Gunther Heidemann

Prof. Dr. Gunther Heidemann


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

12Years (2015-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
26 August 2015
Verified
Book Chapter
Closed access
PDF file
JSJulius Schöning
Julius Schöning
GHGunther Heidemann
Gunther Heidemann

19 September 2023 in Big Data and Cognitive Computing
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
LMleila malihi
leila malihi
GHGunther Heidemann
Gunther Heidemann
Efficient model deployment is a key focus in deep learning. This has led to the exploration of methods such as knowledge distillation and network pruning to compress models and increase their performance. In this study, we investigate the potential synergy between knowledge distillation and network pruning to achieve optimal model efficiency and improved generalization. We introduce an innovative framework for model compression that combines knowledge distillation, pruning, and fine-tuning to achieve enhanced compression while providing control over the degree of compactness. Our research is conducted on popular datasets, CIFAR-10 and CIFAR-100, employing diverse model architectures, including ResNet, DenseNet, and EfficientNet. We could calibrate the amount of compression achieved. This allows us to produce models with different degrees of compression while still being just as accurate, or even better. Notably, we demonstrate its efficacy by producing two compressed variants of ResNet 101: ResNet 50 and ResNet 18. Our results reveal intriguing findings. In most cases, the pruned and distilled student models exhibit comparable or superior accuracy to the distilled student models while utilizing significantly fewer parameters.

29 June 2024 in Applied System Innovation
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
LMleila malihi
leila malihi
GHGunther Heidemann
Gunther Heidemann
In recent years, model compression techniques have gained significant attention as a means to reduce the computational and memory requirements of deep neural networks. Knowledge distillation and pruning are two prominent approaches in this domain, each offering unique advantages in achieving model efficiency. This paper investigates the combined effects of knowledge distillation and two pruning strategies, weight pruning and channel pruning, on enhancing compression efficiency and model performance. The study introduces a metric called “Performance Efficiency” to evaluate the impact of these pruning strategies on model compression and performance. Our research is conducted on the popular datasets CIFAR-10 and CIFAR-100. We compared diverse model architectures, including ResNet, DenseNet, EfficientNet, and MobileNet. The results emphasize the efficacy of both weight and channel pruning in achieving model compression. However, a significant distinction emerges, with weight pruning showing superior performance across all four architecture types. We realized that the weight pruning method better adapts to knowledge distillation than channel pruning. Pruned models show a significant reduction in parameters without a significant reduction in accuracy.

12 February 2024 in arXiv
Verified
Preprint
Open access
PDF file
MBMohamad Ballout
Mohamad Ballout
UKUlf Krumnack
Ulf Krumnack
GHGunther Heidemann
Gunther Heidemann
KKKai-Uwe Kuehnberger
Kai-Uwe Kuehnberger
Our research demonstrates the significant benefits of using fine-tuning with explanations to enhance the performance of language models. Unlike prompting, which maintains the model's parameters, fine-tuning allows the model to learn and update its parameters during a training phase. In this study, we applied fine-tuning to various sized language models using data that contained explanations of the output rather than merely presenting the answers. We found that even smaller language models with as few as 60 million parameters benefited substantially from this approach. Interestingly, our results indicated that the detailed explanations were more beneficial to smaller models than larger ones, with the latter gaining nearly the same advantage from any form of explanation, irrespective of its length. Additionally, we demonstrate that the inclusion of explanations enables the models to solve tasks that they were not able to solve without explanations. Lastly, we argue that despite the challenging nature of adding explanations, samples that contain explanations not only reduce the volume of data required for training but also promote a more effective generalization by the model. In essence, our findings suggest that fine-tuning with explanations significantly bolsters the performance of large language models.

16 February 2024 in arXiv
Verified
Preprint
Open access
PDF file
YBYusuf Brima
Yusuf Brima
UKUlf Krumnack
Ulf Krumnack
SPSimone Pika
Simone Pika
GHGunther Heidemann
Gunther Heidemann
This paper tackles the scarcity of benchmarking data in disentangled auditory representation learning. We introduce SynTone, a synthetic dataset with explicit ground truth explanatory factors for evaluating disentanglement techniques. Benchmarking state-of-the-art methods on SynTone highlights its utility for method evaluation. Our results underscore strengths and limitations in audio disentanglement, motivating future research.