Berit Andersen

Prof. Berit Andersen

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

31Years (1996-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 October 2000 in Clinical Infectious Diseases
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
LØLars Østergaard
Lars Østergaard
BABerit Andersen
Berit Andersen
JMJens Kjølseth Møller
Jens Kjølseth Møller
FOFrede Olesen
Frede Olesen
We compared the efficacy of a screening program for urogenital Chlamydia trachomatis infections based on home sampling with that of a screening progr

10 November 2006 in Sexually Transmitted Infections
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
BABerit Andersen
Berit Andersen
ISIneta Sokolowski
Ineta Sokolowski
LØLars Østergaard
Lars Østergaard
JMJens Kjølseth Møller
Jens Kjølseth Møller
FOFrede Olesen
Frede Olesen
JJJørgen Skov Jensen
Jørgen Skov Jensen
Background:Mycoplasma genitalium has been shown to cause urethritis in men and cervicitis in women and may also be a causative agent in female infertility. Objective: To estimate the prevalence of urogenital M genitalium infection and identify sexual behavioural risk factors in the general population. Methods: Participating individuals were 731 men and 921 women aged 21–23 years and not seeking the healthcare system because of symptoms. They answered questionnaires on sexual behaviour and provided samples for M genitalium testing. Results: In women aged 21–23 years, the prevalence of infection was 2.3% (21/921) and in men of the same age it was 1.1% (8/731). For both sexes, an increasing number of partners was associated with a greater chance of being infected. Among women a shorter duration of a steady relationship and having a partner with symptoms was associated with being infected, and for men younger age at first intercourse was associated with M genitalium infection. Conclusions: We conclude that the prevalence of infection in the general population is too low for population-based screening. However, the development of test algorithms based on behavioural risk factors is a promising alternative.

15 January 2002 in The Journal of Infectious Diseases
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
BABerit Andersen
Berit Andersen
FOFrede Olesen
Frede Olesen
JMJens Kjølseth Møller
Jens Kjølseth Møller
LØLars Østergaard
Lars Østergaard
The effect of 2 population-based outreach screening strategies that used in-home sampling was compared with usual care practices for Chlamydia tracho

9 March 2018 in BMC Cancer
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MTMette Tranberg
Mette Tranberg
BBBodil Hammer Bech
Bodil Hammer Bech
JBJan Blaakaer
Jan Blaakaer
JJJørgen Skov Jensen
Jørgen Skov Jensen
HSHans Svanholm
Hans Svanholm
BABerit Andersen
Berit Andersen
Cervical cancer screening participation remains insufficient in most countries. Our aim was to evaluate whether offering a HPV self-sampling kit, either mailed directly to the woman’s home or using timely opt-in procedures for ordering the kit, increased screening participation compared with a standard second reminder. In this randomized, controlled effectiveness trial, 9791 Danish women aged 30–64 who were due to receive the second reminder were equally randomized to either: 1) direct mailing of a second reminder and a self-sampling kit (directly mailed group); 2) mailing of a second reminder that offered a self-sampling kit to be ordered by e-mail, text message, phone, or webpage (opt-in group); or 3) mailing of a second reminder to attend regular cytology screening (control group). In an intention-to-treat analysis, we estimated the participation rate at 180 days post intervention, by returning a self-sample or attending regular cytology screening. We calculated the proportion of women with a positive HPV self-sample who attended for cervical cytology triage at the general practitioner within 90 days. Participation was significantly higher in the directly mailed group (38.0%) and in the opt-in group (30.9%) than in the control group (25.2%) (participation difference (PD): 12.8%, 95% CI: 10.6–15.0% and PD: 5.7%, 95% CI: 3.5–7.9%, respectively). Within 90 days, 107 women (90.7%, 95% CI: 83.9–95.3%) with a HPV-positive self-sample attended follow-up. Offering the opportunity of HPV self-sampling as an alternative to regular cytology screening increased participation; the direct mailing strategy was the most effective invitation strategy. A high compliance with follow-up was seen. Current Controlled Trials NCT02680262 . Registered 10 February 2016.

1 December 2018 in Cancer Epidemiology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SNSisse Njor
Sisse Njor
LFLennart Friis-Hansen
Lennart Friis-Hansen
BABerit Andersen
Berit Andersen
BSBo Søndergaard
Bo Søndergaard
DLDorte Linnemann
Dorte Linnemann
MRMorten Rasmussen
Morten Rasmussen

4 July 1998 in BMJ
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
LØLars Østergaard
Lars Østergaard
BABerit Andersen
Berit Andersen
FOFrede Olesen
Frede Olesen
JMJens Kjølseth Møller
Jens Kjølseth Møller
We randomised all 17 high schools in Aarhus County into two screening groups. In the home sampling group the females were asked to collect two urine samples and one vaginal flush sample3 and the males were asked to collect one first void urine sample. These samples were mailed directly from home to the microbiology department at Aarhus University Hospital. In the usual testing (control) group the students were offered testing at their doctors or at the local clinic for sexually transmitted diseases. Both groups received a questionnaire and information on C trachomatis infection. The students were asked for their identification number, from which the number of infected respondents in the control group was calculated.