The acceleration of urbanization intensifies the urban heat island, outdoor activities (especially the road travel) are seriously affected by the overheating environment, and the comfort and safety of the bus shelter as an accessory facility of road travel are crucial to the passenger’s experience. This study investigated the basic information (e.g., distribution, orientation) of 373 bus shelters in Guangzhou and extracted the typical style by classifying the characteristics of these bus shelters. Additionally, we also measured the thermal environment of some bus shelters in summer and investigated the cooling behavior of passengers in such an environment. The results show that the typical style of bus shelters in the core area of Guangzhou is north–south orientation, with only one station board at the end of the bus, two backboards, two roofs (opaque green), and the underlying surface is made of red permeable brick. The air temperature and relative humidity under different bus shelters, tree shading areas, and open space in summer are 34–37 °C and 49–56%, respectively. For the bus shelters with heavy traffic loads, the air temperature is basically above 35.5 °C, and the thermal environment is not comfortable. During the hot summer, when there is no bus shelter or trees to shade the sun, the waiting people adjust their position with the sun’s height, azimuth angles, and direct solar radiation intensity to reduce the received radiation as much as possible, which brings great inconvenience to them. When only bus shelters provide shade, people tend to gather in the shaded space, and cooling measures such as umbrellas, hats, and small fans are still needed to alleviate thermal discomfort. However, the aforementioned various spontaneous cooling behaviors still cannot effectively alleviate overheating, and it is very important to increase auxiliary cooling facilities in bus shelters.

Building drainage systems are essential for protecting occupant health and indoor air quality. While recent studies have focused on high-rise drainage dynamics and riser offset mitigation, ventilation components—particularly appliance vent pipes—remain underexplored. This study employed a full-scale proportional drainage experimental tower to assess appliance vent pipes on horizontal branches as a strategy for water seal protection in dual-riser systems. Maximum drainage capacities were quantified under varying pipe positions and diameters (DN50, DN75, DN100), alongside analyses of pressure transients and water seal losses. Results indicate that appliance vent pipes increase maximum drainage capacity from 6.5 L/s (baseline cast iron dual-riser) to 7.5 L/s, a 1.0 L/s gain, though improvements are modest. Position does not affect capacity (uniformly 7.5 L/s across configurations) but profoundly influences water seal losses: P-type trap placement yields the lowest losses on most floors, combined P-type trap/floor drain placement achieves intermediate values, and floor drain placement the highest. Thus, the P-type trap is optimal. Diameter similarly has no impact on capacity but shows nuanced effects on seals; DN75 minimizes losses on most floors, outperforming DN50 and DN100, indicating that appliance vent pipe design should adopt a height-zoned approach tailored to anticipated drainage loads and pressure characteristics. Appliance vent pipes effectively dampen positive/negative pressure fluctuations, reducing seal depletion and sewer gas risks. These findings guide engineering designs for healthier indoor environments in high-rise buildings.