Maria Mayoral

Dr. Maria Mayoral

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

19Years (2008-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 August 2013 in American Journal of Psychiatry
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
CTCarla Torrent
Carla Torrent
CBCaterina del Mar Bonnin
Caterina del Mar Bonnin
AMAnabel Martinez-Aran
Anabel Martinez-Aran
JVJesús Valle
Jesús Valle
BABenedikt Amann
Benedikt Amann
Eduard VietaEduard Vieta
Eduard Vieta

1 January 2013 in Schizophrenia Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ESElena de la Serna
Elena de la Serna
SASusana Andrés-Perpiñá
Susana Andrés-Perpiñá
OPOlga Puig
Olga Puig
IBInmaculada Baeza
Inmaculada Baeza
IBIgor Bombin
Igor Bombin
JCJosefina Castro-Fornieles
Josefina Castro-Fornieles

19 September 2009 in European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
AZArantzazu Zabala
Arantzazu Zabala
MRMarta Rapado-Castro
Marta Rapado-Castro
CACelso Arango
Celso Arango
OROlalla Robles
Olalla Robles
ESElena de la Serna
Elena de la Serna
IBIgor Bombín
Igor Bombín

25 July 2012 in Psychological Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
IBI. Bombin
I. Bombin
MMMaria Mayoral
Maria Mayoral
JCJ. Castro-Fornieles
J. Castro-Fornieles
AGAna González-Pinto
Ana González-Pinto
ESE. de la Serna
E. de la Serna
CAC. Arango
C. Arango
Background: The longitudinal neuropsychological study of first-episode early-onset psychosis (EOP) patients, whose brain maturation is still in progress at the time of illness onset, provides a unique opportunity to compare their cognitive development with that of healthy subjects, in search of specific patterns resulting from the interaction between neurodevelopmental processes and the presence of psychotic disorders.Method: Seventy-five first-episode EOP patients (schizophrenian = 35; bipolar disordern = 17; other forms of psychosisn = 23) with a mean age of 15.53 years were assessed with a neuropsychological battery that included measures of attention, working memory, memory and executive functions within 6 months following the onset of the first psychotic symptom (baseline) and 2 years later. Psychotic symptoms were assessed at both times with the Positive and Negative Symptom Scale (PANSS). Seventy-nine healthy subjects matched for age and education served as controls.Results: EOP patients showed significant cognitive impairment at both baseline and the 2-year follow-up, with no significant differences between diagnostic groups at either time. Both healthy controls and EOP patients improved in all cognitive measures, except for patient working memory. Improvement in patient attention lost significance after controlling for psychotic symptom reduction. No significant time/diagnosis interaction was found among patients (p > 0.405).Conclusions: Cognitive impairment in EOP is already present at the first episode, and cognitive development seems to be arrested early in EOP patients compared to their healthy peers, at least for some cognitive functions. These and previous similar results support the neurodevelopmental hypothesis of psychosis.

1 February 2010 in Journal of Nervous & Mental Disease
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ESElena de la Serna
Elena de la Serna
MMMaria Mayoral
Maria Mayoral
IBInmaculada Baeza
Inmaculada Baeza
CACelso Arango
Celso Arango
PAPatricia Andrés
Patricia Andrés
JCJosefina Castro-Fornieles
Josefina Castro-Fornieles
To investigate the relationship between cognition and prior cannabis use in children and adolescents presenting a first episode of psychosis. A total of 107 patients with first episode of psychosis and 96 healthy controls, aged 9 to 17 years, were interviewed about their previous substance use and to assess their cognitive functions. Patients were assessed while not using cannabis by means of a comprehensive neuropsychological battery. They were divided into 2 groups depending on the history of prior cannabis use: cannabis users (CU) and cannabis nonusers (CNU). Significant differences were found in all areas evaluated between the 3 groups. Both CU and CNU patients obtained lower scores than controls on verbal learning and memory and working memory. Patients with prior cannabis use performed better on some tests of attention (Continuous performance test (CPT) number of correct responses, p = 0.002; CPT average reaction time, p < 0.001) and executive functions (Trail Making Test, part B (TMT-B) number of mistakes, p < 0.001; Wisconsin Card Sorting Test (WCST) number of categories completed, p < 0.001) than CNU patients. CU patients performed better than CNU subjects on some cognitive measures. This may indicate lower individual vulnerability for psychosis in CU patients in whom cannabis use can be a precipitating factor of psychotic episodes.

1 February 2015 in European Neuropsychopharmacology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
BSBrisa Solé
Brisa Solé
CBC. Mar Bonnin
C. Mar Bonnin
MMMaria Mayoral
Maria Mayoral
BABenedikt Amann
Benedikt Amann
ITImma Torres
Imma Torres
CTCarla Torrent
Carla Torrent