Background: Heart failure, a major public health concern, significantly contributes to hospital admissions. This study evaluates the impact of malnutrition on both patient and hospital outcomes in heart failure admissions, with a specific focus on variations in outcomes based on the severity of malnutrition. Methods: Utilizing the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database, this retrospective cohort study included adult patients admitted with a principal diagnosis of heart failure. Malnutrition was identified using the well-validated ICD 10 codes. We compared outcomes between patients with and without malnutrition, focusing on mortality, length of stay (LOS), hospital charges, cardiac arrest, and cardiogenic shock. Results: Out of 1,110,085 heart failure patients, 36,522 (3.29%) were malnourished. Malnourished patients exhibited significantly higher adjusted in-hospital mortality rates (aOR 3.32; 95% CI 3.03–3.64), longer LOS (mean increase of 4.67 days; p < 0.001), and higher hospital charges (mean increase of USD 77,416.9; p < 0.01). Increased rates of cardiac arrest (aOR 2.39; 95% CI 1.99–2.86; p < 0.001) and cardiogenic shock (aOR 3.74; 95% CI 3.40–4.12; p < 0.001) were also noted in malnourished patients. Severely malnourished patients faced worse outcomes compared to those with mild to moderate malnutrition. Conclusions: Heart failure patients with malnutrition experience higher mortality rates, longer hospital stays, increased hospitalization charges, and greater complication rates, including cardiac arrest and cardiogenic shock, compared to non-malnourished patients. Outcomes deteriorate with the increasing severity of malnutrition. Timely and individualized nutritional interventions may significantly improve outcomes for heart failure admissions.

Background/Objectives: Heart failure is the leading cause of hospital admission and mortality. Racial disparities have been demonstrated in various cardiovascular disorders; however, the data for in-hospital outcomes, complications, and procedural rates are limited. Methods: Utilizing the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database, this retrospective cohort study included adult patients admitted with a principal diagnosis of heart failure. Coding for race and ethnicity in the NIS combines self-reported race and ethnicity provided by the data source into 1 data element (“RACE”). We compared the outcomes between various racial groups, focusing on mortality, the length of stay (LOS), hospital charges, and complications. Differences in the utilization of advanced therapies, including implantable cardiac defibrillators, cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT), ventricular assist devices (VADs), and heart transplant, were also analyzed. Results: Out of 1,107,860 patients hospitalized with heart failure, 715,345 (64.57%) patients were White, 244,394 (22.06%) patients were Black, and 97,063 (8.31%) patients were Hispanic. Compared to White people, the odds of in-hospital mortality were lower among Black (aOR 0.74; 95% CI 0.68–0.81; p < 0.001) and Hispanic (aOR 0.78; 95% CI 0.69–0.88; p < 0.001) people. Complication rates including cardiogenic shock were found to be significantly lower in Black people (aOR 0.86; 95% CI 0.77–0.96; p < 0.001) and in Hispanic (aOR 0.72; 95% CI 0.63–0.81; p < 0.001) people. The rates of acute respiratory failure were also lower in Black (aOR 0.72; 95% CI 0.69–0.74; p < 0.001) and Hispanic (aOR 0.77; 95% CI 0.73–0.81; p < 0.001) people as opposed to White people. However, Black people were found to have higher rates of acute kidney injury (aOR 1.11; 95% CI 1.07–1.14; p < 0.001) and cardiac arrest (aOR 1.17; 95% CI 1.03–1.34; p = 0.02) compared to White people. Black people were less likely to receive advanced interventions, including cardiac resynchronization therapy (aOR 0.71; 95% CI 0.60–0.83; p < 0001), a ventricular assist device (aOR 0.45; 95% CI 0.34–0.59; p < 0.001), and heart transplants (aOR 0.57; 95% CI 0.42–0.77; p < 0.001), than White people. Hispanic people were found to have lower rates of ventricular assist device (aOR 0.49; 95% CI 0.33–0.72; p < 0.001) use than White people. Conclusions: These findings highlight significant racial disparities in mortality, secondary outcomes, and advanced therapy utilization in heart failure admissions. Further research is needed to identify the root factors for these disparities in order to guide targeted interventions to reduce this racial gap.

Background: Frailty, with a high prevalence of 40–80% in heart failure, may have a significant bearing on outcomes in patients. This study utilizes the Hospital Frailty Risk Score (HFRS), a validated tool derived from the administrative International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision, Clinical Modifications (ICD-10-CM) codes, in investigating the mortality, morbidity, and healthcare resource utilization among heart failure hospitalizations using the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS). Methods: A retrospective analysis of the 2021 NIS database was assessed to identify adult patients hospitalized with heart failure. These patients were stratified by the HFRS into three groups: low frailty (LF: 15). The outcomes analyzed included inpatient mortality, length of stay (LOS), hospitalization charges, and complications including cardiogenic shock, cardiac arrest, acute kidney injury, and acute respiratory failure. These outcomes were adjusted for age, race, gender, the Charlson comorbidity score, hospital location, region, and teaching status. Multivariate logistic and linear regression analyses were used to assess the association between frailty and clinical outcomes. STATA/MP 18.0 was used for statistical analysis. Results: Among 1,198,988 heart failure admissions, 47.5% patients were in the LF group, whereas the IF and HF groups had 51.1% and 1.4% patients, respectively. Compared to the LF group, the IF group showed a 4-fold higher (adjusted OR = 4.60, p < 0.01), and the HF group had an 11-fold higher (adjusted OR 10.90, p < 0.01) mortality. Frail patients were more likely to have a longer length of stay (4.24 days, 7.18 days, and 12.1 days in the LF, IF, and HF groups) and higher hospitalization charges (USD 49,081, USD 84,472, and USD 129,516 in the LF, IF, and HF groups). Complications were also noticed to be significantly (p < 0.01) higher with increasing frailty from the LF to HF groups. These included cardiogenic shock (1.65% vs. 4.78% vs. 6.82%), cardiac arrest (0.37% vs. 1.61% vs. 3.16%), acute kidney injury (19.2% vs. 54.9% vs. 74.6%), and acute respiratory failure (29.6% vs. 51.2% vs. 60.3%). Conclusions: This study demonstrates the application of HFRS in a national dataset as a predictor of outcome and resource utilization measures in heart failure admissions. Stratifying patients based on HFRS can help in holistic assessment, aid prognostication, and guide targeted interventions in heart failure.

Background/Objectives: Heart failure presents a significant public health challenge, affecting millions in the US, with projections of increasing prevalence and economic burdens. Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is highly prevalent among HF patients. This study analyzes the impact of OSA on the outcomes in patients admitted with acute decompensated heart failure. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using the National Inpatient Sample database (NIS) 2020, focusing on patients admitted with acute heart failure. Patient outcomes were compared between those with and without a secondary diagnosis of OSA, identified via validated ICD-10 codes. Subgroup analysis was conducted between heart failure patients with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). Results: Among 65,649 patients with acute heart failure, 4595 (7%) patients were found to have OSA. The patients with OSA were more likely to be male, older in age and had a higher burden of comorbidities. No significant differences were observed in mortality between heart failure patients with and without OSA. In HFrEF patients, OSA was associated with longer hospital stays (6.45 days vs. 5.79 days, p < 0.001), higher rates of acute kidney injury (AKI) (adjusted odds ratio 1.28, 95% CI: 1.07–1.54, p = 0.007), and atrial fibrillation (adjusted odds ratio 1.35, 95% CI: 1.13–1.61, p = 0.001). In HFpEF patients, an association between OSA and AF was observed (adjusted odds ratio 1.20, 95% CI: 1.01–1.42, p = 0.03). Conclusions: OSA is associated with poor in-hospital outcomes in patients admitted with acute heart failure. HFrEF subgroup is especially vulnerable, with OSA leading to a significant increase in healthcare utilization and complication rates in these patients. This nationwide study underscores the importance of timely identification and treatment of OSA in heart failure to alleviate healthcare burdens and improve patient outcomes.