Introduction: The optimal timing of tracheotomy in critically ill patients remains a topic of debate. We performed a systematic review to clarify the potential benefits of early versus late tracheotomy. Methods: We searched PubMed and CENTRAL for randomized controlled trials that compared outcomes in patients managed with early and late tracheotomy. A random-effects meta-analysis, combining data from three a priori-defined categories of timing of tracheotomy (within 4 versus after 10 days, within 4 versus after 5 days, within 10 versus after 10 days), was performed to estimate the weighted mean difference (WMD) or odds ratio (OR). Results: Of the 142 studies identified in the search, 12, including a total of 2,689 patients, met the inclusion criteria. The tracheotomy rate was significantly higher with early than with late tracheotomy (87 % versus 53 %, OR 16.1 (5.7-45.7); p <0.01). Early tracheotomy was associated with more ventilator-free days (WMD 2.12 (0.94, 3.30), p <0.01), a shorter ICU stay (WMD -5.14 (-9.99, -0.28), p = 0.04), a shorter duration of sedation (WMD -5.07 (-10.03, -0.10), p <0.05) and reduced long-term mortality (OR 0.83 (0.69-0.99), p = 0.04) than late tracheotomy. Conclusions: This updated meta-analysis reveals that early tracheotomy is associated with higher tracheotomy rates and better outcomes, including more ventilator-free days, shorter ICU stays, less sedation, and reduced long-term mortality, compared to late tracheotomy.

Introduction: Several studies have reported the presence of electroencephalography (EEG) abnormalities or altered evoked potentials (EPs) during sepsis. However, the role of these tests in the diagnosis and prognostic assessment of sepsis-associated encephalopathy remains unclear. Methods: We performed a systematic search for studies evaluating EEG and/or EPs in adult (≥18 years) patients with sepsis-associated encephalopathy. The following outcomes were extracted: a) incidence of EEG/EP abnormalities; b) diagnosis of sepsis-associated delirium or encephalopathy with EEG/EP; c) outcome. Results: Among 1976 citations, 17 articles met the inclusion criteria. The incidence of EEG abnormalities during sepsis ranged from 12% to 100% for background abnormality and 6% to 12% for presence of triphasic waves. Two studies found that epileptiform discharges and electrographic seizures were more common in critically ill patients with than without sepsis. In one study, EEG background abnormalities were related to the presence and the severity of encephalopathy. Background slowing or suppression and the presence of triphasic waves were also associated with higher mortality. A few studies demonstrated that quantitative EEG analysis and EP could show significant differences in patients with sepsis compared to controls but their association with encephalopathy and outcome was not evaluated. Conclusions: Abnormalities in EEG and EPs are present in the majority of septic patients. There is some evidence to support EEG use in the detection and prognostication of sepsis-associated encephalopathy, but further clinical investigation is needed to confirm this suggestion.

Background: Patient–ventilator asynchrony (PVA) is a common problem in patients undergoing invasive mechanical ventilation (MV) in the intensive care unit (ICU), and may accelerate lung injury and diaphragm mis-contraction. The impact of PVA on clinical outcomes has not been systematically evaluated. Effective interventions (except for closed-loop ventilation) for reducing PVA are not well established. Methods: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate the impact of PVA on clinical outcomes in patients undergoing MV (Part A) and the effectiveness of interventions for patients undergoing MV except for closed-loop ventilation (Part B). We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE, EMBASE, ClinicalTrials.gov, and WHO-ICTRP until August 2020. In Part A, we defined asynchrony index (AI) ≥ 10 or ineffective triggering index (ITI) ≥ 10 as high PVA. We compared patients having high PVA with those having low PVA. Results: Eight studies in Part A and eight trials in Part B fulfilled the eligibility criteria. In Part A, five studies were related to the AI and three studies were related to the ITI. High PVA may be associated with longer duration of mechanical ventilation (mean difference, 5.16 days; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.38 to 7.94; n = 8; certainty of evidence [CoE], low), higher ICU mortality (odds ratio [OR], 2.73; 95% CI 1.76 to 4.24; n = 6; CoE, low), and higher hospital mortality (OR, 1.94; 95% CI 1.14 to 3.30; n = 5; CoE, low). In Part B, interventions involving MV mode, tidal volume, and pressure-support level were associated with reduced PVA. Sedation protocol, sedation depth, and sedation with dexmedetomidine rather than propofol were also associated with reduced PVA. Conclusions: PVA may be associated with longer MV duration, higher ICU mortality, and higher hospital mortality. Physicians may consider monitoring PVA and adjusting ventilator settings and sedatives to reduce PVA. Further studies with adjustment for confounding factors are warranted to determine the impact of PVA on clinical outcomes. Trial registration protocols.io (URL: https://www.protocols.io/view/the-impact-of-patient-ventilator-asynchrony-in-adu-bsqtndwn, 08/27/2020).

OBJECTIVES: Pediatric fulminant myocarditis is a subset of pediatric acute myocarditis associated with critical illness. We aimed to compare mortality and other outcomes such as length of hospital stay between pediatric fulminant myocarditis and nonfulminant myocarditis. For the subgroup of patients with fulminant myocarditis, we also aimed to describe the current management practices and evaluate the impact of clinically relevant factors, including hospital case volume, on mortality. DESIGN: Retrospective observational study using the Diagnosis Procedure Combination database from April 2012 to March 2018. SETTING: Over 1,000 acute care hospitals in Japan. PATIENTS: Patients with acute myocarditis less than 18 years old, including patients with fulminant myocarditis (i.e., those who received at least one of the following by day 7 of hospitalization: inotropes/vasopressors, mechanical circulatory support, or cardiopulmonary resuscitation). INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Multivariable logistic regression analysis was conducted to investigate the association between clinically relevant factors and in-hospital mortality of patients with fulminant myocarditis. Furthermore, post hoc propensity score analyses (propensity score–adjusted, propensity score–matched, and inverse probability of treatment-weighted analyses) were performed to confirm the effect of hospital case volume on in-hospital mortality. In total, 866 pediatric patients with acute myocarditis were included, and 382 (44.1%) were categorized as fulminant myocarditis. In-hospital mortality for those with fulminant myocarditis was 24.1%. fulminant myocarditis was associated with 41.3-fold greater odds of mortality than nonfulminant myocarditis (95% CI, 14.7–115.9; p < 0.001). In the subgroup of patients with fulminant myocarditis, a higher in-hospital mortality was significantly associated with younger age (≤ 5 yr; odds ratio, 3.41; 95% CI, 1.75–6.64) and the need for either mechanical ventilation (odds ratio, 2.39; 95% CI, 1.03–5.57), cardiopulmonary resuscitation (odds ratio, 10.63; 95% CI, 5.52–20.49), or renal replacement therapy (odds ratio, 2.53; 95% CI, 1.09–5.87) by day 7. A lower in-hospital mortality rate was significantly associated with treatment at hospitals in the highest pediatric fulminant myocarditis case volume tertile (≥ 6 cases in 6 yr; odds ratio, 0.30; 95% CI, 0.13–0.68) compared with treatment at hospitals in the lowest tertile (1–2 cases in 6 yr). Post hoc propensity score analyses consistently supported the primary results. CONCLUSIONS: In-hospital mortality of pediatric fulminant myocarditis in Japan remains high. Treatment at hospitals in the highest pediatric fulminant myocarditis case volume tertile (≥ 6 cases in 6 yr) was associated with a 70% relative reduction in odds of in-hospital mortality compared with treatment at hospitals in the lowest tertile (1–2 cases in 6 yr). The reasons for such differences need further study.