Lilla Tamási

Prof. Dr. Lilla Tamási


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

15Years (2012-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
30 April 2021 in Pathology and Oncology Research
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
LTLilla Tamási
Lilla Tamási
KHKrisztián Horváth
Krisztián Horváth
ZKZoltan Kiss
Zoltan Kiss
KBKrisztina Bogos
Krisztina Bogos
GOGyula Ostoros
Gyula Ostoros
GGGabriella Gálffy
Gabriella Gálffy
Objective: No assessment was conducted describing the age and gender specific epidemiology of lung cancer (LC) prior to 2018 in Hungary, thus the objective of this study was to appraise the detailed epidemiology of lung cancer (ICD-10 C34) in Hungary based on a retrospective analysis of the National Health Insurance Fund database.Methods: This longitudinal study included patients aged ≥20 years with LC diagnosis (ICD-10 C34) between January 1, 2011 and December 31, 2016. Patients with different cancer-related codes 6 months before or 12 months after LC diagnosis or having any cancer treatment other than lung cancer protocols were excluded.Results: Lung cancer incidence and mortality increased with age, peaking in the 70–79 age group (375.0/100,000 person-years) among males, while at 60–69 age group for females (148.1/100,000 person-years). The male-to-female incidence rate ratio reached 2.46–3.01 (p < 0.0001) among the 70–79 age group. We found 2–11% decrease in male incidence rate at most age groups, while a significant 1–3% increase was observed in older females (>60) annually during the study period.Conclusion: This nationwide epidemiology study demonstrated that LC incidence and mortality in Hungary decreased in younger male and female population, however we found significant increase of incidence in older female population, similar to international trends. Incidence rates peaked in younger age-groups compared to Western countries, most likely due to higher smoking prevalence in these cohorts, while lower age LC incidence could be attributed to higher competing cardiovascular risk resulting in earlier mortality in smoking population.

1 September 2019 in Journal of Asthma and Allergy
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
GTGábor Tomisa
Gábor Tomisa
AHAlpár Horváth
Alpár Horváth
ZSZsuzsanna Szalai
Zsuzsanna Szalai
VMVeronika Müller
Veronika Müller
LTLilla Tamási
Lilla Tamási
Background: Risk factors for poor asthma outcomes may have considerable influence on the control level and medical care of asthmatic patients. Our objective was to conduct a study that provides data on the level of symptom control and the frequency of specific risk factors for poor asthma outcomes on a large patient cohort. Methods: A cross-sectional, non-interventional real-life study was conducted among asthmatic patients treated by respiratory specialists in Hungary. Asthma control and risk factor assessment were done according to Global Initiative for Asthma guideline (Box 2–2). In the data analysis, phase descriptive statistics, graphical outputs, and Fisher’s exact tests were used. Results: Of 12743 patients enrolled by 187 specialists, asthma was well controlled in 36.0%, partially controlled in 29.29%, and uncontrolled in 34.71% of the cases. The most common comorbidities were rhinitis/sinusitis (66.84%), cardiovascular diseases (43.81%), and gastroesophageal reflux disease (20.11%). The following risk factors had the strongest relationship with uncontrolled disease: incorrect inhaler technique causing side effects (odds ratio, OR 4.86, 3.51–6.8), previous severe exacerbation (OR 4.79, 4.02–5.72), high short-acting beta agonist (SABA) use (OR 4.46, 4.03–4.93), incorrect inhaler technique associated with an exacerbation (OR 3.91, 3.06–5.03), and persistently low forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1, OR 3.14, 2.8–3.52). The most frequent risk factors were smoking (OR 1.47, 1.36–1.59) and obesity (OR 1.34, 1.24–1.45). Furthermore, high loss of control was associated with an initial low FEV1 (OR 2.21, 2.01–2.44), frequent oral corticosteroid (OCS) use (OR 1.83, 1.64–2.05), poor adherence to treatment (OR 2.51, 2.21–2.86), and allergen exposure (OR 1.63, 1.47–1.81). Conclusions: This study indicated that the presence of risk factors for poor asthma outcomes listed by the Global Initiative for Asthma document significantly influenced actual control level in a real-world large patient cohort, with high SABA use, previous severe exacerbation, incorrect inhaler technique, persistently low FEV1, and poor adherence to treatment having the highest impact.

31 July 2018 in Advances in Therapy
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
LTLilla Tamási
Lilla Tamási
MSMaria Szilasi
Maria Szilasi
GGGabriella Gálffy
Gabriella Gálffy
The effectiveness of inhaled therapies can be influenced by many factors, including the type of inhaler, which may have clinical implications. We report a real-world, multicenter, open-label, non-randomized, non-interventional study conducted by 200 pulmonologists across 200 centers in Hungary. The effectiveness of budesonide/formoterol inhalation therapy in daily clinical practice, delivered via the Bufomix Easyhaler®, was evaluated in patients with asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and asthma-COPD overlap (ACO).

17 October 2012 in Journal of Clinical Immunology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
ZWZsóka Weiszhár
Zsóka Weiszhár
Andras BikovAndras Bikov
Andras Bikov
GGGabriella Gálffy
Gabriella Gálffy
LTLilla Tamási
Lilla Tamási
IUIldikó Ungvári
Ildikó Ungvári
Ildikó HorváthIldikó Horváth
Ildikó Horváth

30 April 2021 in Pathology and Oncology Research
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
KBKrisztina Bogos
Krisztina Bogos
ZKZoltan Kiss
Zoltan Kiss
LTLilla Tamási
Lilla Tamási
GOGyula Ostoros
Gyula Ostoros
VMVeronika Müller
Veronika Müller
Judit MoldvayJudit Moldvay
Judit Moldvay
Objective: Lung cancer is one of the most common cancers worldwide and its survival is still poor. The objective of our study was to estimate long-term survival of Hungarian lung cancer patients at first time based on a nationwide review of the National Health Insurance Fund database.Methods: Our retrospective, longitudinal study included patients aged ≥20 years who were diagnosed with lung cancer (ICD-10 C34) between January 1, 2011 and December 31, 2016. Survival rates were evaluated by year of diagnosis, patient gender and age, and morphology of lung cancer.Results: 41,854 newly diagnosed lung cancer patients were recorded. Mean age at diagnosis varied between 64.7 and 65.9 years during study period. One- and 5-year overall survival rates for the total population were 42.2 and 17.9%, respectively. Survival was statistically associated with gender, age and type of lung cancer. Female patients (n = 16,362) had 23% better survival (HR: 0.77, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.75–0.79; p < 0.001) than males (n = 25,492). The highest survival rates were found in the 20–49 age cohort (5Y = 31.3%) and if the cancer type was adenocarcinoma (5Y = 20.5%). We measured 5.3% improvement (9.2% adjusted) in lung cancer survival comparing the period 2015–2016 to 2011–2012 (HR: 0.95 95% CI: 0.92–0.97; p = 0.003), the highest at females <60 year (0.86 (adjusted HR was 0.79), interaction analysis was significant for age and histology types.Conclusion: Our study provided long-term Lung cancer survival data in Hungary for the first time. We found a 5.3% improvement in 5-year survival in 4 years. Women and young patients had better survival. Survival rates were comparable to–and at the higher end of–rates registered in other East-Central European countries (7.7%–15.7%).

1 January 2017 in Canadian Respiratory Journal
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
BDBrigitta Dombai
Brigitta Dombai
IIIstván Ivancsó
István Ivancsó
Andras BikovAndras Bikov
Andras Bikov
DODóra Oroszi
Dóra Oroszi
ABAnikó Bohács
Anikó Bohács
LTLilla Tamási
Lilla Tamási
Asthma in pregnancy poses a risk of adverse outcomes. Osteopontin and clusterin emerged as asthma biomarkers; however, their circulating levels during pregnancy are unknown yet. This cross-sectional study investigated peripheral osteopontin and clusterin levels and their relationship to disease control in 26 asthmatic pregnant (AP), 22 asthmatic nonpregnant (ANP), and 25 healthy pregnant (HP) women and 12 healthy controls (HNP). Osteopontin levels of ANP and HNP were similar (2.142[1.483–2.701]versus 2.075[1.680–2.331] ng/mL,p=0.7331). Pregnancy caused a marked elevation in both healthy (HP: 3.037[2.439–4.015] ng/ml,p=0.003versus HNP) and asthmatic (AP: 2.693[1.581–3.620] ng/ml) patients; thus the pregnant groups did not differ (p=0.3541). Circulating clusterin levels were comparable in ANP and HNP (109.2[95.59–116.3]versus 108.8[97.94–115.3] µg/mL,p=0.8730) and the level was lower in HP (98.80[84.26–105.5] µg/mL,p=0.0344versus HNP). In contrast, the level was higher in AP (111.7[98.84–125.6] µg/mL,p=0.0091versus HP). In ANP, a positive correlation of PEF (r=0.3405;p=0.0221) and a negative correlation ofRaw(r=-0.3723;p=0.0128) to clusterin level were detected. Circulating osteopontin level increases in pregnancy regardless of concomitant well-controlled asthma, indicating its gestational role. Clusterin level decreases in healthy but not in asthmatic pregnancy and correlates directly with lung function.