Chenghao Wang

Mr. Chenghao Wang

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

4Years (2023-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications

20 November 2024 in International Journal of Applied Linguistics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
BZBin Zou
Bin Zou
CWChenghao Wang
Chenghao Wang
YYYiwen Yan
Yiwen Yan
XDXiaoman Du
Xiaoman Du
YJYuan Ji
Yuan Ji


27 June 2025 in Learning and Motivation
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
BZBin Zou
Bin Zou
CWChenghao Wang
Chenghao Wang
HHHuimin He
Huimin He
CLCongxin Li
Congxin Li
EPErick Purwanto
Erick Purwanto
PWPing Wang
Ping Wang


5 December 2025 in Journal of Computer Assisted Learning
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
YDYiran Du
Yiran Du
MTMi Tang
Mi Tang
KJKunjie Jia
Kunjie Jia
CWChenghao Wang
Chenghao Wang
BZBin Zou
Bin Zou
Background: The integration of generative artificial intelligence (AI) into education has revolutionised teaching practices, offering educators advanced tools for lesson planning, content creation, personalised learning and administrative automation. While AI enhances efficiency and instructional effectiveness, concerns have emerged regarding teachers' potential overreliance on these technologies, leading to AI addiction. Objectives: This study applies the I‐PACE model (Interaction of Person‐Affect‐Cognition‐Execution) to explore the psychological and behavioural mechanisms underlying teachers' dependence on generative AI. Methods: Using survey data from 1750 teachers in Huanghua, China, the study examines factors such as self‐efficacy, need for cognition, mood regulation, positive affect, perceived usefulness and cognitive absorption in shaping AI addiction. Results: Findings indicate that cognitive absorption is the strongest predictor of AI dependence, while perceived usefulness, self‐efficacy and positive affect contribute indirectly through reinforcement mechanisms. Notably, mood regulation and need for cognition do not significantly influence AI addiction, suggesting that AI engagement in education is driven more by functional efficiency than emotional dependence. Conclusions: The results highlight the importance of fostering mindful AI integration in teaching to prevent habitual overreliance. This study provides theoretical contributions by extending the I‐PACE model to the context of AI addiction in education and offers practical insights for educators, institutions and policymakers in promoting responsible AI use while maintaining teachers' professional autonomy and cognitive engagement.