Background: With this study, we investigate the short-term clinical outcomes of patients affected by diabetic macular edema (DME) after switching to intravitreal Faricimab (IVF) in a real-world setting. Methods: We conducted a retrospective chart review on all patients treated for DME with IVF who showed insufficient responses to prior anti-VEGF therapy. Data collected included baseline patient demographics, medical history, best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central retinal thickness (CRT) and central retinal volume (CRV). We analyzed functional and structural measures before and after IVF, compared baseline demographics and treatment factors between Faricimab-responders and reduced-responders and assessed influencing factors of the follow-up BCVA and CRT. Results: This study included 25 eyes from 16 patients. After switching to IVF, the mean BCVA showed no significant improvement, changing from 59.4 ± 13.4 Early Treatment of Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) letters at baseline to 61.4 ± 12.8 ETDRS letters at follow-up (p = 0.26). CRT significantly reduced from 414.4 ± 126.3 µm to 353.3 ± 131.1 µm (p < 0.011), and the 3 mm CRV significantly decreased from 2.8 ± 0.5 mm³ to 2.6 ± 0.6 mm³ (p < 0.012). Seven patients met the responder criteria, exhibiting an improvement of at least 5 ETDRS letters and a simultaneous CRT reduction of at least 30 µm. Further analysis showed that higher BCVA at baseline (p < 0.001) was associated with better BCVA following IVF, while higher baseline CRT (p < 0.003), a higher number of prior anti-VEGF agents (p < 0.034) and prior corticosteroid injections (p < 0.019) were associated with greater CRT at follow-up. Conclusions: Following the initial IVF injection series, we observed a clear improvement of anatomical measures. No functional improvement was observed, although visual acuity remained stable. Higher baseline BCVA was associated with better post-IVF BCVA, while higher baseline CRT, a greater number of prior anti-VEGF agents and prior corticosteroid injections were linked to higher CRT post-IVF.

Objectives: In this study, we evaluated clinical outcomes following a therapy switch to Faricimab, in a patient cohort affected by neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD), having received prior intravitreal anti-VEGF therapy. Methods: A retrospective investigation, including 28 eyes of 23 patients, treated for nAMD at the University Medical Center Mainz, Germany was performed. A switch in therapy to Faricimab was conducted, due to an inadequate response to the previous anti-VEGF treatment. Visual acuity (VA), central retinal thickness (CRT), and axial pigment epithelial detachment (PED) height were analyzed, following the first (FU 1) and second (FU 2) Faricimab injection series. Further, a subgroup analysis was conducted to compare Faricimab responders and diminished responders, as well as an exploratory data analyses to evaluate potential influencing factors on VA and CRT changes. Results: The mean age of patients was 82 years, with an average prior anti-VEGF treatment duration of 4.4 years and an average of 33 prior injections. Following Faricimab, at FU 1, significant reductions in CRT (from 335.8 µm to 260.0 µm, p < 0.01) and axial PED height (from 177 µm to 116 µm, p < 0.01) were observed. At FU 2, anatomical improvements were stable. No significant improvements in VA were observed, with LogMAR remaining stable at FU 1 and FU 2. In the subgroup comparison, eight eyes fulfilled the responder criteria, exhibiting morphological and functional improvements following intravitreal Faricimab. Further, a bigger baseline CRT correlated with a bigger post-treatment CRT and a longer prior treatment duration, and a worse baseline VA correlated with a worse post-Faricimab VA. No adverse events were noted following the switch to Faricimab. Conclusions: Following a switch to Faricimab, significant anatomical improvements were observed, while VA remained stable. Baseline CRT, prior treatment duration, and baseline LogMAR were associated with clinical outcomes post the switch to Faricimab. Further investigations into long-term outcomes are necessary to evaluate the sustained efficacy of Faricimab.

Purpose: Acute submacular hemorrhage (SMH) is a vision-threatening complication common in patients affected by age-related macular degeneration (AMD). This study evaluates safety, long-term clinical outcomes and associated treatment factors following intravitreal triple injection of recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (rtPA), SF₆ gas, and Bevacizumab due to acute SMH secondary to AMD. Methods: A retrospective analysis on patients who received treatment between January 2014 and December 2020 (n = 37) was conducted. Visual acuity (VA), central retinal thickness (CRT), central retinal volume (CRV), and axial pigment epithelial detachment height were analyzed at baseline (B), 4 weeks after triple injection (FU1), after the following anti-VEGF injection series (FU2), after 1 year (FU3), after 2 years (FU4), and at the final follow-up examination after 4.4 ± 1.6 years (FU5). Further, treatment courses and clinical outcomes were compared to a patient cohort treated for exudative AMD without prior SMH. Furthermore, an explorative data analysis on final VA was conducted, and adverse events following triple therapy were investigated. Results: Triple injection was performed on average 5.6 ± 5.7 days after onset of symptoms. Patients received 16 ± 3 additional intravitreal anti-VEGF injections due to persistent macular edema over the subsequent 2 years. Significant improvements were observed at FU1 in VA (p < 0.001), CRT (p = 0.005), and CRV (p = 0.007), as well as at FU2 in axial PED height (p < 0.001), with all improvements being stable until final follow-up examination. In the group comparison, patients with SMH demonstrated significantly worse functional and anatomical outcomes at 24 months except for the 24-month CRT, and patients on average received more intravitreal injections. Five of 37 patients (13.5%) experienced a retinal pigment epithelial tear following triple injection. Final VA correlated positively and significantly with FU1 VA, while no correlation was observed with baseline VA, the size or height of SMH, or the number of additional anti-VEGF injections. Conclusions: Triple injection constitutes a simple and effective therapy with long-term functional and anatomical improvements following treatment due to SMH, although patients have an increased risk for RPE tears. The 4-week postoperative VA following triple injection was predictive for long-term visual function.

Objectives: This study aims to analyze the association between systemic inflammation and clinical outcomes in patients with macular edema secondary to retinal vein occlusion (RVO). Methods: A retrospective analysis of 68 patients with acute RVO, in whom cardiovascular risk factors were assessed, was conducted. Laboratory determinations included levels of C-reactive protein (CRP) and homocysteine to explore the systemic inflammatory status. Optical coherence tomography (OCT) parameters and visual acuity (LogMAR) were collected at baseline. Follow-up visual acuity was determined after 12 months. The number of intravitreal anti-VEGF injections and the performed laser treatment were assessed after 12 and 24 months. Associations of inflammatory markers with clinical outcomes were analyzed by correlation analysis, and patients with or without evidence for inflammation were compared. Results: At baseline, the mean foveal retinal thickness (FRT) was 591 ± 277 µm, the mean average central retinal thickness (CRT) was 580 ± 227 µm, and the mean average central retinal volume (CRV) was 12 ± 3 mm³. The level of CRP at baseline was significantly associated with increased FRT, average CRT, and average CRV (p = 0.024; p = 0.027; p = 0.003). CRP levels were also associated with a lower BCVA at baseline and after 12 months (p = 0.018; p = 0.006). In patients with elevated homocysteine levels, a trend towards a higher number of required laser treatments was observed. No association between increased inflammatory parameters and the number of required intravitreal injections was detected. Conclusions: Systemic inflammation is associated with the severity of macular edema secondary to RVO. CRP concentrations could represent a prognostic marker for the course of the patient’s visual acuity.

Background: To assess short-term clinical outcomes in patients with retinal vein occlusion (RVO)-related macular edema switched to Faricimab after a suboptimal response to previous intravitreal therapy. Methods: In our retrospective single-center analysis, functional and anatomical changes of eyes affected by macular edema secondary to RVO were analyzed at baseline and four weeks after completing a three-injection Faricimab upload phase. Visual acuity (LogMAR) was analyzed as functional outcome measure, while central retinal thickness (CRT) and central retinal volume (CRV) were investigated as anatomical outcome measures. Further, a subgroup analysis compared treatment-related factors between patients exhibiting concurrent functional and anatomical improvements (full-responders) and those who did not (reduced-responders). Results: A total of 21 eyes from 20 patients were included. Mean visual acuity improved modestly from 0.50 ± 0.52 to 0.40 ± 0.31 LogMAR, without reaching statistical significance ( p = 0.257). Significant reductions in CRT (350.2 ± 124.5 to 302.6 ± 74.6 µm; p = 0.037) and CRV (2.53 ± 0.46 to 2.34 ± 0.29 mm ³ ; p = 0.011) were noted. A positive correlation between CRT reduction and VA improvement was observed (r = 0.499; p = 0.021). In comparison, full-responders exhibited a significantly worse baseline LogMAR ( p = 0.041) and CRT ( p = 0.026). Conclusion: In our study assessing the short-term effect of switching to intravitreal Faricimab, significant anatomical improvements were observed. Although no significant functional improvements were observed, likely reflecting a ceiling effect, visual acuity remained stable. Further studies are necessary to evaluate especially sustained functional outcomes under long-term Faricimab therapy.

Background/Objectives: To investigate the non-inferiority of preservative-free (PF) tafluprost eye drops (Taflotan sine^®) compared to latanoprost eye drops (Xalatan^®) in reducing mean 24 h intraocular pressure (IOP) on the second day of a diurnal IOP measurement. Methods: In this retrospective monocentric cohort study, patients suffering from primary open-angle glaucoma, ocular hypertension, normal tension glaucoma, pigment dispersion glaucoma, or pseudoexfoliation glaucoma who had undergone inpatient diurnal IOP measurement were included. Patients of cohort 1 used latanoprost eye drops as monotherapy; patients of cohort 2 used preservative-free tafluprost eye drops. Data from 7 January 2005 to 9 July 2019, inclusive, were analyzed. Results: Ninety-three eyes were included (n = 59 latanoprost group, n = 34 PF tafluprost group). Mean 24 h IOP on day 2 was 14.1 mmHg (SD 2.3) in the latanoprost group and 14.5 mmHg (SD 3.4) in the PF tafluprost group. The non-inferiority of PF tafluprost eye drops to latanoprost eye drops in efficacy on mean 24 h IOP could not be confirmed (95% CI −1.5, ∞, p = 0.235). The average difference in mean IOP at the individual measurement times between both cohorts was 0.24 mmHg (SD 0.17) on day 1 and 0.44 mmHg (SD 0.6) on day 2. The non-inferiority of PF tafluprost compared to latanoprost regarding fluctuation range could not be demonstrated for both days. Conclusions: The data suggests slight inferiority of PF tafluprost to latanoprost eye drops. There were similar mean 24 h IOP values in both cohorts. PF tafluprost eye drops remain a useful treatment option as long as the patient’s individual target pressure is achieved. Furthermore, according to the literature, it is also a treatment option for patients with symptoms of ocular surface disease and other side effects affecting the ocular surface while receiving preservative-containing topical therapy.