WEi-Cheng Wu

Dr. WEi-Cheng Wu

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

13Years (2014-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 June 2020 in Renewable Energy
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
WWWEi-Cheng Wu
WEi-Cheng Wu
TWTaiping Wang
Taiping Wang
Zhaoqing YangZhaoqing Yang
Zhaoqing Yang
GMGabriel García Medina
Gabriel García Medina

1 June 2021 in Renewable Energy
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
GMGabriel García Medina
Gabriel García Medina
Zhaoqing YangZhaoqing Yang
Zhaoqing Yang
WWWEi-Cheng Wu
WEi-Cheng Wu
TWTaiping Wang
Taiping Wang

Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Taiping WangTaiping Wang
Taiping Wang
Zhaoqing YangZhaoqing Yang
Zhaoqing Yang
WWWEi-Cheng Wu
WEi-Cheng Wu
MGMolly Grear
Molly Grear
Deployment of wave energy converters (WECs) relies on consistent and accurate wave resource characterization, which is typically achieved through numerical modeling using deterministic wave models. The accurate predictions of large-wave events are critical to the success of wave resource characterization because of the risk on WEC installation, maintenance, and damage caused by extreme sea states. Because wind forcing is the primary driver of wave models, the quality of wind data plays an important role in the accuracy of wave predictions. This study evaluates the sensitivity of large-wave prediction to different wind-forcing products, and identifies a feasible approach to improve wave model results through improved wind forcing. Using a multi-level nested-grid modeling approach, we perform a series of sensitivity tests at four representative National Data Buoy Center buoy locations on the U.S. East and West Coasts. The selected wind-forcing products include the Climate Forecast System Reanalysis global wind product and North American Regional Reanalysis regional wind product as well as the observed wind at the buoys. Sensitivity test results indicate a consistent improvement in model predictions for the large-wave events (e.g., >90th percentile of significant wave height) at all buoys when observed-wind data were used to drive the wave model simulations.

9 March 2018 in Energies
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
WWWEi-Cheng Wu
WEi-Cheng Wu
Zhaoqing YangZhaoqing Yang
Zhaoqing Yang
Taiping WangTaiping Wang
Taiping Wang
This paper presents a modeling study conducted on the central Oregon coast for wave resource characterization, using the unstructured grid Simulating WAve Nearshore (SWAN) model coupled with a nested grid WAVEWATCH III® (WWIII) model. The flexibility of models with various spatial resolutions and the effects of open boundary conditions simulated by a nested grid WWIII model with different physics packages were evaluated. The model results demonstrate the advantage of the unstructured grid-modeling approach for flexible model resolution and good model skills in simulating the six wave resource parameters recommended by the International Electrotechnical Commission in comparison to the observed data in Year 2009 at National Data Buoy Center Buoy 46050. Notably, spectral analysis indicates that the ST4 physics package improves upon the ST2 physics package’s ability to predict wave power density for large waves, which is important for wave resource assessment, load calculation of devices, and risk management. In addition, bivariate distributions show that the simulated sea state of maximum occurrence with the ST4 physics package matched the observed data better than with the ST2 physics package. This study demonstrated that the unstructured grid wave modeling approach, driven by regional nested grid WWIII outputs along with the ST4 physics package, can efficiently provide accurate wave hindcasts to support wave resource characterization. Our study also suggests that wind effects need to be considered if the dimension of the model domain is greater than approximately 100 km, or O (102 km).

20 February 2014 in Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
CWChen-I Wang
Chen-I Wang
WWWEi-Cheng Wu
WEi-Cheng Wu
Arun Prakash PeriasamyArun Prakash Periasamy
Arun Prakash Periasamy
Huan-Tsung ChangHuan-Tsung Chang
Huan-Tsung Chang

1 September 2018
Verified
Report
Closed access
PDF file
ZYZhaoqing Yang
Zhaoqing Yang
WWWEi-Cheng Wu
WEi-Cheng Wu
TWTaiping Wang
Taiping Wang
LCLuca Castrucci
Luca Castrucci
The U.S. Department of Energy's Office of Scientific and Technical Information