PON1 is a Ca²⁺-dependent enzyme that indicates a hydrolytic activity towards a broad spectrum of substrates. The mechanism of hydrolysis catalyzed by this enzyme is poorly understood. It was shown that the active site of PON1 is highly dynamic. The catalytic center of this enzyme consists of side chains of amino acids binding two calcium ions, from which the first one performs a structural function and the other one is responsible for the catalytic properties of PON1. This review summarizes available information on the structure of PONs, the role of amino acids located in the active site in specificity, and multiple substrate affinity of enzymes for understanding and explaining the basis of the physiological function of PONs. Moreover, in this paper, we described the changes in the structure of PONs induced by environmental and genetic factors and their association with diseases. The detoxification efficiency depends on the polymorphism of the PON1 gene, especially Q192R. However, data on the association between single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in the PON1 gene and cardiovascular or neurodegenerative diseases are insufficient. The reviewed papers may confirm that PON1 is a very promising tool for diagnostics, but further studies are required.

Mycophenolic acid (MPA) is widely used in solid organ transplantation. MPA absorption from enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium (EC-MPS) is delayed, which results in a delayed enterohepatic recirculation and subsequently higher and more variable MPA 12-hour trough concentration and tmax values. Therefore, MPA trough level monitoring cannot be used to monitor MPA exposure in patients who are given EC-MPS. The aim of the study was to develop and validate a limited sampling strategy (LSS) for accurate prediction of the 12-hour area under the concentration-time curve (AUC0-12h) for MPA in patients who receive concomitant EC-MPS and Tacrolimus (Prograf or Advagraf) within 196 months posttransplantation. According to our knowledge, the LSS for MPA AUC estimation using high-performance liquid chromatography to determine MPA concentrations in plasma samples of kidney and liver transplant patients receiving EC-MPS and Tacrolimus (Advagraf) has not been previously evaluated. Seventy-four renal and liver transplant patients receiving EC-MPS and concomitant tacrolimus (either Prograf or Advagraf) provided a total of 74 pharmacokinetic profiles. MPA concentrations were measured using a validated high-performance liquid chromatography method for 9 plasma samples collected at predose and at 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 9, and 12 hours after the morning dose of EC-MPS after an overnight fast. LSS were developed and validated by stepwise multiple regression analysis with the use of a 2-group method (test, n = 37; and validation, n = 37). The 3 and 4 time point equations using C1h, C3h, C9h and C1h, C2h, C3h, C6h, respectively, were found to be superior to all other models tested. When these LSS models were tested in the validation group, the results were acceptable [for 3 time points equation: r = 0.824, percentage of prediction error: 6.32 ± 25.75, 95% confidence interval (CI): -40.71 to 79.76; percentage of absolute prediction error: 27.45 ± 29.89, 95% CI: 0.04-199.92, predictive performance, 71% of estimated AUCs comprised within 85%-115% of the measured full MPA AUC, natural logarithmic residuals (ln) mean ± SD: -0.03 ± 0.24; for 4 time points equation: r = 0.898, percentage of prediction error: 3.32 ± 18.26, 95% CI: -49.35 to 51.06; percentage of absolute prediction error: 14.05 ± 11.89, 95% CI 0.13-49.86, percentage of predictive performance, 83% of estimated AUCs comprised within 85%-115% of the measured full MPA AUC, natural logarithmic residuals (ln) mean ± SD: -0.01 ± 0.19]. LSS equations using concentrations at 1, 3, and 9 hours or 1, 2, 3, and 6 hours time points provided the most reliable and accurate estimations of the MPA AUC in stable renal and liver transplant recipients treated with EC-MPS and tacrolimus. Further studies on independent groups of patients are required to confirm clinical utility of the presented LSS models.

There is accumulating evidence on the perinatal aspects of COVID-19, but available data are still insufficient. The reports on perinatal aspects of COVID-19 have been published on a small group of patients. Vertical transmission has been noted. The SARS-CoV-2 genome can be detected in umbilical cord blood and at-term placenta, and the infants demonstrate elevated SARS-CoV-2-specific IgG and IgM antibody levels. In this work, the analysis of clinical characteristics of RT-PCR SARS-CoV-2-positive pregnant women and their infants, along with the placental pathology correlation results, including villous trophoblast immunoexpression status for SARS-CoV-2 antibody, is presented. RT-PCR SARS-CoV-2 amniotic fluid testing was performed. Neonatal surveillance of infection status comprised RT-PCR testing of a nasopharyngeal swab and the measuring of levels of anti-SARS-CoV-2 in blood serum. In the initial study group were 161 pregnant women with positive test results. From that group, women who delivered during the hospital stay were selected for further analysis. Clinical data, laboratory results, placental histomorphology results, and neonatal outcomes were compared in women with immunohistochemistry (IHC)-con SARS-CoV-2-positive and IHC SARS-CoV-2-negative placentas (26 cases). A positive placental immunoprofile was noted in 8% of cases (n = 2), whereas 92% of cases were negative (n = 24). Women with placental infection proven by IHC had significantly different pathological findings from those without. One infected neonate was noted (n = 1; 4%). Infection was confirmed in perinatal autopsy, as there was the intrauterine fetal demise. The potential course of the infection with the risk of vertical transmission and implications for fetal–neonatal condition is critical for proper clinical management, which will involve comprehensive, multidisciplinary perinatal care for SARS-CoV-2-positive patients.

Background. It is still unclear whether COVID-19 convalescent kidney transplant recipients (KTR) and hemodialysis (HD) patients can develop anti-SARS-CoV-2 adaptive immunity. The aim was to characterize and compare the immune response to the virus in HD patients and KTR. Methods. The study included 26 HD patients and 54 KTR—both convalescent (14 HD, 25 KTR) and unexposed. The immune response was assessed by determining the anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in serum and specific T cell response via the interferon-gamma release assay (IGRA). Moreover, blood-morphology-derived parameters, immune cell phenotypes, and acute phase reactants were evaluated. Results. KRT and HD convalescents presented similar serum levels of anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG and IgA. A negative correlation occurred between IgG and time after the infection was observed. There was a strong relationship between the prevalence of anti-SARS-CoV-2 cellular and humoral responses in both groups. Convalescent IGRA response was significantly higher in HD patients compared to KTR. Conclusions. HD patients and KTR develop humoral and cellular responses after COVID-19. The antibodies levels are similar in both groups of patients. SARS-CoV-2-reactive T cell response is stronger in HD patients compared to KTR. The SARS-CoV-2-specific IgG level decreases with time while IgA and a cellular response are maintained. IGRA proved to be a valuable test for the assessment of specific cellular immunity in immunocompromised HD patients and KTR.

(1) Background: Kidney transplantation is the best therapy for patients with end-stage renal disease, but the risk of rejection complicates it. Indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase 1 (IDO1), an enzyme involved in immune response modulation, has been suggested to play a role in transplant immunological injury. The aim of the study was to explore the expression of IDO1 in the interstitial foci of transplanted kidneys and its potential association with rejection episodes. (2) Methods: This retrospective study analysed kidney transplant biopsies from 121 patients, focusing on IDO1 expression in interstitial foci. Immunohistochemistry was used to detect IDO1, and patients were categorised based on IDO1 presence (IDO1-IF positive or negative). The incidence of rejection was compared between these groups. (3) Results: Patients with IDO1 expression in interstitial foci (IDO1-IF(+)) exhibited higher incidences of rejection 46/80 (57.5%) vs. 10/41 (24.34%) patients compared to IDO1-IF(−) patients, which was statistically significant with p = 0.0005. The analysis of antibody-mediated rejection showed that IDO1-IF(+) patients developed AMR at 12/80 (15%), while only 1 IDO1-IF(−) negative patient did (2,44%), with p = 0.035. T-cell-mediated rejection was also more common in IDO1-IF(+) patients 43/80 (53.75%) than in IDO1-IF(−) patients 7/41 (17.07%), with p = 0.0001. (4) Conclusions: IDO1 expression in interstitial foci of renal transplant biopsies is associated with a higher incidence of rejection, suggesting that IDO1 could serve as a potential biomarker for transplant rejection. These findings highlight the importance of IDO1 in immune regulation and its potential utility in improving the management of kidney transplant recipients.

Motor disorders are increasingly recognized as a significant complication of chronic kidney disease (CKD), yet they remain underdiagnosed, undertreated, and often overlooked in clinical practice. Patients with CKD experience a broad spectrum of motor disturbances, including restless legs syndrome, myoclonus, flapping tremor, periodic limb movements in sleep, Parkinsonism, and peripheral neuropathy. These disorders arise from complex and often overlapping mechanisms such as uremic neurotoxicity, vascular injury, electrolyte and hormonal imbalances, or inflammatory processes, reflecting the systemic impact of impaired renal function on the central and peripheral nervous systems. The presence of motor disorders in CKD is associated with substantial clinical consequences for quality of life, contributing to impaired mobility, persistent insomnia, daytime fatigue, higher fall risk, and diminished independence. Moreover, these disturbances have been linked to increased cardiovascular morbidity and mortality, further exacerbating the already high burden of disease in this population. Current management approaches focus on optimizing kidney function through dialysis or transplantation, pharmacological therapies such as dopaminergic agents, gabapentinoids, and iron supplementation, as well as non-pharmacological interventions including structured exercise programs and sleep hygiene measures. Despite these strategies, robust evidence on long-term outcomes, comparative effectiveness, and optimal treatment algorithms remains limited. Greater recognition of the clinical impact of motor disorders in CKD, combined with targeted research efforts, is urgently needed to improve patient-centered outcomes and guide evidence-based care.