Transoral Endoscopic Thyroidectomy Vestibular Approach (TOETVA) is a novel technique with better cosmetic results. However, extraction of a large malignant thyroid nodule from the central incision of TOETVA necessitates breaking it into pieces to avoid mental nerve injury, a situation that may violate a proper oncological surgery. In this study, we sought the appropriate nodular diameter in thyroid cancer to be removed in an intact status through the central incision of the TOETVA technique. A total of 27 cases of thyroid nodules were operated using the TOETVA technique from Aug 2016 to July 2017. Excluding 10 benign goiters, the specimens of 17 thyroid cancer cases were divided into intact (group T, n=7) and fragmented (group F, n=10), with a median nodular diameter of 18.35 and 30.30 mm, respectively. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis revealed that the safest nodular diameter is 20 mm, with 100% sensitivity and 87.5% specificity.

Background: Tumor histology affects outcome after liver transplantation (LT) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). This study explores the association between F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) and tumor histology in living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) recipients and their outcome. Materials and methods: Two hundred fifty-eight patients with primary liver tumors who underwent FDG-PET before LDLT were enrolled in this retrospective study. Unfavorable tumor histology was defined as primary liver tumor other than a well-or moderately differentiated HCC. Thirteen patients had unfavorable tumor histology, including 2 poorly differentiated HCC, 2 sarcomatoid HCC, 5 combined hepatocellular cholangiocarcinoma, 3 intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, and 1 hilar cholangiocarcinoma. Results: FDG-PET positivity was significantly associated with unfavorable tumor histology (P < 0.001). Both FDG-PET positivity and unfavorable tumor histology were significant independent predictors of tumor recurrence and overall survival. In a subgroup analysis of patients with FDG-PET-positive tumors, unfavorable tumor histology was a significant independent predictor of tumor recurrence and overall survival. High FDG uptake (tumor to non-tumor uptake ratio >= 2) was a significant predictor of unfavorable tumor histology. Patients with high FDG uptake and/or unfavorable tumors had significantly higher 3-year cumulative recurrence rate (70.8% versus 26.2%, P = 0.004) and worse 3-year overall survival (34.1% versus 70.8%, P = 0.012) compared to those with low FDG uptake favorable tumors. Conclusions: The expression of FDG-PET is highly associated with histology of explanted HCC and predicts the recurrence. FDG-PET-positive tumors with high FDG uptake may be considered contraindication for LDLT due to high recurrence rate except when pathology proves favorable histology.

Background: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is increasingly managed by liver resection first then salvage liver transplantation in case of recurrence within accepted criteria. Many reports compared the safety of the salvage against the primary surgery in the setting of deceased donation but the difference in case of living donation is not sufficiently defined. Salvage living donor liver transplantation (SLDLT) is believed to be a more challenging surgery than primary living donor liver transplantation (PLDLT) due to operative field adhesions, in addition to the inherent difficulties particularly short vasculobiliary stumps. In this report, we compared both pathways from a surgical perspective in a homogenous LDLT-only cohort. Materials and methods: Over 15 years, 448 LDLTs for HCC were performed in a single liver transplant institution in Taiwan, including PLDLT (n = 348) and SLDLT (n = 100). A retrospective comparative review of the surgical outcomes of both pathways using a propensity score matching model (1-1, 100 pairs) was performed with adjustment for age, Child score and MELD score. The surgical outcome and survival were compared across 2 time eras. Results: The operative data showed that SLDLT surgery encountered more extensive adhesions (57% vs. 0%, p < 0.001), longer operative duration (650 vs. 618 min, p = 0.04), and was followed by more incidence of reexploration (16% vs. 5%, p = 0.01), than the PLDLT surgery. There was no significant difference regarding the incidence of in-hospital mortality, vascular and biliary complications, or overall survival (OS). The 1-year OS of SLDLT was inferior to PLDLT in the first 50 cases (90% vs. 98%, p = 0.03), then the same OS was found in the 2nd 50 cases (96% vs. 96%, p = 0.9). Conclusions: The SLDLT surgery is a demanding lengthy procedure with extensive adhesions and possibility of frequent re-explorations. Significant case load and high centre volume are important factors for safe practice of SLDLT and better cumulative OS.