Elisa Rachel Pisani Altafim

Dr. Elisa Rachel Pisani Altafim

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

14Years (2013-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 April 2016 in Psychosocial Intervention
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
EAElisa Rachel Pisani Altafim
Elisa Rachel Pisani Altafim
MLMaria Beatriz Martins Linhares
Maria Beatriz Martins Linhares
The present study aimed to review recent literature on universal violence and child maltreatment prevention programs for parents. The following databases were used: Web of Science, PsycINFO, PsycARTICLES, PubMed, LILACS, and SciELO. The keywords included the following: (Parenting Program or Parent Training or Parent Intervention) and (Maltreatment or Violence or Violence Prevention). For inclusion in this review, the programs had to be structured, working in groups of parents aiming to improve parenting practices. Twenty-three studies were included, and 16 different types of parenting programs were identified. Ninety-one percent of the studies were conducted in developed countries. All the programs focused on the prevention of violence and maltreatment by promoting positive parenting practices. Only seven studies were randomized controlled trials. All studies that evaluated parenting strategies (n=18), reported after the interventions. The programs also effectively improved child behavior in 90% of the studies that assessed this outcome. In conclusion, parenting educational programs appear to be an important strategy for the universal prevention of violence and maltreatment against children. Future studies should assess the applicability and effectiveness of parenting programs for the prevention of violence against children in developing countries. Further randomized control trials are also required

3 August 2021 in Trauma, Violence, & Abuse
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
CLCamila Regina Lotto
Camila Regina Lotto
EAElisa Rachel Pisani Altafim
Elisa Rachel Pisani Altafim
MLMaria Beatriz Martins Linhares
Maria Beatriz Martins Linhares
Adverse childhood experiences negatively impact future violence, victimization, perpetration, health, and lifelong development. The aim of the present study was to systematically review the scientific evidence of empirical studies on the association between maternal childhood adversity in a familial context, including maltreatment, household challenges, and later maternal negative parenting. A search was performed in the PubMed, PsycINFO, Web of Science, SciELO, and LILACS databases, using the combination of the following keywords: (neglect OR abuse OR maltreatment OR harsh parenting OR punishment OR discipline OR negative parenting practices) AND (adverse childhood experiences OR early adversity OR cycle of violence OR cycle of maltreatment OR history of maltreatment) AND (mother OR maternal). The results of 29 studies showed predominantly significant direct associations between maternal childhood adversities and negative parenting with their children (83%). Parental stress was also significantly associated with a maternal history of childhood adversities. Focusing on the type of maltreatment practices, there were similar intergenerational transmission types: homotypic and heterotypic. Few studies have examined the protective factors that could buffer the negative impact of a maternal childhood history of adversities on later negative parenting.

1 June 2018 in Children and Youth Services Review
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
EAElisa Rachel Pisani Altafim
Elisa Rachel Pisani Altafim
DMDana Charles McCoy
Dana Charles McCoy
MLMaria Beatriz Martins Linhares
Maria Beatriz Martins Linhares

3 July 2022 in Parenting
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
JLJennifer E. Lansford
Jennifer E. Lansford
TBTheresa S. Betancourt
Theresa S. Betancourt
KBKimberly Boller
Kimberly Boller
JPJill Popp
Jill Popp
EAElisa Rachel Pisani Altafim
Elisa Rachel Pisani Altafim
CRChemba Raghavan
Chemba Raghavan
SYNOPSIS This article examines the role that implementation science can play in evidence-based parenting programs. Although parenting programs can support parents in their caregiving roles, adapting and taking an evidence-based approach from one place to another without attending to implementation factors may contribute to poor impact in a new setting. Implementation science enables researchers to move beyond monitoring and evaluation of outcomes of a parenting program to understanding the process of putting the program into practice. Factors such as whether the program meets the needs of families and communities, how to secure buy-in from key stakeholders, what training and supervision are needed for the workforce, and ways that parenting programs can be integrated in existing infrastructure are all critical to successful implementation. Quality improvement can be built into the implementation process through feedback loops that inform rapid changes and testing cycles over time as a program is implemented. If researchers lead initial implementation of parenting programs, they must determine how the program can continue to work when using community workers and local systems rather than researchers. Open access components are especially important for the implementation of parenting programs in low- and middle-income countries to avoid prohibitive costs of proprietary programs and to benefit from flexibility in adapting components to meet the needs of particular local populations. Parenting programs benefit when policy makers, program leaders, and researchers attend not only to the what but also to the how of implementation.Objective. Design. Results. Conclusions.

30 September 2022 in Trauma, Violence, & Abuse
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MAMarina Dias Macedo de Melo Avezum
Marina Dias Macedo de Melo Avezum
EAElisa Rachel Pisani Altafim
Elisa Rachel Pisani Altafim
MLMaria Beatriz Martins Linhares
Maria Beatriz Martins Linhares
Violence against children is a significant problem, particularly during early childhood development. Spanking and other forms of corporal punishment in child-rearing have been used by families worldwide to correct children’s unwanted behaviors. Despite previous studies focusing on the negative consequences of these parental practices, open questions remain. The present study aimed to systematically review the empirical studies published in scientific literature that examined the associations between parenting practices of spanking and corporal punishment of mothers and their children’s behaviors and development in early childhood. Search was performed in PubMed, APA PsycNet, Web of Science, SciELO, and LILACS databases using the combination of the following keywords: ((spank OR physical punishment OR physical abuse OR physical maltreatment OR corporal punishment) AND (parenting)) AND (child* development OR child* behavior). The inclusion and exclusion criteria were applied and 34 articles were selected for review. The inclusion criteria were the following: studies that evaluated associations between maternal spanking or corporal punishment practices and behaviors or development of 0-to-6-year-old children; quantitative studies; studies published in English, Spanish, or Portuguese language. The results showed that in 94% of the studies, there were significant associations between maternal spanking and corporal punishment with deteriorated child behavior and development, concurrently or later. In addition, maternal physical practices also acted as mediators or moderator variables in models that explained behavioral and developmental problems in early childhood.

1 May 2019 in Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
EAElisa Rachel Pisani Altafim
Elisa Rachel Pisani Altafim
MLMaria Beatriz Martins Linhares
Maria Beatriz Martins Linhares