Sergey Golubev

Dr. Sergey Golubev

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

19Years (2008-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications

7 June 2023 in Microorganisms
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
AMAnna Yu. Muratova
Anna Yu. Muratova
SGSergey Golubev
Sergey Golubev
VRValeria Romanova
Valeria Romanova
ИСИрина Сунгурцева
Ирина Сунгурцева
ANAsil Nurzhanova
Asil Nurzhanova
Microbial-assisted phytoremediation is considered a more effective approach to soil rehabilitation than the sole use of plants. Mycolicibacterium sp. Pb113 and Chitinophaga sp. Zn19, heavy-metal-resistant PGPR strains originally isolated from the rhizosphere of Miscanthus × giganteus, were used as inoculants of the host plant grown in control and zinc-contaminated (1650 mg/kg) soil in a 4-month pot experiment. The diversity and taxonomic structure of the rhizosphere microbiomes, assessed with metagenomic analysis of rhizosphere samples for the 16S rRNA gene, were studied. Principal coordinate analysis showed differences in the formation of the microbiomes, which was affected by zinc rather than by the inoculants. Bacterial taxa affected by zinc and the inoculants, and the taxa potentially involved in the promotion of plant growth as well as in assisted phytoremediation, were identified. Both inoculants promoted miscanthus growth, but only Chitinophaga sp. Zn19 contributed to significant Zn accumulation in the aboveground part of the plant. In this study, the positive effect of miscanthus inoculation with Mycolicibacterium spp. and Chitinophaga spp. was demonstrated for the first time. On the basis of our data, the bacterial strains studied may be recommended to improve the efficiency of M. × giganteus phytoremediation of zinc-contaminated soil.

21 August 2008 in Water, Air, & Soil Pollution
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
SGSergey Golubev
Sergey Golubev
ASAndrei V. Schelud’ko
Andrei V. Schelud’ko
AMAnna Yu. Muratova
Anna Yu. Muratova
OMOleg E. Makarov
Oleg E. Makarov
OTOlga V. Turkovskaya
Olga V. Turkovskaya

1 December 2021 in Microbiological Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SGSergey Golubev
Sergey Golubev
AMAnna Yu. Muratova
Anna Yu. Muratova
LPLeonid V. Panchenko
Leonid V. Panchenko
SSSergey Yu. Shchyogolev
Sergey Yu. Shchyogolev
OTOlga V. Turkovskaya
Olga V. Turkovskaya

7 January 2023 in Life
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
LPLeonid Panchenko
Leonid Panchenko
AMAnna Yu. Muratova
Anna Yu. Muratova
EDEkaterina Dubrovskaya
Ekaterina Dubrovskaya
SGSergey Golubev
Sergey Golubev
OTOlga Turkovskaya
Olga Turkovskaya
Natural and technical phytoremediation approaches were compared for their efficacy in decontaminating oil-polluted soil. We examined 20 oil-contaminated sites of 800 to 12,000 m2 each, with different contamination types (fresh or aged) and levels (4.2–27.4 g/kg). The study was conducted on a field scale in the industrial and adjacent areas of a petroleum refinery. Technical remediation with alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.), ryegrass (Lolium perenne L.), nitrogen fertilizer, and soil agrotechnical treatment was used to clean up 10 sites contaminated by oil hydrocarbons (average concentration, 13.7 g/kg). In technical phytoremediation, the per-year decontamination of soil was as high as 72–90%, whereas in natural phytoremediation (natural attenuation with native vegetation) at 10 other oil-contaminated sites, per-year decontamination was as high as that only after 5 years. Rhizodegradation is supposed as the principal mechanisms of both phytoremediation approaches.

1 June 2011 in Plant Physiology and Biochemistry
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SGSergey Golubev
Sergey Golubev
AMAnna Yu. Muratova
Anna Yu. Muratova
LWLutz Wittenmayer
Lutz Wittenmayer
ABAnastasia D. Bondarenkova
Anastasia D. Bondarenkova
FHFrank Hirche
Frank Hirche
OTOlga V. Turkovskaya
Olga V. Turkovskaya