Yuelun Zhang

Dr. Yuelun Zhang

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

15Years (2012-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 March 2016 in American Journal of Therapeutics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SWShanshan Wu
Shanshan Wu
YZYuelun Zhang
Yuelun Zhang
FSFeng Sun
Feng Sun
MCMingting Chen
Mingting Chen
LZLin Zhou
Lin Zhou
SZSiyan Zhan
Siyan Zhan
Multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB) is a growing public health problem. Due to long duration of therapy and concurrent use of multiple second-line drugs, adverse drug events (ADEs) are regarded as the most important clinical consideration in patients undergoing anti-MDR-TB treatment. To evaluate the frequency and type of treatment-related ADEs owing to MDR-TB therapy. The Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, and EMBASE were searched from inception through October 1, 2012, with additional manual search of International Journal of Tuberculosis and Lung Disease. Studies with available ADEs were selected if MDR-TB patients were treated with regimen including second-line drugs. Pooled estimations of incidence for each specific type of ADEs were calculated with 95% confidence intervals using random-effects model. Of the 5346 patients included, 2602 (57.3%) experienced at least 1 kind of ADE. The 3 most common side effects were gastrointestinal disorders (32.1%), ototoxicity (14.6%), and psychiatric disorders (13.2%). Subgroup analyses based on each characteristic (study population, previous tuberculosis treated, human immunodeficiency virus prevalence, and length of treatment) did not show any significant difference between groups. Additionally, among 1519 patients who developed ADEs with available data of impact on MDR-TB therapy, 70.4% required change of MDR-TB treatment. Adverse events were common among MDR-TB cases, occurring in more than half of the cases, with over two-thirds requiring change of anti-MDR-TB treatment. MDR-TB patients should be monitored closely and managed aggressively for side effects during therapy, especially for ototoxicity and psychiatric disorders.

20 November 2024 in Journal of Clinical Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JLJunyang Lu
Junyang Lu
JXJiadi Xing
Jiadi Xing
LZLu Zang
Lu Zang
CZChenghai Zhang
Chenghai Zhang
LXLai Xu
Lai Xu
RGRELARC study group
RELARC study group
PURPOSE: Complete mesocolic excision (CME) is being increasingly used for the treatment of right-sided colon cancer, although there is still no strong evidence that CME provides better long-term oncological outcomes than D2 dissection. The controversy is mainly regarding the survival benefit from extended lymph node dissection emphasized by CME. METHODS: This multicenter, open-label, randomized controlled trial (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02619942 ) was performed across 17 hospitals in China. Patients diagnosed with stage T2-T4aNanyM0 or TanyN + M0 right-sided colon cancer were randomly assigned (1:1) to undergo either CME or D2 dissection during laparoscopic right colectomy. The primary outcome was the 3-year disease-free survival (DFS), and the main secondary outcome was the 3-year overall survival (OS). RESULTS: Between January 11, 2016, and December 26, 2019, 1,072 patients were randomly assigned (536 patients to CME and 536 patients to D2 dissection). In total, 995 patients (median age 61 years, 59% male) were included in the primary analysis (CME [n = 495] v D2 dissection [n = 500]). No significant differences were found between the groups in 3-year DFS (hazard ratio [HR], 0.74 [95% CI, 0.54 to 1.02]; P = .06; 86.1% in the CME group v 81.9% in the D2 group) or in 3-year OS (HR, 0.70 [95% CI, 0.43 to 1.16]; P = .17; 94.7% in the CME group v 92.6% in the D2 group). CONCLUSION: This trial failed to find evidence of superior DFS outcome for CME compared with standard D2 lymph node dissection in primary surgical excision of right-sided colon cancer. Standard D2 dissection should be the routine procedure for these patients. CME should only be considered in patients with obvious mesocolic lymph node involvement.

1 March 2016 in Scientific Reports
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
tianfeng hetianfeng he
tianfeng he
ZYZuyao Yang
Zuyao Yang
TLTao Liu
Tao Liu
YSYueping Shen
Yueping Shen
XFXiaohong Fu
Xiaohong Fu
JTJinling Tang
Jinling Tang
To evaluate the burden of air pollution on years of life lost (YLL) in addition to mortality, we conducted a time series analysis based on the data on air pollution, meteorological conditions and 163,704 non-accidental deaths of Ningbo, China, 2009–2013. The mean concentrations of particulate matter with aerodynamic diameter <10 μm, particulate matter with aerodynamic diameter <2.5 μm, sulfur dioxide and nitrogen dioxide were 84.0 μg/m3, 60.1 μg/m3, 25.1 μg/m3 and 41.7 μg/m3, respectively. An increase of 10-μg/m3 in particulate matter with aerodynamic diameter <10 μm, particulate matter with aerodynamic diameter <2.5 μm, sulfur dioxide and nitrogen dioxide was associated with 4.27 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.17–7.38), 2.97 (95% CI −2.01–7.95), 29.98 (95% CI 19.21–40.76) and 16.58 (95% CI 8.19–24.97) YLL, respectively and 0.53% (95% CI 0.29–0.76%), 0.57% (95% CI 0.20–0.95%), 2.89% (95% CI 2.04–3.76%) and 1.65% (95% CI 1.01–2.30%) increase of daily death counts, respectively. The impact of air pollution lasted for four days (lag 0–3) and were more significant in the elderly than in the young population for both outcomes. These findings clarify the burden of air pollution on YLL and highlight the importance and urgency of air pollution control in China.

15 January 2022 in Systematic Reviews
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
YZYuelun Zhang
Yuelun Zhang
SLSiyu Liang
Siyu Liang
YFYunying Feng
Yunying Feng
QWQing Wang
Qing Wang
FSFeng Sun
Feng Sun
HPHui Pan
Hui Pan
Background: Systematic review is an indispensable tool for optimal evidence collection and evaluation in evidence-based medicine. However, the explosive increase of the original literatures makes it difficult to accomplish critical appraisal and regular update. Artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms have been applied to automate the literature screening procedure in medical systematic reviews. In these studies, different algorithms were used and results with great variance were reported. It is therefore imperative to systematically review and analyse the developed automatic methods for literature screening and their effectiveness reported in current studies. Methods: An electronic search will be conducted using PubMed, Embase, ACM Digital Library, and IEEE Xplore Digital Library databases, as well as literatures found through supplementary search in Google scholar, on automatic methods for literature screening in systematic reviews. Two reviewers will independently conduct the primary screening of the articles and data extraction, in which nonconformities will be solved by discussion with a methodologist. Data will be extracted from eligible studies, including the basic characteristics of study, the information of training set and validation set, and the function and performance of AI algorithms, and summarised in a table. The risk of bias and applicability of the eligible studies will be assessed by the two reviewers independently based on Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS-2). Quantitative analyses, if appropriate, will also be performed. Discussion: Automating systematic review process is of great help in reducing workload in evidence-based practice. Results from this systematic review will provide essential summary of the current development of AI algorithms for automatic literature screening in medical evidence synthesis and help to inspire further studies in this field. Systematic review registration: PROSPERO CRD42020170815 (28 April 2020).

1 November 2015 in Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
SYShigui Yang
Shigui Yang
DWDan Wang
Dan Wang
YZYuelun Zhang
Yuelun Zhang
CYChengbo Yu
Chengbo Yu
JRJingjing Ren
Jingjing Ren
LLLanjuan Li
Lanjuan Li
Hepatitis B and hepatitis C are 2 types of potentially life-threatening liver diseases with high infection rate. Body piercing represents a progressively popular sociocultural phenomenon which is also a potential exposure approach for hepatitis B virus (HBV) and hepatitis C virus (HCV). Conclusions from those researches with statistically risk assessment of body piercing on HBV and HCV transmission are contradictory. Systematically analyze the association between body piercing and the risk of transmitting hepatitis B virus and hepatitis C virus for general population. Make evidence-based recommendations to the current practice and wake up public awareness of this health-threatening behavior. Comprehensive and high sensitivity search strategies were performed to exhaustively search related studies before 15 January 2015 (MEDLINE, EMBASE, WANFANG, CNKI datasets for published literatures, and Google and Google scholars for related grey articles). Two authors identified relevant studies for the review, abstracted data, and assessed literature quality independently and critically according to the selection criteria and quality assessment standard. Odds ratio (OR) and corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI) were used to estimate risk of HBV and HCV infection in relation to body piercing status. Subgroup analysis and sensitivity analysis were conducted to examine the source of heterogeneity and test the robust of the results. A total of 40 studies were included in this systematic review (10 for Hep-B, 26 for Hep-C, 4 for both Hep-B and Hep-C), the pooled OR (95% CI) for the association between body piercing and transmission of HBV/HCV is 1.80 (1.18, 2.75) and 1.83 (1.27, 2.64), respectively. Subgroup analysis suggested that highest risk of body piercing related to hepatitis C infection was for former soccer and veterans with OR of 4.63 (2.65, 8.10), while strongest association between body piercing and hepatitis B was for samples derived from students/community with OR of 2.40 (1.44, 4.02). The current systematic review and meta-analysis suggests that body piercing is significantly associated with the transmission of HBV as well as HCV, having body piercing probably can increase the risk of getting infected. Evidence from this study strongly recommends that comprehensive and effective programs should be established to provide safer piercing practice.

1 July 2016 in Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
MLMing Lu
Ming Lu
ZYZuyao Yang
Zuyao Yang
QFQi Feng
Qi Feng
MYMei Yu
Mei Yu
YZYuelun Zhang
Yuelun Zhang
JTJinling Tang
Jinling Tang
Although signet ring cell cancer (SRCC) has long been regarded as an adverse prognostic factor of gastric cancer, the findings of existing studies on this issue are inconsistent. We conducted a retrospective cohort study of 2199 consecutive patients with gastric cancer treated in a tertiary cancer hospital in Beijing, China, 1994 to 2013. The characteristics of SRCC and non-SRCC were compared. The prognostic effects of SRCC and other important clinicopathological factors on overall survival were evaluated by both univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses and expressed as hazard ratio (HR) with 95% confidence interval (CI). SRCC accounted for 16.1% of gastric cancer, increasing from 6% to 20% over the last 2 decades, and was associated with younger age, female sex, poor differentiation, diffuse type, and distal location. SRCC (HR: 1.387, 95% CI: 1.177–1.634), stage (HR: 1.752, 95% CI: 1.458–2.106), surgery (palliative resection: HR: 0.712, 95% CI: 0.590–0.859; curative resection: HR: 0.490, 95% CI: 0.380–0.633), performance status (HR: 1.849, 95% CI: 1.553–2.201), and age (HR: 1.070, 95% CI: 1.001–1.143) were independent prognostic factors for gastric cancer, whereas time period of diagnosis, sex, and tumor location were not statistically significantly associated with overall survival. Subgroup analyses showed that the prognostic value of SRCC did not vary much with age, sex, performance status, stage, and surgery and chemotherapy status. As compared with non-SRCC, SRCC accounted for increasingly more of gastric cancer and was associated with younger age, female sex, poor differentiation, diffuse type, and distal location. It was an independent prognostic factor associated with worse survival in gastric cancer.