Malnutrition may result in abnormal biochemical and hematological indices. This planned prespecified analysis investigated the effects of a specialized oral nutritional supplement (ONS) on biochemical and hematological indices in community-dwelling older adults at risk of malnutrition. In the Strengthening Health in ELDerly through nutrition (SHIELD) study, 811 older adults aged 65 years and above took part in this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multi-center study. Participants were randomly allocated to either a complete and balanced specialized ONS (each serving provides 262 kcal, 10.5 g protein, 7.75 µg vitamin D₃, and 0.74 g calcium β-hydroxy-β-methylbutyrate) and dietary counselling (intervention group) or a placebo and dietary counselling (placebo group). Both groups consumed study products twice a day for 180 days. Data were collected at baseline, day 90, and day 180. Blood analysis results at follow-up visits were analyzed using repeated measures analysis of covariance with adjustments for confounders. Overall, when compared with the placebo group, the intervention group showed significantly greater urea (6.0 mmol/L vs. 5.4 mmol/L, p < 0.001), urea to creatinine ratio (4.39 vs. 4.26, p < 0.001), prealbumin (24.9 mg/dL vs. 24.0 mg/dL, p < 0.001), vitamin B₁₂ (480.0 pmol/L vs. 420.1 pmol/L, p < 0.001), and globulin levels (26.8 g/L vs. 26.5 g/L, p = 0.032). The intervention group also had a significantly higher absolute reticulocyte count (62.0 × 10³/µL vs. 58.2 × 10³/µL, overall p < 0.001) and mean platelet volume (10.0 fL vs. 9.9 fL, overall p = 0.003). Furthermore, significant improvements were seen in total protein at day 90 (71.7 g/L vs. 71.1 g/L, p = 0.017) and in absolute monocyte count at day 90 (0.50 × 10³/µL vs. 0.47 × 10³/µL, p = 0.009) in the intervention group. In conclusion, daily consumption of a specialized ONS for six months led to significant improvements in biochemical and hematological indices in community-dwelling older adults at risk of malnutrition.

Postprandial hyperglycemia was shown to be an independent risk factor for microvascular and macrovascular complications in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2D). We aimed to investigate the glucose, insulin, and subjective appetite at 0, 15, 30, 45, 60, 90, 120, 150, and 180 min of three treatments: diabetes-specific formula (DSF), noodle soup, and glutinous rice. This was a randomized, crossover study with a one-week interval between treatments. Sixty-four T2D adults with oral glucose-lowering medication and HbA1c between 7% and <10% were randomized. The glucose positive area under the curve from 0 to 180 min (pAUC) was significantly lower with DSF than with glutinous rice (LSM ± SE: DSF 354 ± 32 vs. glutinous rice 451 ± 32 mmol.min/L, p = 0.033). The insulin pAUC was significantly lower with DSF (median [IQR]: 2733 [1542, 4204]) compared to glutinous rice (3359 [2193, 4744] µIU.min/mL), p = 0.042). The insulinogenic index at 30 min was significantly higher in DSF (median [IQR], 8.1 [4.2, 19.7]) compared to glutinous rice (5.4 [2.7, 11.7], p < 0.001). No significant differences were found in subjective appetite between the three treatments (all, p ≥ 0.827). There were also no significant differences in hunger, fullness, desire to eat, and prospective consumption ratings between DSF and the other two breakfasts (all p ≥ 0.181). Noodle soup led to the shortest time for hunger to return to baseline (165 min), 21 min earlier than DSF (186 min) and 32 min earlier than glutinous rice (197 min). DSF significantly reduced postprandial glucose and insulin responses compared with glutinous rice and had a higher satiating value than noodle soup in T2D adults. Replacing common Asian breakfasts with DSF may improve glycemia and hunger control.