Background: Over the last few decades, the efficacy of biological therapies for COPD has been evaluated by different randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Still, the evaluation of real-world data and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) have not been performed in this field before. In the current work, we present a systematic literature review of the real-world data and PROMs of biological treatments for COPD. Methods: Three large databases (MEDLINE/PubMed, Scopus, and ScienceDirect) were utilized for the systematic literature review. Clinical studies (RCT, cohorts, case series/reports) assessing patients with COPD treated by any biological therapy were included. Results: The review resulted in twelve eligible studies (nine randomized controlled trials and three “real-world” case series/reports). The evaluation of PROMs in the included studies was mainly limited to the severity and burden of respiratory symptoms. Most biological therapies were associated with improved PROMs compared to the baseline, although not for the placebo. Dupilumab was the only biologic therapy with proven efficacy in RCT for both objective and subjective measures. One prior study reported patients’ self-perceived drug effects, and none evaluated patients’ perceived disease status. Only 25 patients were assessed in a real-world setting for all biologic therapies combined. Real-world data were retrospective in the form of case reports or series. Conclusions: There are limited data on patients’ experience with biological therapies for COPD. While real-world data and PROMs are missing, biases such as a placebo effect must be considered, requiring their incorporation with objective outcomes from prospective controlled trials.

Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) is a major health concern with urgent unmet need for treatment options. There are three million new ARDS cases annually, and the disease’s mortality rate is high (35–46%). Cluster of differentiation 24 (CD24), a long-known protein with multifaceted functions, is a small, heavily glycosylated, membrane-anchored protein which functions as an immune checkpoint control. CD24 allows for immune discrimination between Damage-Associated Molecular Patterns and Pathogen-Associated Molecular Patterns derived from pathogens. Exosomes are intraluminal vesicles which play an important role in intercellular communication. Exosomes offer the advantage of targeted delivery, which improves safety and efficacy. The safety and efficacy of EXO-CD24 is promising, as was shown in >180 ARDS patients in phase 1b/2a, phase 2b, and compassionate use. CD24 binds Damage-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs) and inhibits the activation of the NF-ĸB pathway, a pivotal mediator of inflammatory responses. In contrast to anti-inflammatory therapies that are cytokine-specific or steroids that shut down the entire immune system, EXO-CD24 acts upstream, reverting the immune system back to normal activity. Herein, the safety and efficacy of mEXO-CD24 is shown in murine models of several pulmonary diseases (sepsis, allergic asthma, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease(COPD), fibrosis). EXO CD24 can suppress the hyperinflammatory response in the lungs in several pulmonary diseases with a significant unmet need for treatment options.

Hypersensitivity pneumonitis (HP) is a heterogeneous interstitial lung disease (ILD) that may be difficult to confidently diagnose. Recently, the 2020 ATS/JRS/ALAT HP diagnostic guidelines were published, yet data validating their performance in real-life settings are scarce. We aimed to assess the diagnostic performance of the HP guidelines compared to the gold-standard multidisciplinary discussion (MDD). For this purpose, we included consecutive ILD patients that underwent diagnostic bronchoscopy between 2017 and 2020 in three large medical centers. Four diagnostic factors (antigen exposure history, chest computed tomography pattern, bronchoalveolar lavage lymphocyte count, and histology results) were used to assign guidelines-based HP diagnostic confidence levels for each patient. A sensitivity analysis was performed, with MDD diagnosis as the reference standard. Overall, 213 ILD patients were included, 45 (21%) with an MDD diagnosis of HP. The guidelines’ moderate (≥70%) confidence threshold produced optimal performance with 73% sensitivity for HP, 89% specificity, and a J-index of 0.62. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) for a correct guidelines-based diagnosis was 0.86. The guidelines had better performance for non-fibrotic than fibrotic HP (AUC 0.92 vs. 0.82). All diagnostic factors, except bronchoalveolar lavage lymphocyte count, were independent predictors for MDD diagnosis of HP in a multivariate analysis. In conclusion, the HP guidelines exhibited a good diagnostic performance compared to MDD diagnosis in real-life setting.

Hospitalized patients with a high suspicion of pulmonary tuberculosis (HS-PTB) are isolated until a definite diagnosis can be determined. If doubt remains after negative sputum samples, bronchoscopy with bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) is often sought. Still, evidence of the added value of BAL in this patient population is scarce. To address this issue, we included consecutive HS-PTB patients with negative sputum samples who underwent BAL between 2017 and 2018. Chest X-rays (CXR) and CT scans were evaluated by a chest radiologist blind to the final diagnosis. Independent predictors for PTB were assessed by multivariate regression, using all positive PTB patients between 2017 and 2019 (by sputum or BAL) as a control group (n = 41). Overall, 42 HS-PTB patients were included (mean age 51 ± 9, 36% female). BAL was a viable diagnostic for PTB in three (7%) cases and for other clinically relevant pathogens in six (14%). Independent predictors for PTB were ≥2 sub-acute symptoms (adjusted OR 3.18, 95% CI 1.04–9.8), CXR upper-lobe consolidation (AOR 8.70, 95% CI 2.5–29), and centrilobular nodules in chest CT (AOR 3.96, 95% CI 1.20–13.0, p = 0.02). In conclusion, bronchoscopy with BAL in hospitalized patients with HS-PTB had a 7% added diagnostic value after negative sputum samples. Our findings highlight specific predictors for PTB diagnosis that could be used in future controlled studies to personalize the diagnostic evaluation.

Background: There have been no previous comprehensive reports on interstitial lung diseases (ILD) in Israeli population, that may have unique epidemiological features. We aimed to explore ILD in Israel, with an emphasis on disparities between different regions of the country. Methods: The study included consecutive patients with a multidisciplinary diagnosis of ILD, using data from registries of four tertiary medical centers (MC) located in Central and Northern Israel. Multivariate regression models were used to assess the region of residence (peripheral vs. central) as an independent predictor for ILD subtypes. Results: Included were 927 patients with ILD (mean age 67 ± 13, 40% females). Most patients (56–61%) reported working in at least one job that involved relevant inhalational exposures. Despite the geographic proximity of MCs (all within 100 km), significant variations in demographic and clinical characteristics were observed, including age, sex, exposures, and ILD diagnoses (p < 0.01). The most prevalent diagnoses were Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF, range 13–58%) and autoimmune-related ILD (11–30%). In peripheral areas, the diagnosis of IPF was more frequent (53% vs. 24%, p < 0.01), while exposure-related ILD (5% vs. 16%, p < 0.01) and autoimmune-related ILD (16% vs. 25%, p < 0.01) were more frequent in central Israel. In multivariate analysis, peripheral residence remained an independent predictor for IPF (AOR 2.95, 95% CI 2.1–4.1) and central residence for exposure-related ILD (AOR 0.46, 95% CI 0.33–0.63). Conclusions: Variations in ILD characteristics were observed between centers in close geographic proximity, highlighting disparities between peripheral and central Israel, and the need for personalized assessment based on local frequencies and exposures.