The gut microbiota’s pivotal role in human health is increasingly evident, particularly in chronic conditions like obesity, diabetes, and inflammatory diseases. This intricate symbiotic relationship influences metabolic balance and immune responses. Notably, gut microbial dysbiosis is linked to obesity’s metabolic disruption and chronic low-grade inflammation. Similarly, in diabetes, the microbiota’s impact on insulin resistance and glucose metabolism is becoming evident. Chronic inflammation, a common denominator in these conditions, is also a recognized precursor to carcinogenesis. This intersection prompts a compelling question: does the gut microbiota’s influence extend to gastrointestinal cancers like colorectal and pancreatic cancer? These malignancies are closely intertwined with inflammation and metabolic dysregulation. Exploring whether the microbial signatures associated with chronic conditions overlap with precancerous or cancerous states offers new perspectives. This article reviews emerging evidence on the interplay between the gut microbiota, chronic conditions, and gastrointestinal cancers. By elucidating these connections, we aim to uncover potential avenues for innovative diagnostic, preventative, and therapeutic strategies in colorectal and pancreatic cancer management.

Breast cancer (BC) is a malignant tumor originating from the epithelium of the breast tissue. There is no single etiological factor in the development of breast cancer. In 310% of patients with breast cancer, the development of the disease is associated with the presence of mutations in the breast cancer gene (BRCA) 1, BRCA2, CHEK, NBS1, TP53. In other patients, breast cancer is sporadic.

Background: Approximately 5–10% of all cancers are associated with hereditary cancer predisposition syndromes (HCPS). Early identification of HCPS is facilitated by widespread use of next-generation sequencing (NGS) and brings significant benefits to both the patient and their relatives. This study aims to evaluate the landscape of genetic variants in patients with personal and/or family history of cancer using NGS-based multigene panel testing. Materials and Methods: The study cohort included 1117 probands from Russia: 1060 (94.9%) patients with clinical signs of HCPS and 57 (5.1%) healthy individuals with family history of cancer. NGS analysis of 76 HCPS genes was performed using a custom Roche NimbleGen enrichment panel. Results: Pathogenic/likely pathogenic variants were identified in 378 of 1117 individuals (33.8%). The predominant number (59.8%) of genetic variants was identified in BRCA1/BRCA2 genes. CHEK2 was the second most commonly altered gene with a total of 28 (7.4%) variants, and 124 (32.8%) genetic variants were found in other 35 cancer-associated genes with variable penetrance. Conclusions: Multigene panel testing allows for a differential diagnosis and identification of high-risk group for oncological diseases. Our results demonstrate that inclusion of non-coding gene regions into HCPS gene panels is highly important for the identification of rare spliceogenic variants with high penetrance.

E13035 Background: EMPOWER trial demonstrated the benefit of eribulin administrated post CD4/6i in patients (pts) with HR+ HER2-negative (HR+HER2-) metastatic breast cancer (MBC). There are several important limitations to this trial: > 60% of pts were stage IV at the time of treatment initiation, eribulin used in late lines (2L only in 30% pts) and follow-up data were immature. Current study aimed to provide additional data on the real-world effectiveness and safety of eribulin monotherapy in this setting. Methods: Observation study of eribulin monotherapy in standard regimen enrolled 54 pts (median age 56; range 29-79 years) with HR+ HER2- MBC received at least one dose of eribulin post CDK 4/6i in metastatic settings; 24% pts had de novo metastatic BC, 76% - recurrent BC; 77% received palbociclib, 21% ribociclib, 2% both drugs; 49% pts received CDK4/6i with fulvestrant and 51% with AI. CDK4/6i was used: 49% pts in 1L, 36% in 2L, 16% in 3L. Median DOR of CDK4/6i treatment was 9.07 months (range 2-38). 94% pts received anthracyclines and taxanes, eribulin was used in 2L in 60%, 30% in 3L, 8% in 4L, 2% in 5L. The most common sites of metastases (Mts) were bones (78%), liver (73%), lung (56%) and brain (8%); visceral Mts were seen in 90% pts. Median follow-up – 11,5 months (range 3-36). Results: Median cycles of eribulin therapy was 10,5 (range 1-44); objective response rate was seen in 24%, stabilization - 67%, progression - in 9%. Median PFS was 10.0 months, there were no significant differences in the different subgroups (visceral/no visceral; recurrent/de novo BC; age; CDK4/6i as 1L vs 2L, fulvestrant vs AI), p > 0,05. Median PFS was higher in pts with lung Mts vs non-lung (24 vs 9,1 months, p = 0.056). Most common AEs all grades were neutropenia (26%), anemia (9%), asthenia (9%), polyneuropathy (11.1%). AE did not affect the effectiveness of eribulin (p = 0.648). Dose reduction was in 19% pts and did not affect the effectiveness of eribulin (p = 0.612). At median follow-up of 11.5 months, 92.5% of patients still alive. Conclusions: As post-CDK4/6i therapy, eribulin in HR+HER2- MBC pts was effective and well tolerated, regardless of age, line of CDK4/6, CDK 4/6i combination partner. Patients with metastasis to the lung have better mPFS. Results in this real-world population of pts with HR+HER2- MBC were consistent with the EMPOWER study, and support administration of eribulin in 2-3 lines as an effective option for post-CD4/6i pts.

Background. Treatment results for the patients with stage II–III triple negative breast cancer (TN BC) have to be improved. Not only the new treatment regimens, but new predictive and prognostic factors should to be developed.Materials and methods. We included 98 patients with stage II–III TN BC in our study. We studied efficacy and safety of PlaTax regimen (cisplatin 75 mg / m2 day 1 + paclitaxel 80 mg / m2 days 1, 8, 15, course every 4 weeks) in this cohort of patients. We assessed pathologic response, survival and factors, which were relevant for predicting response and prognose survival.Results. PlaTax regimen is characterized by high efficacy and tolerable toxicity. Clinical efficacy was 85.8 %, pCR achievement was 60.5 %, tpCR achievement was 58.1 %. The regimen has low haematological toxicity (neutropenia III–IV grades – 4.1 %); the most frequent adverse events were polyneuropathy (18.5 %) and decreased renal function (24.5 %). 3-year progression-free survival was 68.4 %, most of the relapses (92 %) occurred during first 2 years. 3 year overall survival was 77.6 %. The most relevant predictive factor was level of Ki-67 ≥50 % (pCR 38.5 % vs. 68.7 %, p = 0.038). pCR achievement was the most important prognostic factor, resulting in improved 3-year progressionfree survival (44.3 % vs. 89.1 %, p 0.0001), and 3-year overall survival (61.5 % vs. 91.6 %, p = 0.001). Not only the residual disease, but also the size of residual tumor was important from prognostic point of view. Other important prognostic factors were size of the tumor, status of regional lymph nodes, grade. Delay in surgical treatment more than a month lead to decreased 3-year progression-free survival: 87.1 % vs. 62.5 % (p = 0.047).Conclusions. Our data suggest that studied regimen could be an option for patients with stage II–III TN BC. The assessment of the predictive and prognostic factors will help improve the treatment results for patients with stage II–III TN BC.