causing Invasive Meningococcal Disease (IMD) in the Santa Catarina (SC) state with those of whole Brazil. A retrospective analysis of all IMD cases reported from January 2007 to December 2019 was carried out. During the study period, 26,058 IMD cases were registered in Brazil and 644 and in SC state alone. Overall, Brazil showed progressive reduction in cases since 2010, when the meningococcal C conjugate vaccine was introducted on National Immunization Program, while SC showed an increase in total cases since 2013, particularly from serogroups W and C. Serogroups distribution was significantly different between Brazil and SC. The emergence of serogroup W highlights the improved meningococcal surveillance through increased accuracy in identification methods in SC state. This finding is important for discussing recommendations of quadrivalent (ACWY) conjugate vaccines in different geographical areas of Brazil.

18 September 2026 in Preprints.org
Verified
Preprint
Open access
PDF file
JBJordana Vaz Hendler Bertotto
Jordana Vaz Hendler Bertotto
RICARDO BECKER FEIJÓRICARDO BECKER FEIJÓ
RICARDO BECKER FEIJÓ
APAmanda Calage Pinto
Amanda Calage Pinto
MLMaria Eduarda Torança Garcia Leal
Maria Eduarda Torança Garcia Leal
VSVictor Messias de Souza
Victor Messias de Souza
Objectives: To evaluate determinants of vaccine hesitancy among medical students at a Brazilian federal university using the 5C model as a theoretical framework. Methods: A cross-sectional observational study was conducted among medical students at the Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil, between December 2024 and March 2025. Data were collected using a self-administered questionnaire conceptually based on the 5C model (confidence, complacency, convenience, communication, and context). The questionnaire was pilot-tested among medical students before application to assess clarity and comprehensibility. Sociodemographic variables and vaccine-related perceptions were analyzed descriptively and inferentially using Pearson’s chi-square, Fisher’s exact, Student’s t, and Mann–Whitney tests. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05. Results: Out of 809 eligible students, 230 participated in the study (response rate: 28.4%). Most participants reported complete confidence in vaccines (83.5%). Complete confidence in vaccines was more frequently reported among female students than male students (89.4% vs. 75.5%; p = 0.006) and among students from private schools compared with those from public schools (87.7% vs. 78.7%; p = 0.04). Although most participants perceived moderate or high risk for vaccine-preventable diseases, 28.8% reported low risk perception. Higher perceived risk was significantly associated with higher vaccine confidence (p = 0.010). Regarding convenience, 54.0% of participants reported moderate to very high impact of logistical barriers on vaccination decisions. Healthcare professionals (32.3%) and scientific or academic sources (30.1%) were the most frequently reported information sources, although 19.9% identified social media as their primary source. Sociocultural influences on vaccination decisions were considered low or absent by most participants (66.9%). Conclusions: Medical students demonstrated high confidence in vaccines; however, determinants potentially associated with vaccine hesitancy were identified, particularly within the domains of complacency, convenience, and communication. These findings highlight the need for institutional and educational strategies to improve vaccine access, strengthen immunization education, and promote critical appraisal of health information during medical training.