Periodontitis can disrupt oral and gut microbiota, leading to dysbiosis that affects overall systemic health. Besides the spread of periodontal pathogens by the hematogenous route, they can also be translocated into the gastrointestinal tract, possibly intervening in the neoplastic process in the gastrointestinal tract. This manuscript reviews the relationship between oral and gut microbiota due to periodontitis, discussing systemic health implications and potential links to gastrointestinal cancer. This article highlights the significance and effect of dysbiosis in the gut, emphasizing the importance of maintaining oral health to prevent systemic diseases. Lastly, it will go through therapeutic innovations such as probiotics and oral microbiota analysis tools for systemic disease detection. These findings will mark the integration of oral health management in clinical practice to lower systemic disease risk and improve overall patient outcomes. Aim of work: This manuscript aims to unravel the pathological interaction between oral and gut microbiota and their bidirectional effect on systemic diseases. Materials and methods: The review was performed using the MEDLINE and ScienceDirect databases. Reviewed articles were published in English between the year 2015 and 2024. The search used keywords such as (“oral microbiota” AND “periodontal disease”) OR (“oral microbiota” AND “gastrointestinal cancer”) OR (“Porphyromonas gingivalis” AND “periodontal disease”) OR (“Helicobacter pylori” AND “gastric cancer”) OR (“gut microbiome” AND “inflammatory bowel disease”) OR (“oral microbiome” AND “systemic diseases”). Conclusions: The dysbiotic change in the oral cavity due to periodontitis is linked directly and indirectly to systemic diseases such as IBS, neurodegenerative diseases, muscle joint diseases, respiratory infections, and gastrointestinal cancer; this underscores the importance of maintaining oral hygiene for prophylaxis of oral diseases and the prevention of systemic diseases. A better understanding of the interconnections between oral health and systemic diseases will integrate oral health management to offer new prevention, diagnostic, and treatment opportunities to improve overall patient outcomes.

Background and Objectives: This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the efficacy of xenogeneic collagen matrix (XCM) in combination with a coronally advanced flap (CAF) in the management of multiple gingival recessions and to compare its outcomes with those achieved using the conventional connective tissue graft (CTG) + CAF approach. Materials and Methods: After searching and reviewing the literature in the electronic databases PubMed/PMC, Google Scholar, ScienceDirect, Cochrane Library, and LILACS, 601 publications were found. The titles and abstracts of 543 publications were screened. After evaluating the full text of 290 publications, based on the inclusion criteria, four randomized controlled clinical trials were included in the systematic review and meta-analysis. In all the studies, the test group was treated with XCM + CAF, whereas in the control group, CTG + CAF was used. Results: Clinical attachment level (CAL), gingival recession depth (GR), keratinized tissue width (KTW), and complete root coverage (CRC) statistically significantly (p < 0.05) improved in both groups in all of the studies. Inter-group comparison showed better results in the control group in individual studies. All clinical trials reported a statistically significant (p < 0.05) decrease in surgery time and less postoperative pain in the test group. The meta-analysis of KTW (−0.438 [95% CI, −0.714 to −0.163], p < 0.002) and GR (0.35 [95% CI, 0.098 to 0.602], p < 0.001) showed a significant difference between the test and the control groups in all of the studies. CAL (0.78 [95% CI, −0.305 to 0.461], p > 0.05) showed no statistically significant difference between test and control groups. Conclusions: CTG + CAF remains the gold standard in root coverage procedures. However, XCM offers a less invasive alternative with improved patient comfort, less postoperative pain, shorter surgical time, and acceptable clinical outcomes.