Manuel Cortiñas Sáenz

Dr. Manuel Cortiñas Sáenz


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

12Years (2015-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
18 September 2024 in Healthcare
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MSManuel Alejandro Sánchez-García
Manuel Alejandro Sánchez-García
BABernardino Alcazar
Bernardino Alcazar
MSManuel Cortiñas Sáenz
Manuel Cortiñas Sáenz
NTNicolás Cordero Tous
Nicolás Cordero Tous
RGRafael Galvez
Rafael Galvez
Background: Intrathecal drug delivery (IDD) is part of the fourth analgesic step. Evidence on the quality of life of patients with refractory chronic non-cancer pain (CNCP) using these devices and their long-term outcomes is scarce. This study aims to evaluate patients with IDD to assess their HRQoL. Additionally, the study seeks to understand the patients’ satisfaction with the treatment and changes in pain magnitude over time. Methods: Adult patients with CNCP and intrathecal drug delivery systems (IDDS) were included. The study population was divided into two groups: less than and more than 15 years of treatment. HRQoL was analyzed using validated questionnaires. Pain reduction was assessed using the visual analog scale (VAS), and treatment satisfaction was evaluated using the Patient Global Impression of Improvement scale. Results: The results indicate a poor HRQoL in IDD patients, with better scores in the group with ≥15 years of treatment. Pain reduction was similar in both groups, and patients reported a positive satisfaction level with the treatment. Conclusions: HRQoL in CNCP patients is severely affected. Long-term IDD patients have a similar or even better HRQoL in some respects compared to those with shorter follow-ups. IDD patients experienced pain reduction, with most feeling better or much better.

1 August 2018 in Revista da Associação Médica Brasileira
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JGJosé Luis Bonilla García
José Luis Bonilla García
MSManuel Cortiñas Sáenz
Manuel Cortiñas Sáenz
EGEsperanza del Pozo Gavilán
Esperanza del Pozo Gavilán
SUMMARY INTRODUCTION Healthcare associated infections (HAI) are the most frequent complication of hospitalized patients. The aim of this study was to describe the clinical and epidemiological characteristics of critically ill post-surgical patients with a diagnosis of healthcare associated infections, after a pattern of sedoanalgesia of at least 4 days. METHODS All patients over 18 years of age with a unit admission of more than 4 days were consecutively selected. The study population was the one affected by surgical pathology where sedation was based as analgesic the opioid remifentanil for at least 96 hours in continuous perfusion. Patients who died during admission to the unit and those with combined analgesia (peripheral or neuroaxial blocks) were excluded. Data analysis was performed using the statistical package Stata version 7.0. RESULTS The patients admitted to the Post-Surgical Critical Care Unit (PCU) during study were 1789 and the population eligible was comprised of 102 patients. 56.86% of patients suffered IACS. The most frequent IACS was pneumonia associated with mechanical ventilation (30.96 per 1000 days of mechanical ventilation), Pseudomonas aeruginosa being the most frequently isolated germ. The germs with the greatest involvement in multiple drug resistance (MDROs) were enterobacteria, mainly Klebsiella pneumoniae resistant to extended-spectrum beta-lactamases (ESBL). CONCLUSIONS Pneumonia associated with mechanical ventilation is the most prevalent HAI and Pseudomonas aeruginosa is the main etiological agent. The groups of antibiotics most frequently used were cephalosporin and aminoglycosides. It is necessary to implement the prevention strategies of the different HAI, since most of them are avoidable.

1 April 2015 in Revista de la Sociedad Española del Dolor
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MSManuel Cortiñas Sáenz
Manuel Cortiñas Sáenz
JBJ.L. Bonilla-García
J.L. Bonilla-García
CRC. Arnedo Ruiz
C. Arnedo Ruiz
AAA.I. Navajas Gómez de Aranda
A.I. Navajas Gómez de Aranda
MAM.B. Menoyo Alonso
M.B. Menoyo Alonso
FCF. Jerez Collado
F. Jerez Collado

Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
NTNicolás Cordero Tous
Nicolás Cordero Tous
MMMarcos Salmerón Martín
Marcos Salmerón Martín
BABernardino Alcazar
Bernardino Alcazar
MSManuel Cortiñas Sáenz
Manuel Cortiñas Sáenz
RGRafael Galvez
Rafael Galvez
MSManuel Alejandro Sánchez-García
Manuel Alejandro Sánchez-García
Background: Chronic pain is the leading cause of years lived with disability worldwide, with low back pain representing the most prevalent and disabling condition. Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) and intrathecal drug delivery (IDD) systems are established neuromodulation techniques for refractory chronic pain. However, a subset of patients experiences partial or declining benefit with either modality alone. In such cases, combined therapy may represent a rescue strategy. Methods: retrospective case series at a single center, including patients previously implanted with SCS who subsequently required IDD due to loss of efficacy or inadequate pain coverage. Pain intensity, opioid consumption, health-related quality of life, and patient satisfaction were assessed using validated instruments. Results: Twelve patients were included. Persistent low back pain with mixed nociceptive–neuropathic features was the most common indication. Combined therapy was observed in association with a mean reduction of 3.5 points on the Numeric Rating Scale, corresponding to an approximate 40% decrease in pain intensity. More than half of the patients discontinued systemic opioids. Complications occurred in seven patients (58.3%), mostly hardware-related and manageable with surgical revision; only one patient developed a device-related infection. Conclusions: In this case series, combined SCS and IDD therapy was observed in association with clinically meaningful pain reduction, decreased opioid use, and high patient-reported satisfaction. Although quality-of-life scores remained below population norms, patients consistently reported subjective improvement. Combined neuromodulation may represent a valid rescue option in selected patients with insufficient response to SCS alone.