Diabetes mellitus (DM) results from the inability of the pancreas to produce sufficient insulin or weakened cellular response to the insulin produced, which leads to hyperglycemia. Current treatments of DM focus on the use of oral hypoglycemic drugs such as acarbose, alpha-glucose inhibitors, sulphonylureas, thiazolidinediones, and biguanides to control blood glucose levels. However, these medications are known to have various side effects in addition to their bioavailability, efficacy, and safety concerns. These drawbacks have increased interest in the anti-diabetic potential of plant-derived bioactive compounds such as oleanolic and maslinic acids. Although their efficacy in ameliorating blood glucose levels has been reported in several studies, their bioavailability and efficacy remain of concern. The current review examines the anti-diabetic effects of oleanolic, maslinic, asiatic, ursolic, and corosolic acids and their derivatives, as well as the progress made thus far to enhance their bioavailability and efficacy. The literature for the current review was gathered from leading academic databases—including Google Scholar and PubMed—the key words listed below were used. The literature was searched as widely and comprehensively as possible without a defined range of dates.

Objectives: This study characterised and evaluated the stability, solubility, and in vitro drug release of OA- and AA-loaded SLNs. Methods: The OA- and AA-SLNs were formulated using the emulsion solvent evaporation method and characterised based on particle size (PS), polydispersity index (PDI), zeta potential (ZP), and transmission electron microscopy (TEM). Solubility studies were conducted in PBS (pH 1.2 and 6.8) and dH₂O using HPLC, while in vitro drug release was assessed in simulated intestinal fluid (SIF) (pH 6.8). Results: The optimised OA-SLNs (1:1 drug-to-lipid ratio) showed PS, PDI, ZP, and EE% values of 312.9 ± 3.617 nm, 0.157 ± 0.014, −17.0 ± 0.513 mV, and 86.54 ± 1.818%, respectively. The optimised AA-SLNs (1:2 drug-to-lipid: ratio) had a PS of 115.5 ± 0.458 nm, PDI of 0.255 ± 0.007, ZP of −11.9 ± 0.321 mV, and EE% of 76.22 ± 0.436%. The SLNs remained stable for 60 days at 4 °C and room temperature (p < 0.05). The solubility study revealed that free OA and AA showed no measurable values in the three solvents. However, OA-SLNs showed the highest solubility in H₂O (16-fold) followed by PBS at pH 6.8 (10-fold) and pH 1.2 (10-fold). AA-SLNs significantly improved the solubility in PBS at pH 6.8 (88-fold), compared to dH₂O (6-fold) and PBS at pH 1.2 (26-fold). In vitro drug release studies showed that OA release from the SLNs was significantly increased within 300 min (p < 0.05) compared to the free drug. Similarly, AA release from the SLNs was significantly increased within 300 min (p < 0.05) compared to free AA. Conclusions: These results demonstrate that SLNs enhance OA and AA solubility and drug release, suggesting a promising strategy for improving oral bioavailability and therapeutic efficacy.