Mi Kyoung Kim

Prof. Dr. Mi Kyoung Kim

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

10Years (2017-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 January 2019 in Journal of Gynecologic Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
MKMi Kyoung Kim
Mi Kyoung Kim
SSSeok Ju Seong
Seok Ju Seong
SKSoon-Beom Kang
Soon-Beom Kang
DBDuk-Soo Bae
Duk-Soo Bae
HKHak Jae Kim
Hak Jae Kim
JPJIHEUM PAEK
JIHEUM PAEK
Kim MK, et al. J Gynecol Oncol. 2018 Aug;30:e47. https://doi.org/10.3802/jgo.2019.30.e47

1 December 2020 in Clinical and Experimental Reproductive Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SWSeyeon Won
Seyeon Won
MKMi Kyoung Kim
Mi Kyoung Kim
SSSeok Ju Seong
Seok Ju Seong
Endometrial cancer (EC) in young women tends to be early-stage and low-grade; therefore, such cases have good prognoses. Fertility-sparing treatment with progestin is a potential alternative to definitive treatment (i.e., total hysterectomy, bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, pelvic washing, and/or lymphadenectomy) for selected patients. However, no evidence-based consensus or guidelines yet exist, and this topic is subject to much debate. Generally, the ideal candidates for fertility-sparing treatment have been suggested to be young women with grade 1 endometrioid adenocarcinoma confined to the endometrium. Magnetic resonance imaging should be performed to rule out myometrial invasion and extrauterine disease before initiating fertility-sparing treatment. Although various fertility-sparing treatment methods exist, including the levonorgestrel-intrauterine system, metformin, gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists, photodynamic therapy, and hysteroscopic resection, the most common method is high-dose oral progestin (medroxyprogesterone acetate at 500–600 mg daily or megestrol acetate at 160 mg daily). During treatment, re-evaluation of the endometrium with dilation and curettage at 3 months is recommended. Although no consensus exists regarding the ideal duration of maintenance treatment after achieving regression, it is reasonable to consider maintaining the progestin therapy until pregnancy with individualization. According to the literature, the ovarian stimulation drugs used for fertility treatments appear safe. Hysterectomy should be performed after childbearing, and hysterectomy without oophorectomy can also be considered for young women. The available evidence suggests that fertility-sparing treatment is effective and does not appear to worsen the prognosis. If an eligible patient strongly desires fertility despite the risk of recurrence, the clinician should consider fertility-sparing treatment with close follow-up.

1 January 2023 in Yonsei Medical Journal
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SCSu Hyeon Choi
Su Hyeon Choi
SKSujin Kim
Sujin Kim
SLSiwon Lee
Siwon Lee
SWSeyeon Won
Seyeon Won
SSSo Hyun Shim
So Hyun Shim
MKMi-La Kim
Mi-La Kim
Choi SH, et al. Yonsei Med J. 2023 Mar;64(3):204-212. https://doi.org/10.3349/ymj.2022.0278

1 January 2022 in Yonsei Medical Journal
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SKSu Jin Kim
Su Jin Kim
SCSu Hyeon Choi
Su Hyeon Choi
SWSeyeon Won
Seyeon Won
SSSohyun Shim
Sohyun Shim
NLNara Lee
Nara Lee
MKMi-La Kim
Mi-La Kim
Kim SJ, et al. Yonsei Med J. 2022 May;63(5):446-451. https://doi.org/10.3349/ymj.2022.63.5.446

1 January 2020 in Journal of Gynecologic Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MKMi Kyoung Kim
Mi Kyoung Kim
SSSeok Ju Seong
Seok Ju Seong
PCPark Dong Choon
Park Dong Choon
JHJin Hwa Hong
Jin Hwa Hong
JRJu-Won Roh
Ju-Won Roh
SKSoon-Beom Kang
Soon-Beom Kang
Kim MK, et al. J Gynecol Oncol. 2019 Jun;31:e51. https://doi.org/10.3802/jgo.2020.31.e51

1 January 2017 in Journal of Gynecologic Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
DKDa Hee Kim
Da Hee Kim
SSSeok Ju Seong
Seok Ju Seong
MKMi Kyoung Kim
Mi Kyoung Kim
HBHyo Sook Bae
Hyo Sook Bae
MKMi-La Kim
Mi-La Kim
JSJeong Yun Shim
Jeong Yun Shim
Kim DH, et al. J Gynecol Oncol. 2016 Aug;28:e1. http://dx.doi.org/10.3802/jgo.2017.28.e1