Background/Objectives: Studies have shown that consistent reductions of 2 mm Hg in systolic blood pressure (SBP) for the general normotensive population can result in significant decreases in mortality from heart disease and stroke. The purpose of this meta-analysis was to determine the optimal dose and duration of treatment for magnesium and potassium supplementation, having previously discovered that both reduce SBP by −2.79 and −2.10 mm Hg, respectively. Methods: Placebo-controlled, randomized clinical trials examining the effects of magnesium and potassium supplementation on SBP were identified. Pairwise meta-analyses with subgroups for dosage and treatment duration were run. Results: Magnesium at dosages of ≤360 mg/day and durations greater than 3 months reduced SBP by −3.03 and −4.31 mm Hg, respectively. Potassium at dosages of ≤60 mmol/day and durations greater than 1 month reduced SBP by −2.34 and −2.80 mm Hg, respectively. Conclusions: Both supplements demonstrated greater reductions in SBP for the general population at lower dosages and longer treatment durations. Future studies are needed to validate these findings and provide tailored recommendations. These studies could investigate varying dosages over long-term follow-up to provide robust data on optimal dosages and treatment durations, as our findings were limited due to reliance on previously published trials.

Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) affects 32 million people worldwide and is responsible for tens of billions of dollars in healthcare expenditure annually, with costs primarily driven by hospitalizations. HFpEF is notoriously difficult to treat, but emerging studies suggest that glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) may be effective therapies. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of six randomized controlled trials with 5564 total participants investigating GLP-1 RAs in patients with HFpEF. Overall, no significant effect was noted for GLP-1 RAs on our primary outcomes of cardiovascular mortality and worsening heart failure (HF) events, although they were associated with improvement in quality of life measures. Furthermore, safety data favored the GLP-1 RA group, although tolerability did not differ compared with placebo. While the pooled analysis of all GLP-1 RAs showed neutral effects versus hard endpoints, sensitivity analyses excluding older-generation agents (exenatide) revealed a significant 41% reduction in HF events, suggesting that newer, more potent agents (semaglutide, tirzepatide) may offer disease-modifying benefits in HFpEF. Although future studies are needed, GLP-1 RAs appear to be promising for the treatment of HFpEF.

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) messenger RNA (mRNA) vaccines have been associated with numerous side effects since their widespread release to the public. Cardiovascular complications include myocarditis and pericarditis, Takotsubo cardiomyopathy, postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome (POTS), arrhythmias, sudden cardiac death, and cardiac tamponade. Pulmonary complications are pulmonary embolism (PE), interstitial lung disease (ILD), idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), pneumonia, eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis, pneumonitis, and pulmonary hypertension. Despite these complications, the risk–benefit analysis still strongly favors vaccination, as these events occur more frequently with natural infection and confer a significantly worse prognosis. This study outlines the evidence surrounding each attributed effect, the clinical course including diagnosis and management, and the proposed pathophysiology. To our knowledge, this is the most comprehensive review of the cardiopulmonary effects of COVID-19 vaccination to date.

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) messenger RNA (mRNA) vaccines have been associated with numerous side effects since widespread release to the public. Cardiovascular complications include myocarditis and pericarditis, Takotsubo cardiomyopathy, postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome (POTS), arrhythmias, sudden cardiac death, and cardiac tamponade. Pulmonary complications are pulmonary embolism (PE), interstitial lung disease (ILD), idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), pneumonia, eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis, pneumonitis, and pulmonary hypertension. Despite these complications, the risk-benefit analysis still strongly favors vaccination, as these events occur more frequently with natural infection and confer a significantly worse prognosis. This study outlines the evidence surrounding each attributed effect, the clinical course including diagnosis and management, and the proposed pathophysiology. To our knowledge, this is the most comprehensive review of the cardiopulmonary effects of COVID-19 vaccination to date.

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common arrhythmia worldwide and is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Catheter ablation of AF has been shown to result in a significant reduction in AF burden and recurrence. Pulsed field ablation (PFA) is a new modality of catheter ablation that is noninferior to its thermal ablation counterparts, coupled with a more favorable safety profile. This study seeks to compare clinical outcomes between two PFA systems: PulseSelect™ (Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN, USA) (circular catheter) and FARAPULSE™ (Boston Scientific, Marlborough, MA, USA) (pentaspline catheter). Secondary aims are to evaluate the impacts of post-ablation mapping with a high-density mapping catheter (PAHDMC) and both procedure and fluoroscopy times on recurrence. Overall, across 895 patients with a median follow-up of 12.5 months, there was a recurrence rate of 39%. PFA system, PAHDMC, and procedure time all had no effect on recurrence. To our knowledge, this is the first study to compare recurrence rates between different PFA systems. Fluoroscopy time, however, was a significant predictor of recurrence. In the pentaspline catheter group, the odds of recurrence were 60% greater for every 15 min increase in fluoroscopy time. Future studies are needed to continue comparing outcomes amongst PFA systems and assess whether PAHDMC improves outcomes in PFAs.

HIV-associated cardiomyopathy is a significant cause of morbidity and mortality among people living with HIV, contributing to heart failure, arrhythmia, and sudden cardiac death. Despite its clinical importance, its individual-patient clinical spectrum has not been systematically synthesized. We conducted a systematic review of published English-language case reports and small case series describing cardiomyopathy in HIV-infected individuals. Etiologies were classified using a framework distinguishing cardiomyopathy arising from uncontrolled HIV from that occurring despite virologic control. Stratified analyses examined temporal trends and geographic differences. We identified 99 patients (75 male, 20 female, 4 unspecified) from 27 countries (80% high-income). Median age was 35 years (IQR 28–45). Among 52 patients with CD4 data, median was 154 cells/µL (IQR 84–391); 52% had CD4 < 200. Systolic dysfunction was present in 94% with echocardiographic data. Uncontrolled HIV phenotypes predominated (64%), but controlled phenotypes (21%)—including drug-induced cardiomyopathy (n = 19, predominantly zidovudine-associated) and autoimmune or inflammatory mechanisms (n = 13)—were substantial. Mortality declined across eras: 65% pre-ART, 32% early ART, 21% modern ART. Recovery occurred in 58%. HIV-associated cardiomyopathy is heterogeneous with improving outcomes across treatment eras. Systematic etiologic evaluation is warranted in all affected patients. The near absence of data from sub-Saharan Africa represents a critical gap.