CO₂-enhanced oil recovery (CO₂-EOR) is a crucial method for CO₂ utilization and sequestration, representing an important zero-carbon or even negative-carbon emission reduction technology. However, the low viscosity of CO₂ and reservoir heterogeneity often result in early gas breakthrough, significantly reducing CO₂ utilization and sequestration efficiency. A water-alternating-gas (WAG) injection is a technique for mitigating gas breakthrough and viscous fingering in CO₂-EOR. However, it encounters challenges related to insufficient mobility control in highly heterogeneous and fractured reservoirs, resulting in gas channeling and low sweep efficiency. Despite the extensive application and research of a WAG injection in oil and gas reservoirs, the most recent comprehensive review dates back to 2018, which focuses on the mechanisms of EOR using conventional WAG. Herein, we give an updated and comprehensive review to incorporate the latest advancements in CO₂-WAG flooding techniques for enhanced sweep efficiency, which includes the theory, applications, fluid displacement mechanisms, and control strategies of a CO₂-WAG injection. It addresses common challenges, operational issues, and remedial measures in WAG projects by covering studies from experiments, simulations, and pore-scale modeling. This review aims to provide guidance and serve as a reference for the application and research advancement of CO₂-EOR techniques in heterogeneous and fractured reservoirs.

Porosity is the most common form of reservoirs, and its size, shape, and connectivity directly affect the capacity of oil and gas storage and production. To study the micro–nano-pore structure characteristics of shale oil reservoirs and quantitatively characterize its heterogeneity, this work uses high-precision high-pressure mercury intrusion (HPMI) experimental techniques to study the micro–nano-pore structure characteristics of shale oil, and based on the experimental data, fractal theory is used to quantitatively characterize its heterogeneity. The results of the study show that the micro–nano-pores in the shale oil reservoir are concentrated and continuous, and the pore radius is mainly distributed among the range of 30–500 nm, nanoscale pores are an important part of the pores of the shale oil reservoir. The fractal dimension of the shale oil reservoir is larger than the fractal dimension of typical tight oil reservoirs, indicating that the heterogeneity of shale oil reservoir is stronger. The research results have some theoretical and practical significance for the production of inter-salt shale oil reservoirs.

Given the difficulty in developing waterflooding in tight oil reservoirs, using waterflooding huff-n-puff is an effective method to improve oil recovery. Online nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) can detect the change in internal oil and water during the core displacement process, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in real time. To improve the tight oil reservoir development effectiveness, cores with different permeability were selected for a waterflooding huff-n-puff experiment. Combined with online NMR equipment, the fluid saturation, recovery rate, and residual oil distribution were studied. The experiments showed that, for tight oil cores, more than 80% of the pores were sub-micro- and micro-nanopores. More than 77.8% of crude oil existed in the sub-micro- and micropores, and movable fluids mainly existed in the micropores with a radius larger than 1 μm. The NMR data and the MRI images both demonstrated that the recovery ratio of waterflooding after waterflooding huff-n-puff was higher than that of conventional waterflooding, and, therefore, residual oil was lower. Choosing two cycles’ of waterflooding, huff-n-puff was more suitable for tight oil reservoir development. The production of crude oil increased by 22.2% in the field pilot test, which preliminarily proved that waterflooding huff-n-puff was suitable for tight oil reservoirs.

The mechanism by which oil recovery can be enhanced by different injection methods of CO₂ miscible flooding to alleviate the influence of heterogeneous reservoirs was studied to optimize the injection methods, further improving oil recovery. According to the reservoir heterogeneity characteristics of the TI oil formation group in Lunnan Oilfield, a 1 m double-layer long core was designed and prepared for four CO₂ miscible displacement experiments with different injection methods. By analyzing the variation in the injection-production parameters, the displacement effects of different injection methods were compared, and the mechanism of enhanced oil recovery (EOR) was summarized. The results indicate the following. ① The displacement efficiency of the different injection methods lies in the following order. Alternate CO₂-water injection, continuous CO₂ flooding, cyclic CO₂ flooding, and alternate CO₂-hydrocarbon gas injection. ② The recovery of crude oil via CO₂ miscible flooding in heterogeneous reservoirs relies on both convective diffusion and miscible mass transfer. Convective diffusion depends mainly on control of the displacement pressure differential and the plugging of preferential seepage channels in high-permeability areas, while miscible mass transfer depends mainly on the swept range of the convective diffusion and the degree of miscibility between CO₂ and crude oil. ③ To improve the recovery efficiency of CO₂ miscible flooding in heterogeneous reservoirs, it is necessary to choose an injection method that optimizes these two aspects.

In order to evaluate the displacement effect of four kinds of injection media in tight oil sandstone, water, active water, CO₂, N₂ flooding experiments were carried out in laboratory. Online Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR) spectrometers combine the advantages of NMR technology and core displacement experiments. In the displacement experiment, NMR data of different injection volumes were obtained and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was carried out. The results showed that micro and sub-micropores provided 62–97% of the produced crude oil. The enhanced oil recovery ratio of active water flooding was higher than that of conventional water flooding up to 10%. The recovery ratio of gas flooding in micro and sub-micropores was 60–70% higher than that of water flooding. The recovery ratio of CO₂ flooding was 10% higher than that of N₂ flooding. The remaining oil was mainly distributed in pores larger than 0.1 μm. Under the same permeability level, the remaining oil saturation of cores after gas flooding was 10–25% lower than water flooding. From MRI images, the displacement effects from good to bad were as follows: CO₂ flooding, N₂ flooding, active water flooding, and conventional water flooding.