Mari Rose Aplasca DE LOS REYES

Dr. Mari Rose Aplasca DE LOS REYES

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

15Years (2012-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 September 2014 in Vaccine
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SFSharon E. Frey
Sharon E. Frey
MRMari Rose Aplasca DE LOS REYES
Mari Rose Aplasca DE LOS REYES
HRHumberto Reynales
Humberto Reynales
NBNancy Nazaire Bermal
Nancy Nazaire Bermal
UNUwe Nicolay
Uwe Nicolay
AAAshwani Kumar Arora
Ashwani Kumar Arora

9 April 2012 in Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
MRMari Rose Aplasca DE LOS REYES
Mari Rose Aplasca DE LOS REYES
EDEfren Dimaano
Efren Dimaano
NMNoel Macalalad
Noel Macalalad
Ghassan DbaiboGhassan Dbaibo
Ghassan Dbaibo
VBVéronique Bianco
Véronique Bianco
JMJacqueline M. Miller
Jacqueline M. Miller
Co-administration of meningococcal serogroups A, C, W-135 and Y conjugate vaccine (ACWY-TT) with seasonal influenza vaccine was investigated in a subset of adults enrolled in a larger study evaluating lot-to-lot consistency of ACWY-TT and non-inferiority to licensed tetravalent meningococcal polysaccharide vaccine (MenPS). Subjects in this sub-study were randomized (3:1:1) to receive ACWY-TT alone (ACWY-TT group) or with seasonal influenza vaccine (Coad), or licensed MenPS alone. Serum bactericidal antibodies (rSBA) and serum haemagglutination-inhibition (HI) antibody titers were measured pre- and 1 mo post-vaccination. Non-inferiority of the Coad group compared with ACWY-TT group was demonstrated in terms of rSBA geometric mean antibody titers (GMTs) to serogroups A, W-135 and Y. For serogroup C the pre-defined non-inferiority limit was marginally exceeded. Post-vaccination rSBA GMTs were significantly higher (exploratory analysis) in the Coad group compared with the MenPS group for serogroups A, W-135, ...

4 June 2024 in Vaccine
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
BQBeatriz Puzon Quiambao
Beatriz Puzon Quiambao
RPRonald Allan Payumo
Ronald Allan Payumo
CRCamilo Roa
Camilo Roa
CBCharissa Fay Borja-Tabora
Charissa Fay Borja-Tabora
MMMay Emmeline Montellano
May Emmeline Montellano
JMJ. Bruce McClain
J. Bruce McClain

7 August 2024 in Vaccines
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
WYWanqi Yang
Wanqi Yang
Pablo Alberto GonzálezPablo Alberto González
Pablo Alberto González
QXQianqian Xin
Qianqian Xin
MRMari Rose Aplasca DE LOS REYES
Mari Rose Aplasca DE LOS REYES
RVRalph Elvi Villalobos
Ralph Elvi Villalobos
JLJing Li
Jing Li
Objectives: In this study, we aimed to evaluate the non-inferiority of a quadrivalent influenza vaccine (QIV) developed by Sinovac Biotech Co., Ltd. (Sinovac, Beijing, China) by comparing its immunogenicity and safety with a comparator QIV (Vaxigrip Tetra®) in a population aged 3 years and older in Chile and the Philippines. Methods: A phase 3, non-inferiority, double-blind, randomized controlled, multicenter clinical trial was conducted in the southern hemisphere (SH) 2023 influenza season. Participants aged ≥ 3 years old with stable health were randomized 1:1 to receive either Sinovac QIV or comparator QIV. The co-primary outcomes were immunological non-inferiority for Sinovac QIV versus the comparator against each strain contained in the vaccines in terms of seroconversion rates (SCRs) and geometric mean titers (GMTs) of hemagglutination inhibition (HI) antibodies 28 days after final vaccination. Results: A total of 2039 participants were vaccinated (1019 Sinovac QIV; 1020 comparator QIV). Sinovac QIV induced non-inferior immune responses to all four strains as compared to comparator QIV, with slightly higher GMTs than those of comparator QIV: GMT ratios (lower limit 95% confidence interval (CI)) were 1.8 (1.6) for A(H1N1), 1.4 (1.3) for A (H3N2), 1.3 (1.1) for B Victoria and 1.2 (1.1) for B Yamagata; observed seroconversion rate differences (lower limit 95% CI) were 9.6% (6.7) for A(H1N1), 7.0% (3.5) for A(H3N2), 2.4% (−0.03) for B Victoria and 6.8% (3.0) for B Yamagata. Adverse reactions were similar across the two groups and no vaccine-related serious adverse events were reported. Conclusions: The immunogenicity of Sinovac QIV was non-inferior to that of the comparator QIV in these populations aged 3 years and older, and safety was comparable.