Background: Frequent premature ventricular complexes (PVCs) are associated with adverse outcomes in patients with structural heart disease (SHD), including increased risk of mortality and impaired left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). While radiofrequency ablation (RFA) of idiopathic PVCs is well established, its role in patients with SHD remains less clear. Objective: To review the evidence on the efficacy of RFA for PVC suppression in patients with SHD, specifically evaluating its impact on LVEF and clinical outcomes. Methods: A review of the literature was conducted using PubMed and the Cochrane Library, focusing on studies published after 2010 that included adult patients with SHD and a PVC burden >4% on 24 h Holter monitoring. Studies including patients with presumed PVC-induced cardiomyopathy without underlying SHD were excluded. Key outcomes were LVEF recovery, functional status, and procedural success rates. Results: In ischemic cardiomyopathy, RFA reduced PVC burden significantly and resulted in modest but significant LVEF improvement. In non-ischemic cardiomyopathy, successful ablation improved LVEF by 8–12% on average and enhanced NYHA class. Across mixed cohorts, patients with sustained PVC suppression showed significant improvements in LVEF, functional status, which, in many cases, removed the indication for implantable cardioverter-defibrillators. Notably, procedural success rates ranged from 60 to 94%, and the high baseline PVC burden (>13–20%) consistently predicted LVEF recovery regardless of SHD etiology. Conclusions: RFA of frequent PVCs in patients with SHD leads to meaningful improvements in systolic function and symptoms, particularly in those with high PVC burden. These benefits are seen across ischemic and non-ischemic substrates, although procedural complexity and recurrence rates may be higher. PVC burden, rather than SHD presence alone, should guide patient selection for ablation.

Background: The advent of subcutaneous implantable cardioverter defibrillators (S-ICDs) marked a significant milestone in the course of cardiac rhythm devices, particularly for patients who are deemed at high risk for ventricular arrhythmias and sudden cardiac death. This extracardiac approach makes the S-ICD an especially valuable option for young patients, those with difficult venous access, or those at high risk of infection. Although the S-ICD does not provide pacing for bradycardia or heart failure, it has shown efficacy in treating ventricular arrhythmias while minimizing complications associated with transvenous systems. Methods: The purpose of this multicenter retrospective analysis was to assess the real-world efficacy and safety of the S-ICD in a heterogeneous population. Results: The GASP registry consisted of 114 patients, 68% male, aged 41 ± 15 years, with a mean LVEF of 50%. In the follow-up of 35 months, inappropriate shocks occurred in 7% while appropriate shocks occurred in 6.2%. The most common reasons for inappropriate shocks were myopotentials and atrial tachyarrhythmias. Thirty-day complication-free rates were 97.3%, with the majority of patients requiring device extraction due to infection. Over the longer term, four patients required re-intervention due to local discomfort, while one device was extracted for infection. In a multivariate analysis, complications were not significantly higher in the sicker population, such as those with diabetes, kidney disease requiring dialysis, or heart failure. Conclusions: These findings support the growing role of the S-ICD as an alternative to the TV-ICD, especially in patients without pacing indications.

Atrial fibrillation has progressively become a more common reason for emergency de-partment visits, representing 0.5% of presenting reasons. Registry data have indicated that about 60% of atrial fibrillation patients who present to the emergency department are admitted, emphasizing the need for more-efficient management of atrial fibrillation in the acute phase. Management of atrial fibrillation in the setting of emergency department varies between countries and health care systems. The most plausible reason to justify a conservative rather than aggressive strategy in the management of atrial fibrillation is the absence of specific guidelines from diverse societies. Several trials of atrial fibrillation treatment strategies, including cardioversion, have demonstrated that atrial fibrillation in emergency department can be treated safely and effectively, avoiding admission. In the present study, we review the epidemiology and characteristics of atrial fibrillation pa-tients presenting to the emergency department will be reviewed, as well as the impact of diverse management strategies on atrial fibrillation-related hospital admissions. Lastly, the design and initial data of the HEROMEDICUS protocol, which constitutes an elec-trophysiology-based aggressive rhythm control strategy in patients with atrial fibrillation in the emergency department setting will be presented.

Background/Objectives: Syncope remains a common problem in the elderly, adversely affecting quality of life, morbidity and mortality. Diagnosis is challenging due to the atypical presentation, multifactorial aetiology, overlap with non-syncoptic falls and increased prevalence of cardiac disease. This study aims to investigate the impact of cardiac syncope in this high-risk population. Methods: A retrospective single-centre observational cohort study, including 171 patients ≥65 years old with syncope of unknown origin or other falls, was conducted. Different diagnostic tests and strategies were utilised during the investigational process, based on clinical judgement and the latest guidelines. Patients were classified either in the ‘high risk’ (‘cardiac’) or ‘low-risk’ (‘autonomic’) pathway. Results: Mean age was 76.4 ± 6.6 years (range: 65–92 years old) and the mean follow-up period was 40.5 months. Our study population was characterised by a high incidence of comorbidities and underlying heart disease, and polypharmacy. One third of the patients did not report prodromals, 81.9% had no recognisable trigger and 43.3% had various 12-lead ECG abnormalities. Overall, 67.8% of the patients were stratified in the ‘cardiac pathway’. Eventually, a final diagnosis was established in 126 patients (73.7%). The cause was cardiac syncope in 56.4%, reflex syncope in 26.2%, orthostatic hypotension in 7.9% and non-syncopal falls in 9.5%. An ILR was implanted in 90.1% with a diagnostic yield of 43%. ECG-based diagnosis occurred in 53.2% whereas time to diagnosis was 4.8 ± 3.3 months. Conclusions: Cardiac disease, mostly arrythmias, represent a common and possibly underestimated cause of unexplained syncope in the elderly. A structured approach including a targeted use of ILRs improves investigational process.

Background/Objectives: Syncope remains a common problem in the elderly, adversely affecting quality of life, morbidity and mortality. Diagnosis is challenging due to the atypical presentation, multifactorial aetiology, overlap with non-syncoptic falls and increased prevalence of cardiac disease. This study aims to investigate the impact of cardiac syncope in this high-risk population. Methods: A retrospective single-center observational cohort study, including 171 patients ≥ 65 years-old with syncope of unknown origin or other falls. Different diagnostic tests and strategies were utilised during the investigational process investigation, based on clinical judgement and the latest guidelines. Patients were classified either in the ‘high risk’ (‘cardiac’) or ‘low-risk’ (‘autonomic’) pathway. Results: Mean age was 76.4±6.6 years (range: 65-92 years-old) and the mean follow-up period was 40.5 months. Our study population was characterised by a high incidence of comorbidities and underlying heart disease, and polypharmacy. One third of the patients did not report prodromals, 81.9% had no recognizable trigger and 43.3% had various 12-lead ECG abnormalities. Overall, 67.8% of the patients were stratified in the ‘cardiac pathway’. Eventually, a final diagnosis was established in 126 patients (73.7%). The cause was cardiac syncope in 56.4%, reflex syncope in 26.2%, orthostatic hypotension in 7.9% and non-syncopal falls in 9.5%. An ILR was implanted in 90.1% with a diagnostic yield of 43%. ECG-based diagnosis occurred in 53.2% whereas time to diagnosis was 4.8±3.3 months. Conclusions: Cardiac disease, mostly arrythmias, represent a common and possibly underestimated cause of unexplained syncope in the elderly. A structured approach including a targeted use of ILRs improves investigational process.

Purpose: Syncope remains a common medical problem. Recently, the role of dedicated syncope units and implantable loop recorders has emerged in the investigation of unexplained syncope. This study aims to investigate the possibilities for a more rational and targeted use of various diagnostic tools. Methods: In this retrospective single-center study, 196 patients with unexplained syncope were included between March 2019 and February 2023. Various diagnostic tools were utilized during the investigation, according to clinical judgement. Patients were retrospectively allocated into Group A (including those who, among other tests, underwent loop recorder insertion) and Group B (including patients investigated without loop recorder implantation). Data were compared with Group C, including patients assessed prior to syncope unit establishment. Results: There was no difference between Group A (n = 133) and Group B (n = 63) in the diagnostic yield (74% vs. 76%, p = 0.22). There were significant differences between Groups A and B regarding age (67.3 ± 16.9 years vs. 48.3 ± 19.1 years, p < 0.001) and cause of syncope (cardiogenic in 69% of Group A, reflex syncope in 77% of Group B, p < 0.001). Electrocardiography-based diagnosis occurred in 55% and 19% of Groups A and B, respectively (p < 0.001). The time to diagnosis was 4.2 ± 2.7 months in Group A and 7.5 ± 5.6 months in Group B (p < 0.001). In Group C, the diagnostic yield was 57.9% and the electrocardiography-based diagnostic yield was 18.3%. Conclusions: A selective use of loop recorders according to clinical and electrocardiographic characteristics increases the effectiveness of the structured syncope unit approach and further preserves financial resources.