Adipose tissue micrografts (ATM) and dermis micrografts (DMG) have emerged as promising autologous therapies in regenerative wound care, leveraging mechanically disaggregated cell–matrix constructs to modulate the wound microenvironment and promote tissue repair. This scoping review systematically analyzed clinical studies investigating ATMs and DMGs in acute and chronic wounds. Eight studies, comprising randomized controlled trials, observational studies, and case series, were identified, involving diverse wound types such as burns, ulcers, surgical dehiscence, and posttraumatic defects. All interventions utilized mechanical disaggregation (Rigenera^® system) to produce micrografts, which were applied via perilesional injection, scaffold-assisted delivery, or topical administration. Outcomes consistently demonstrated accelerated re-epithelialization, enhanced angiogenesis, improved scar remodeling, and low complication rates. In select studies, micrografts were combined with platelet-rich fibrin or stromal vascular fraction, suggesting potential synergistic effects. While one randomized trial showed superior healing outcomes with DMGs over collagen scaffolds, others yielded mixed results, likely reflecting heterogeneity in methodology and outcome measures. Overall, the available clinical evidence supports the safety, feasibility, and biological activity of micrograft-based therapies. However, larger, standardized, and mechanistically driven studies are required to validate their efficacy and define optimal protocols across wound etiologies.

Background and Objectives: Vascular access in cancer patients with limited mobility remains a persistent clinical challenge, although both devices and insertion methods have improved considerably. We present our clinical experience with at-home PICC placement, supported by real-world data from routine practice, in oncology patients unable to attend hospital care, exploring its feasibility, safety, and practical applicability. Materials and Methods: All PICC insertions were performed at patients’ bedside by a trained surgeon using sterile technique. A single- or double-lumen PICC catheter was inserted under ultrasound guidance, magnetic tracking, and intracavitary ECG confirmation to secure optimal venous entry and accurate tip positioning. Results: A total of 28 PICC lines were successfully inserted in 26 oncologic patients. Two patients required catheter re-insertion, one following accidental removal and one due to infection. In 26 of 28 cases (92.9%), insertions were completed on the first attempt, while two cases required a second attempt. Insertion in the Green Zone per the ZIM classification was achieved in 26 of 28 cases (92.9%), and only two required insertions in the Yellow Zone. The basilic vein was chosen in 75% of patients. A total of 23 single-lumen and five double-lumen catheters were inserted. In terms of complications, four cases of systemic infection occurred more than 15 days after insertion and were not considered insertion-related; two patients developed localized edema requiring anticoagulation, and four catheter occlusions were managed conservatively. Conclusions: At-home PICC placement appears to be a feasible and clinically applicable approach when performed by qualified and credentialed professionals. These observations, derived from real-world clinical experience, suggest a potential role for this model in selected patient populations. Using proper sterile technique and real-time tip confirmation tools, this intervention may contribute to improved continuity of care and reduced hospital visits in selected patients. These observations suggest a potential role for expanding outpatient vascular access programs in selected patient populations.