Peter Lin

Dr. Peter Lin

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

27Years (2000-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 December 2009 in Vascular
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PLPeter Lin
Peter Lin
SASuman Annambhotla
Suman Annambhotla
CBCarlos F. Bechara
Carlos F. Bechara
HAHusam Athamneh
Husam Athamneh
SWSarah M. Weakley
Sarah M. Weakley
PKPanagiotis Kougias
Panagiotis Kougias
Acute massive pulmonary embolism (PE) is a life-threatening condition that requires prompt and aggressive interventions, including anticoagulation, catheter-directed thrombolysis (CDT), mechanical thrombectomy, or surgical thromboembolectomy. The aim of this study was to evaluate the treatment outcome in patients with massive PE who were treated with either ultrasound-accelerated thrombolysis using the EkoSonic Endovascular System (EKOS) or CDT intervention. During a recent 10-year period, the clinical records of all patients with massive PE undergoing catheter-directed interventions were evaluated. Patients were divided into two treatment groups: EKOS versus CDT interventions. Comparisons were made with regard to the treatment outcome between the two groups. Twenty-five patients underwent 33 catheter-directed interventions for massive PE during the study period. Among them, EKOS or CDT was performed in 15 (45%) and 18 (55%) procedures, respectively. In the EKOS group, complete thrombus removal was achieved in 100% cases. In the CDT cohort, complete or partial thrombus removal was accomplished in 7 (50%) and 2 (14%) cases, respectively. Comparing treatment success based on thrombus removal, EKOS treatment resulted in an improved treatment outcome compared with the CDT group ( p ≤ .02). The mean time of thrombolysis in EKOS and CDT group was 17.4 ± 5.23 and 25.3 ± 7.35 hours, respectively ( p = .03). The mortality rate in the EKOS and CDT group was 9.1% and 14.2%, respectively (not significant). Treatment-related hemorrhagic complication rates in the EKOS and CDT group were 0% and 21.4%, respectively ( p = .02). A significant reduction in Miller scores was noted in both groups following catheter-based interventions. No significant difference in relative Miller score improvement was observed between groups. Ultrasound-accelerated thrombolysis using the EkoSonic system is an effective treatment modality in patients with acute massive PE. When compared with CDT, this treatment modality provides similar treatment efficacy with reduced thrombolytic infusion time and treatment-related complications.

1 September 2002 in Journal of Vascular Surgery
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PLPeter Lin
Peter Lin
RBRuth L. Bush
Ruth L. Bush
ECElliot L. Chaikof
Elliot L. Chaikof
CCChangyi Chen
Changyi Chen
BCBrian Conklin
Brian Conklin
ALAlan B. Lumsden
Alan B. Lumsden

1 December 2005 in The American Journal of Surgery
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PLPeter Lin
Peter Lin
RBRuth L. Bush
Ruth L. Bush
EPEric K. Peden
Eric K. Peden
WZWei Zhou
Wei Zhou
MGMarlon Guerrero
Marlon Guerrero
ALAlan B. Lumsden
Alan B. Lumsden

1 September 2009 in Seminars in Vascular Surgery
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PLPeter Lin
Peter Lin
ACAaron Y. Chen
Aaron Y. Chen
AVAlok Vij
Alok Vij

1 November 2007 in Journal of Vascular Surgery
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PLPeter Lin
Peter Lin
WZWei Zhou
Wei Zhou
PKPanagiotis Kougias
Panagiotis Kougias
HSHosam F. El Sayed
Hosam F. El Sayed
NBNeal R. Barshes
Neal R. Barshes
THTam T. Huynh
Tam T. Huynh

1 June 2003 in The American Journal of Surgery
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PLPeter Lin
Peter Lin
AKAlan J Koffron
Alan J Koffron
PGPaul J Guske
Paul J Guske
HLHenry J Lujan
Henry J Lujan
THTimothy J Heilizer
Timothy J Heilizer
CTConstantine J Tatooles
Constantine J Tatooles