Objective: To evaluate the risk of progression to type 2 diabetes (T2D) following reactive hypoglycemia in 100 g oral glucose tolerance test (oGTT). Methods: A retrospective analysis of parturients with up to 5-year follow-up postpartum. Data were extracted from the computerized laboratory system of Meuhedet, an Israeli HMO and cross-linked with the Israeli National Registry of Diabetes. Included were parturients with no prior diabetesand available oGTT values during pregnancy. Reactive hypoglycemia was defined as glucose levels lower than 60 mg/dL in at least one of 3 post-glucose load values in oGTT. The cohort was divided into 3 groups: normal glucose status, reactive hypoglycemia, and GDM. Maternal characteristics, laboratory data, and progression to T2D over 5 years were compared. Univariate and survival analyses assessed the adjusted hazard ratio for T2D, stratified by obesity Results: Among 14,122 parturients, 16.8% had reactive hypoglycemia, 71% had normal glucose status, and 12.2% had GDM. Adjusted for age, obesity, and hypertension, Parturients with reactive hypoglycemia had similar T2D risk compared to normal glucose status and a lower risk compared to GDM patients, regardless of obesity status. Conclusions: Reactive hypoglycemia during oGTT does not increase the risk of progressing to T2D.

Accurate sonographic estimation of fetal weight is essential for every pregnancy, especially in twin gestation. We conducted a retrospective analysis of the sonographically estimated fetal weight (sEFW) of all twin gestations performed within 14 days of delivery in a single center that aimed to evaluate the accuracy of sEFW in predicting neonatal weight and small for gestational age (SGA) by comparing the first fetus to the second. A total of 190 twin gestations were evaluated for the study. There was no statistically significant difference in the sEFW between the first and the second twins, but the second twin had a statistically significant lower birth weight (2434 vs. 2351 g, p = 0.028). No difference was found in median absolute systematic error (p = 0.450), random error, or sEFW evaluations that were within 10% of the birth weight between the fetuses (65.3% vs. 67.9%, p = 0.587). Reliability analysis demonstrated an excellent correlation between the sEFW and the birth weight for both twins; however, the Euclidean distance was slightly higher for the first twin (12.21%). For SGA prediction, overall, there was a low sensitivity and a high specificity for all fetuses, with almost no difference between the first and second twins. We found that sEFW overestimated the birth weight for the second twin, with almost no other difference in accuracy measures or SGA prediction.