Background and Objectives: The incidence of hip fractures in people of advanced ages is increasing due to our aging society. Patient positioning for the intertrochanteric fractures of the femur can be performed in various ways. The aim of this study is to clinically and radiologically compare the use of the supine hemilithotomy position, the lateral decubitus position, and the traction table when performing proximal femoral nail (PFN) surgery for femoral intertrochanteric fractures in the geriatric age group. Materials and Methods: A total of 170 elderly patients with femoral intertrochanteric fractures were included in this cross-sectional study. The patients were divided into three groups (the supine hemilithotomy group, the lateral decubitus group, and the fracture table group). For the postoperative period, complications, length of stay in the intensive care unit, and length of stay in hospital were examined, while in postoperative radiographs, tip–apex distances (TADs), collodiaphyseal angles (CDAs), and Cleveland–Bosworth quadrants were examined to evaluate the placement of the lag screw in the femoral head. The quality of fracture reduction was evaluated according to the modified Baumgaertner criteria. Results: The mean age of the patients was 77.8 ± 8.8; 57.6% of patients were female. According to the modified Baumgaertner criteria, it was determined that patients with ‘poor’ reduction quality had an approximately ten times higher risk of cut-out than those with ‘good’ reduction quality (OR = 10.111, p = 0.002, 95% confidence interval; 2.313–44.207). The operative time for patients in the fracture table group was longer than that of the other groups Additionally, the CDA in the supine hemilithotomy position group was longer. Conclusions: Although PFN surgery using the traction table is longer in terms of surgical time compared to surgery performed in the lateral decubitus position and the supine hemilitotomy position, it is advantageous in terms of better TAD and CDA values and lower complication rates.

Background and objectives: The incidence of hip fractures in advanced age is increasing due to the aging society. In trochanteric region fractures of the femur, patient positioning can be performed various ways. The aim of this study is to clinically and radiologically compare the use of the supine hemilithotomy position, the lateral decubitus position, and the traction table when performing PFN surgery for femoral intertrochanteric fractures in the geriatric age group.Materials and Methods: A total of 170 older patients with femoral intertrochanteric fractures were included in this cross-sectional study. The patients were divided into three groups the supine hemilithotomy group, lateral decubitus group and fracture table. For the postoperative period, complications, length of stay in the intensive care unit, and length of stay in hospital were examined, while in postoperative radiographs, tip-apex distance (TAD), collodiaphyseal angle (CDA), and Cleveland-Bosworth quadrants were examined to evaluate the placement of the lag screw in the femoral head. Quality of fracture reduction was evaluated according to the modified Baumgaertner criteria.Results: The mean age of the patients was 77.77±8.8; 57.6% of patients were female. According to the modified Baumgaertner criteria, it was determined that patients with ‘poor’ reduction quality had an approximately ten times higher risk of cut-out than those with ‘good’ reduction quality. (OR = 10.111, p = 0.002, 95% confidence interval; 2.313-44.207). The duration of surgery of patient in the fracture table group was found to be higher than in the other groups, the CDA in the supine position group were found lower than in the other groups, and the TAD in the supine position group was found higher than in the other groups. Complications were mostly detected in patients who underwent surgery in the lateral decubitus position. (p<0,05) Conclusion: We believe that it is necessary to be familiar with all methods, since it is very difficult to choose the most appropriate method according to the surgeon’s experience, the hospital’s facilities and conditions, and the patient’s clinical status.

Background/Objectives: Meniscal tears frequently occur during athletic activities and are often associated with anterior cruciate ligament injuries. The purpose of this study was to compare the posterior tibial slope (PTS) in young adults undergoing arthroscopic surgery for isolated meniscal tears with that of a control group, and to investigate its association with meniscal tears. Methods: This retrospective, single-centre, controlled study included 190 patients aged 18–30 years who presented with unilateral knee pain and underwent knee magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) between 2015 and 2022. Patients with an isolated medial meniscal tear (Group A, n = 67) or an isolated lateral meniscal tear (Group B, n = 31), confirmed on MRI and directly with arthroscopy, were compared with a symptomatic control group who presented with knee pain but had no meniscal or anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tear on MRI (Group C, n = 92). Medial and lateral PTS angles were measured on pre-existing standing lateral knee radiographs. Interobserver and intraobserver reliability were quantified using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs). Group comparisons, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis with the Youden index, and multivariable binary logistic regression adjusted for age, sex and side were performed. Results: Both medial and lateral PTS angles were significantly higher in Groups A and B than in the control group (p < 0.05). ROC analysis identified a cut-off of 9.2° for the medial PTS in the medial-tear group (AUC: 0.756, 95% CI: 0.68–0.83; sensitivity: 64.18%, specificity: 80.43%) and 9.9° for the lateral PTS in the lateral-tear group (AUC: 0.709, 95% CI: 0.60–0.82; sensitivity: 58.06%, specificity: 81.52%). The association persisted after adjustment for age, sex and side (medial slope in medial tears adjusted OR: 1.36 per 1°, 95% CI: 1.19–1.55, p < 0.001; lateral slope in lateral tears adjusted OR: 1.25 per 1°, 95% CI: 1.08–1.44, p = 0.003). Conclusions: In this retrospective cohort of young adults, an increased posterior tibial slope was associated with isolated meniscal tears. A medial PTS greater than 9.2° and a lateral PTS greater than 9.9° were associated with medial and lateral meniscal tears, respectively. Given the modest sensitivity and the observational design, PTS should be regarded as a supportive morphological marker rather than a stand-alone diagnostic metric, and a causal relationship cannot be inferred based on the results of this study. Because discrimination was only fair (AUC 0.693–0.756) and sensitivity limited (54.8–64.2%), these cut-offs are not clinically applicable decision thresholds and should be used only in conjunction with clinical assessment and MRI.