The use of deep eutectic solvents (DESs) for the preparation of polymer membranes for environmental separation technologies is comprehensively reviewed. DESs have been divided into five categories based on the hydrogen bond donor (HBD) and acceptor (HBA) that are involved in the production of the DESs, and a wide range of DESs’ physicochemical characteristics, such as density, surface tension, viscosity, and melting temperature, are initially gathered. Furthermore, the most popular techniques for creating membranes have been demonstrated and discussed, with a focus on the non-solvent induced phase separation (NIPS) method. Additionally, a number of studies have been reported in which DESs were employed as pore formers, solvents, additives, or co-solvents, among other applications. The addition of DESs to the manufacturing process increased the presence of finger-like structures and macrovoids in the cross-section and, on numerous occasions, had a substantial impact on the overall porosity and pore size. Performance data were also gathered for membranes made for various separation technologies, such as ultrafiltration (UF) and nanofiltration (NF). Lastly, DESs provide various options for the functionalization of membranes, such as the creation of various liquid membrane types, with special focus on supported liquid membranes (SLMs) for decarbonization technologies, discussed in terms of permeability and selectivity of several gases, including CO₂, N₂, and CH₄.

This study explores the influence of various additives on the morphological, chemical, and thermal properties of poly(vinylidene fluoride) (PVDF) membranes prepared via the non-solvent induced phase separation (NIPS) technique. The use of a green solvent such as triethyl phosphate (TEP) was shown to be successful. A particular focus was dedicated to pore formers based on choline chloride–based deep eutectic solvents (DES) in combination with ethylene glycol and glycerol, i.e., ChCl/EG and ChCl/GLY, and its benchmark with traditional counterparts such as poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG) and glycerol (GLY). Comprehensive characterization was conducted using FESEM, FTIR, XRD, and DSC techniques to evaluate changes in membrane morphology, porosity, and crystallinity. PEG acted as a pore-forming agent, transitioning the internal structure from spherulitic to sponge-like with consistent pore sizes, while GLY produced a nodular morphology at higher concentrations due to increased dope solution viscosity. DES induced significant shifts in crystalline phase composition, decreasing α-phase fractions and promoting β-phase formation at higher concentrations. While the overall porosity remained unaffected by the addition of GLY or PEG, it was dependent on the DES concentration in the dope at lower values than those obtained by GLY and PEG. Membrane pore size with ChCl/GLY was lower than with ChCl/EG and GLY. All membranes showed performance at the hydrophobic regime. The findings demonstrate that ChCl/EG and ChCl/GLY can tailor the structural and thermal properties of TEP-driven PVDF membranes, providing a green and versatile approach to customize the membrane properties for specific applications.

Poly(ethylene terephthalate) (PET) waste accumulation poses significant environmental challenges due to its persistent nature and current management limitations. This study explores the effectiveness of imidazolium-based neoteric solvents [Emim][OAc] and [Bmim][OAc] as catalytic co-solvents in the glycolysis of PET with ethylene glycol (EG). Reaction thermal kinetics showed that both ionic liquids (ILs) significantly enhanced the depolymerization rate of PET compared to traditional methods. The use of [Emim][OAc] offered a lower activation energy of 88.69 kJ·mol⁻¹, thus making the process more energy-efficient. The contribution of key process parameters, including temperature (T), plastic-to-ionic liquid (P/IL) mass ratio, and plastic-to-solvent (P/S) mass ratio, were evaluated by means of a factorial analysis and optimized to achieve the maximum PET conversion for both neoteric solvents. The relevance sequence for both ionic liquids involved the linear factors T and P/S, followed by the interaction factors T×P/S and T×P/IL, with P/IL being the less significant parameter. The optimal conditions, with a predicted conversion of 100%, involved a temperature of 190 °C, with a P/IL of 1:1 and a P/S of 1:2.5, regardless of the IL used as the catalytic co-solvent.