Kylie Radford

Dr. Kylie Radford

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

17Years (2010-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 October 2017 in The American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
KRKylie Radford
Kylie Radford
KDKim Delbaere
Kim Delbaere
BDBrian Draper
Brian Draper
HMHolly Mack
Holly Mack
GDGail Daylight
Gail Daylight
GBGerald A. Broe
Gerald A. Broe

28 June 2014 in Alzheimer's & Dementia
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
KRKylie Radford
Kylie Radford
HMHolly Mack
Holly Mack
BDBrian Draper
Brian Draper
SCSimon Chalkley
Simon Chalkley
GDGail Daylight
Gail Daylight
GBGerald A. Broe
Gerald A. Broe

23 November 2010 in The Clinical Neuropsychologist
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
KRKylie Radford
Kylie Radford
SLSuncica Lah
Suncica Lah
MSMiranda J. Say
Miranda J. Say
LMLaurie A Miller
Laurie A Miller
Prospective memory problems are common in patients with brain injury, but appropriate measures are limited. The reliability and validity of the newly designed Royal Prince Alfred Prospective Memory Test (RPA-ProMem), which has three alternate versions, was investigated in 20 healthy volunteers and 20 neurological patients with everyday prospective memory problems. The RPA-ProMem was found to be easy to score reliably (inter-rater reliability = .90) and its three versions were well matched (delayed alternate-form reliability = .71). Test validity and sensitivity to patient deficits were also supported. This new measure of prospective memory should be particularly useful in situations that require repeated assessments, such as evaluation of rehabilitation efforts.

27 November 2018 in Journal of Alzheimer’s Disease
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
KRKylie Radford
Kylie Radford
LLLouise M. Lavrencic
Louise M. Lavrencic
KDKim Delbaere
Kim Delbaere
BDBrian Draper
Brian Draper
RCRobert Cumming
Robert Cumming
GBGerald A. Broe
Gerald A. Broe
Dementia prevalence in Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Australians is three to five times higher than the general Australian population. A better understanding of the underlying biomedical and social risk factors is needed to guide dementia prevention in Aboriginal Australians. The current study is the first to examine potential risk factors for dementia in the majority urban and regional population, with a representative sample of 336 Aboriginal Australians aged 60 years and older. Participants included 45 people with a dementia diagnosis ( n = 27 probable/possible Alzheimer’s disease); and 286 people without dementia. Univariate logistic regression analyses (controlling for age) identified childhood trauma, mid-life factors (history of unskilled work, past high-risk alcohol use), and medical factors (history of stroke, head injury with loss of consciousness, epilepsy) as risk factors for dementia. Multivariable analysis revealed age, childhood trauma, unskilled work, stroke, and head injury as independent predictors of all-cause dementia. A range of comorbid factors related to dementia was also identified (i.e., functional impairment, incontinence, recent hospital admission, low body mass index, living in residential care, depression, current high-risk alcohol use, social isolation, low physical activity levels). These findings extend previous outcomes in a remote Aboriginal population by highlighting that life-course social determinants of health, in addition to neurological disorders, likely play an important role in elevating dementia risk. Certain psychosocial and medical exposures are highly prevalent in Aboriginal Australians, similar to other indigenous populations, and should be considered when designing targeted and culturally appropriate prevention initiatives to reduce the burden of dementia.

10 February 2014 in International Psychogeriatrics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
KRKylie Radford
Kylie Radford
HMHolly Mack
Holly Mack
HRHamish Robertson
Hamish Robertson
BDBrian Draper
Brian Draper
SCSimon Chalkley
Simon Chalkley
GBGerald A. Broe
Gerald A. Broe
Background: Dementia is an emerging health priority in Australian Aboriginal communities, but substantial gaps remain in our understanding of this issue, particularly for the large urban section of the population. In remote Aboriginal communities, high prevalence rates of dementia at relatively young ages have been reported. The current study is investigating aging, cognitive decline, and dementia in older urban/regional Aboriginal Australians. Methods: We partnered with five Aboriginal communities across the eastern Australian state of New South Wales, to undertake a census of all Aboriginal men and women aged 60 years and over residing in these communities. This was followed by a survey of the health, well-being, and life history of all consenting participants. Participants were also screened using three cognitive instruments. Those scoring below designated cut-offs, and a 20% random sample of those scoring above (i.e. “normal” range), completed a contact person interview (with a nominated family member) and medical assessment (blind to initial screening results), which formed the basis of “gold standard” clinical consensus determinations of cognitive impairment and dementia. Conclusion: This paper details our protocol for a population-based study in collaboration with local Aboriginal community organizations. The study will provide the first available prevalence rates for dementia and cognitive impairment in a representative sample of urban Aboriginal people, across city and rural communities, where the majority of Aboriginal Australians live. It will also contribute to improved assessment of dementia and cognitive impairment and to the understanding of social determinants of successful aging, of international significance.

14 April 2015 in Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
KRKylie Radford
Kylie Radford
HMHolly Mack
Holly Mack
BDBrian Draper
Brian Draper
SCSimon Chalkley
Simon Chalkley
KDKim Delbaere
Kim Delbaere
GBGerald A. Broe
Gerald A. Broe
Background: Validated cognitive screening tools for use in urban and regional Aboriginal populations in Australia are lacking. Methods: In a cross-sectional community-based study, 235 participants were assessed on the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), the Rowland Universal Dementia Assessment Scale (RUDAS) and an urban modification of the Kimberley Indigenous Cognitive Assessment (mKICA). Performance on these cognitive screening tools was compared to dementia diagnosis by clinical consensus. Results: All tests were culturally acceptable with good psychometric properties. Receiver operating characteristic curve analyses revealed that the MMSE and mKICA were the most accurate. Conclusion: The MMSE is an effective cognitive screening tool in urban Aboriginal populations. The mKICA is a good alternative when illiteracy, language or cultural considerations deem it appropriate. The RUDAS also has adequate validity in this population.