Ronel Roos

Prof. Dr. Ronel Roos

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

25Years (2002-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
19 April 2011 in Clinical Rehabilitation
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
SHSusan Hanekom
Susan Hanekom
RGRik Gosselink
Rik Gosselink
EDElizabeth Dean
Elizabeth Dean
HAHelena van Aswegen
Helena van Aswegen
RRRonel Roos
Ronel Roos
QLQuinette Louw
Quinette Louw
Objective: To facilitate knowledge synthesis and implementation of evidence supporting early physical activity and mobilization of adult patients in the intensive care unit and its translation into practice, we developed an evidence-based clinical management algorithm.

30 August 2014 in AIDS Care
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
RRRonel Roos
Ronel Roos
HMHellen Myezwa
Hellen Myezwa
HAHelena van Aswegen
Helena van Aswegen
The promotion of physical activity is encouraged in people living with HIV and AIDS (PLWHA) as a means of promoting wellness and health. Adherence to programmes that promote exercise is often reduced, and home-based programmes are suggested to improve adherence. This study investigated the personal and environmental factors that cause barriers and facilitators of physical activity in a home-based pedometer walking programme as a means of highlighting adherence challenges. An observational study nested in a randomised controlled trial was conducted in a cohort of South African PLWHA on antiretroviral therapy over a six-month period. Descriptive analysis and qualitative content analysis of 42 participants who underwent physical activity modification assisted with data review. The mean age of the sample was 38.7 (±8.9) years, consisted mostly of women (n = 35; 83.3%) who were employed (n = 19; 45.2%) but earning very little (less than R500 per month) and often single or widowed (n = 23; 54.8%). Barriers to physical activity identified included physical complaints, e.g., low-energy levels; psychological complaints, e.g., stress levels; family responsibility, e.g., being primary caregivers; the physical environment, e.g., adverse weather conditions; social environment, e.g., domestic abuse and crime; and workplace, e.g., being in a sedentary job. Facilitators of physical activity included support and encouragement from friends and family, religious practices during worship and community environment, e.g., having access to parks and sport fields. The study is of benefit as it highlights personal and environmental factors that need to be considered when developing or implementing a home-based walking programme in PLWHA.

25 September 2020 in Disability and Rehabilitation
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
CUChuka Umeonwuka
Chuka Umeonwuka
RRRonel Roos
Ronel Roos
VNVeronica Ntsiea
Veronica Ntsiea
The purpose of this scoping review was to explore the current treatment approaches for patients with post-stroke unilateral spatial neglect. A three-step search strategy using the Johanna Briggs In...

31 July 2020 in Physical Therapy
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
DBDarren A Brown
Darren A Brown
KOKelly K. O'brien
Kelly K. O'brien
JJJo Josh
Jo Josh
SNStephanie A Nixon
Stephanie A Nixon
JHJill Hanass-Hancock
Jill Hanass-Hancock
RHRichard Harding
Richard Harding
Novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is a pandemic comparable with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) in many ways. It is an infection with no known vaccine or cure and no licensed treatments early in the pandemic, 1 presents with diverse functional problems amplified by other health conditions and aging, 2, 3 and disproportionately affects key and vulnerable populations. 1, 4 COVID-19 is increasing the burden of disease and disability and will continue to do so. 5 Rehabilitation has played and will continue to play a vital role in case management .6 Although the long-term consequences of COVID-19 remain largely unknown, evidence from the HIV experience could inform the evolving practice of COVID-19 rehabilitation.

30 December 2019 in JBI Evidence Synthesis
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
DSDorothy Agnes Shead
Dorothy Agnes Shead
RRRonel Roos
Ronel Roos
BOBenita Olivier
Benita Olivier
AIAmadi O. Ihunwo
Amadi O. Ihunwo
N this topic is sparse, and what does exist is diverse. This scoping review describes anatomy educational approaches for physiotherapy students and provides needed insight into this topic. Inclusion criteria: No limits were applied on the date of the database search or age of participants. Languages were limited to English, French, German and Spanish. Studies had to include information on gross anatomy curricula or pedagogy for physiotherapy students, or information from qualified physiotherapists or those teaching gross anatomy to physiotherapy students. Methods: Included studies were mainly sourced from EBSCOhost (CINAHL, ERIC and MEDLINE), PubMed and Scopus databases. Perusal of reference lists facilitated further retrievals. Studies published from inception up to 21 July 2019 were included. Studies were identified and screened, and the process was reported in a PRISMA flow diagram. JBI methodology for scoping reviews was followed. Selected studies were charted according to a template created and published in a JBI scoping review protocol. Results: Fifty-four studies satisfied the inclusion criteria. Various studies gave calculable length of intervention in weeks (n=14, 26%), hours (n = 7, 13%) or both (n = 21, 39%). The majority of studies (n = 50, 93%) were cross-sectional studies; three were randomized controlled trials (6%). Mean sample sizes varied from 55.3 ± 30.4 (professional behaviors, ethical and humanistic aspects) to 323.2 ± 219.7 participants (multi-modal and blended learning). Overall, 29 studies (54%) included physiotherapy students or personnel in physiotherapy anatomy programs exclusively in the sample. Other disciplines with physiotherapy students included medical students (n = 12, 22%), and occupational therapy students (n = 10, 19%). The interprofessional education category (n = 8) determined that interdisciplinary teamwork led to increased anatomical learning and awareness of future clinical roles. Computer-assisted learning (n = 9) was effective as a stand-alone or adjunct pedagogy, useful for self-study and helped anatomical knowledge retention. Team-based learning (n = 2), peer teaching (n = 6) and clinical input incorporating case-based learning and horizontal and vertical integration (n = 4) resulted in anatomical knowledge retention and were associated with mastery of anatomical understanding, an increase in examination confidence and higher examination grades. Contradictory learning outcomes resulted from the use of online videos in blended and multi-model learning studies (n = 7). Increased student participation in asynchronous online discussion forums benefitted academic learning outcomes. The category of curriculum, pedagogy and materials (n = 15) identified and compared different survey results pertaining to the curricular aspect of the objectives of this review. One study investigated the flipped classroom concept. The use of anatomy content to encourage professional, ethical and humanistic aspects (n = 3) of physiotherapy students’ behavior resulted in positive outcomes. Conclusions: This scoping review revealed a multi-faceted topic with many types of interventions and outcomes recorded. It identified variations in pedagogies, curricular content and learning approaches integral to the subject and their impact on gross anatomy education for this population. Beneficial behavioral, anatomical learning, knowledge retention and academic outcomes were identified....

16 January 2018 in Anatomical Sciences Education
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
DSDorothy A. Shead
Dorothy A. Shead
RRRonel Roos
Ronel Roos
BOBenita Olivier
Benita Olivier
AIAmadi O. Ihunwo
Amadi O. Ihunwo