Ken-Tye Yong

Prof. Ken-Tye Yong

Director, Centre for Bio Devices and Signal Analysis (VALENS), School of Electrical & Electronic Engineering, College of Engineering, Nanyang, Nanyang Technological University, 639798 Singapore

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

18Years (2009-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
18 February 2014 in Chemical Society Reviews
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Shuwen ZengShuwen Zeng
Shuwen Zeng
DBDominique Baillargeat
Dominique Baillargeat
HHHo-Pui Ho
Ho-Pui Ho
KYKen-Tye Yong
Ken-Tye Yong
The main challenge for all electrical, mechanical and optical sensors is to detect low molecular weight (less than 400 Da) chemical and biological analytes under extremely dilute conditions. Surface plasmon resonance sensors are the most commonly used optical sensors due to their unique ability for real-time monitoring the molecular binding events. However, their sensitivities are insufficient to detect trace amounts of small molecular weight molecules such as cancer biomarkers, hormones, antibiotics, insecticides, and explosive materials which are respectively important for early-stage disease diagnosis, food quality control, environmental monitoring, and homeland security protection. With the rapid development of nanotechnology in the past few years, nanomaterials-enhanced surface plasmon resonance sensors have been developed and used as effective tools to sense hard-to-detect molecules within the concentration range between pmol and amol. In this review article, we reviewed and discussed the latest trend and challenges in engineering and applications of nanomaterials-enhanced surface plasmon resonance sensors (e.g., metallic nanoparticles, magnetic nanoparticles, carbon-based nanomaterials, latex nanoparticles and liposome nanoparticles) for detecting “hard-to-identify” biological and chemical analytes. Such information will be viable in terms of providing a useful platform for designing future ultrasensitive plasmonic nanosensors.

15 April 2011 in Plasmonics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Shuwen ZengShuwen Zeng
Shuwen Zeng
KYKen-Tye Yong
Ken-Tye Yong
IRIndrajit Roy
Indrajit Roy
XDXuan-Quyen Dinh
Xuan-Quyen Dinh
XYXia Yu
Xia Yu
FLFeng Luan
Feng Luan

22 September 2016 in Chemical Reviews
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
GXGaixia Xu
Gaixia Xu
Shuwen ZengShuwen Zeng
Shuwen Zeng
BZButian Zhang
Butian Zhang
MSMak T Swihart
Mak T Swihart
KYKen-Tye Yong
Ken-Tye Yong
PPParas N. Prasad
Paras N. Prasad

9 July 2019 in Chemical Reviews
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
NPNishtha Panwar
Nishtha Panwar
ASAlana Mauluidy Soehartono
Alana Mauluidy Soehartono
KCKok Ken Chan
Kok Ken Chan
Shuwen ZengShuwen Zeng
Shuwen Zeng
GXGaixia Xu
Gaixia Xu
XCXiaoyuan Chen
Xiaoyuan Chen

22 November 2012 in Chemical Society Reviews
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
KYKen-Tye Yong
Ken-Tye Yong
Wing-Cheung LawWing-Cheung Law
Wing-Cheung Law
Rui HuRui Hu
Rui Hu
LYLing Ye
Ling Ye
LLLiwei Liu
Liwei Liu
PPParas N. Prasad
Paras N. Prasad
Tremendous research efforts have been devoted to fabricating high quality quantum dots (QDs) for applications in biology and medicine. Much of this research was pursued with an ultimate goal of using QDs in clinical applications. However, a great deal of concern has been voiced about the potential hazards of QDs due to their heavy-metal content. Many studies have demonstrated toxicity of various QDs in cell culture studies. However, in a smaller number of studies using small animal models (mice and rats), no abnormal behaviour or tissue damage was noticed over periods of months after the systemic administration of QDs. Nevertheless, the correlation of these results with the potential for negative effects of QD on humans remains unclear. Many urgent questions must be answered before the QDs community moves into the clinical research phase. This review provides an overview of the toxicity assessment of QDs, ranging from cell culture studies to animal models and discusses their findings. Guidelines for using various nonhuman primate models for QD toxicity studies are highlighted. This review article is intended to promote the awareness of current developments of QD applications in biology, the potential toxicity of QDs, and approaches to minimizing toxicity.

16 June 2016 in Scientific Reports
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
QOQingling Ouyang
Qingling Ouyang
Shuwen ZengShuwen Zeng
Shuwen Zeng
LJLi Jiang
Li Jiang
LHLiying Hong
Liying Hong
GXGaixia Xu
Gaixia Xu
KYKen-Tye Yong
Ken-Tye Yong
In this work, we designed a sensitivity-enhanced surface plasmon resonance biosensor structure based on silicon nanosheet and two-dimensional transition metal dichalcogenides. This configuration contains six components: SF10 triangular prism, gold thin film, silicon nanosheet, two-dimensional MoS2/MoSe2/WS2/WSe2 (defined as MX2) layers, biomolecular analyte layer and sensing medium. The minimum reflectivity, sensitivity as well as the Full Width at Half Maximum of SPR curve are systematically examined by using Fresnel equations and the transfer matrix method in the visible and near infrared wavelength range (600 nm to 1024 nm). The variation of the minimum reflectivity and the change in resonance angle as the function of the number of MX2 layers are presented respectively. The results show that silicon nanosheet and MX2 layers can be served as effective light absorption medium. Under resonance conditions, the electrons in these additional dielectric layers can be transferred to the surface of gold thin film. All silicon-MX2 enhanced sensing models show much better performance than that of the conventional sensing scheme where pure Au thin film is used, the highest sensitivity can be achieved by employing 600 nm excitation light wavelength with 35 nm gold thin film and 7 nm thickness silicon nanosheet coated with monolayer WS2.